 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
The highcoin (HIGHT) crypto community has over 7,000 investors. That means something. A special perspective. Join. https://discord.gg/Pmh9YrВ криптосообществе HighCoin (HIGHT) более 7000 инвесторов. Это многое значит. Особенная перспектива. Присоединяйтесь. https://discord.gg/Pmh9Yr |
|
|
|
Correct me if I am wrong, but what the early investors are doing it called "being angry" for getting something other than what they agreed upon when initially buying into the coin. At the point of sale for the early investor, none of us was warned about getting our shares dilutted to basically nothing.
I'm an early investor of another coin, and when they did their swap, it was 1 for 1. So now you have a TON of early investors who called the share dilustion "BS". It is what it is, and with 100% accuracy, the PAC DEV team lost all of the early investor base which is substantially larger than the new investor base at the time of writing. The early investors will NOT buy into this coin again (Fool me once, your fault, fool me twice, MY FAULT because I new better). Go ahead and tell us that early investors should "get over it", "stop being a baby", "grow up", and "move on with your life." The funny and interesting thing is, those comments were echoed or used when promoting your coin, but Oh baby, you love to use it now.
I'd like to see your numbers. You claim we lost "all" early investors. Provide some proof to that. A fud attack from a handful of our total investors, plus bots, does not represent the entirety of the early investors. Early investors would be defined as people who bought in back in the early days of the coin. So you bought in back in 2014/2015...correct? If so, you bought when Bill Corless and his team owned and ran the coin. Of course you didn't hear about the redemption, as it wasn't part of his plans. He then abandoned Paccoin, and it just sat on the market, unattended, and with the same broken faulty code. When the new team took over the coin in late 2017, it was decided to undergo a transformation. The old code was badly written, broken, theoretically infinite supply which would have never allowed Paccoin to grow into any real value, and caused a lot of headaches for staking rewards. Thus a new coin was created. Once the decision was made, and the code being written, it was announced that the old Paccoin would undergo a Redemption to the new coin at 1000:1, with the new coin being released at x1000 of the then current price of Paccoin. The name, logo, and cost of the Masternodes were all community chosen. So if you were an early investor, you would have known all about these things, right? We have explained multiple times why people such as yourself didn't understand the sudden change in value of your investment, due to the BTC decimal place limitations. Even with warnings across multiple social media platforms, not everyone was reached. We put it out there that people need to get off of Cryptopia, and to do your research on prices vs different pairings, before purchasing. We are sympathetic to those who were caught completely off guard, but there was no scam. If we were a scam, we would have sold all the old Paccoin as investors sent them in. Considering they are still sitting in the redemption wallets and Paccoin is delisted, that means we are the worst scammers ever. If we were a scam, we would have left. We are still here. If we were a scam, we wouldn't be continuing to develop the coin, projects, release new wallets, be a presenter at a Cryptocurrency expo in London, and we certainly wouldn't be pushing out a fix to stop the ProHash issue from making the price of the coin go down. I hope this helps clear things up for you. Many have lost their money, but the Developers Did well! They do what they promise. PAC will be higher, than bought. Patience! Brad end Drew-Respect! |
|
|
|
|
HTMLCOIN Aside panic. We intend to comply with all future rules and regulations on cryptography and securities. In fact, we view the Fund as a software company. We create and mainaint software that is used to launch decentralized blockchain and all its functions. The Fund does not sell anything and has no relation to the activities of the Treasury.
As I said, the base does not depend on prices on the exchanges, but to create great software to encourage OD implementation of decentralized blockchain technology. Our approach is more than a coin platform as long as we are not looking for projects to land in our circuit, the start marker to generate business for themselves..... what we do using the value transfer (bitcoin) blockchain opportunity to drive a very wide (horizontal) adoption in both commercial and private use. This is what the program is about POMA.
To the extent that, as we grow the base implementation of a simple-to-use technology with a desktop computer and soon to arrive mobile wallets, we have a community of users who can start using the blockchain for other things. These things will use DAP, smart contracts, and other technologies to provide a richer and more damaging (vertical) solutions.
Why we adhere to this approach ?
Speed, pace and relevance. What we observed is a lot of great platforms that grow, which are then placed projects, which, it seems, must have its own user base. Projects don't seem to relate to users of the block chain...... what we are confused. The blockchain is not like the cloud computing platform is a community that decided to use a decentralized platform transmission cost, which can supply decentralized applications (relevant to their worlds)
What's holding us back ?
This is a personal opinion and not the official line. At the moment we have to regroup and focus on the features and growth. We (the core team) must consider the broader picture with a complete economic model of growth and acceptance, and to construction. We have full time developers on the team, and POMA has been in development for a long time, so the challenge for us is appropriate and establshing campaigns.
Are there any blockers. Now I don't think so. Let's see how far we've come since we started in September. I think the biggest problem Zingel is an industry, and his arrival likely regulation. We take very seriously the recent decisions of the SEC, as well as treasuries, which are an important part of the ECO-system. This means that the community must behave in an exception for us to get on the list. In exchnages we turned to look, and carrying them for business solutions based on our innovation projects, our likely growth, the health of our coins (stable and non-pumped) and the quality/participation in achieving our intended goal of mass implementation of the blockchain.
What are the key risks ? personally:
1. We support good regulation, but not regulation that hinders decentralized blockchain.
2. The dominance of bitcoin and its politk. For me, it casts a shadow across our inidustry. Bitcoin has no roadmap, strategy and architectural consensus. I mean, they still haven't launched the original white paper of Satoshi. The constant struggle and technical policy destroy value, destroy the environment and make us fools. As an Alt-coin, the influence of bitcoin is that it destabilizie the adoption of alternative and better technologies, while people looking for free money and move in/out of it.
3. Time and workload.
You will see a lot from this team, more than is warranted by its size. We have and use an extensive network of friends and developers teams, but no matter what we do, you guys want him last week, and if we could slip out for a few days, we know that you'll be frustrated. But, this software development, and we are the team with the delivery of the software. It is what it is and it takes as much time as you need. Quality is everything ! Don't panic! be calm! ...Your Russian support team.
|
|
|
|
|
#BreakingNews #htmlcoin #NewExchanges New & important #Blockchain partnership #html Blockchain rebranding Exciting Updates coming in the next 48...
Админы подали петицию #HTMLCOIN на новую биржу #UpCoin_Exchange НА этой БИРЖЕ ЗА РЕГИСТРАЦИЮ 500 БАЧЕЙ НА СЧЕТ МГНОВЕННО. upcoin.com/?ID=996afa74
|
|
|
|
|
