Bitcoin Forum
May 31, 2024, 02:20:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: GTX 1060 discussion thread on: March 10, 2018, 12:56:52 AM
Hi, I have two Founder Edition 1060 6gb cards with Samsung memory. Following some other guides I have seen I have mine set in Afterburner as:
Power limit - 65
Temp limit - 87
Core Clock - -150
Memory Clock - +700
Fan - 65

If I increase the memory clock Claymore is showing GPU errors and today I am finding what I thought were these stable settings are causing one of the GPU's to throttle. My electricity cost of $0.18 so I have to be a bit careful. Has anyone got any ideas how I can get more out of these as the general consensus seems to be that with Samsung ram the memory clock should be able to go much higher.
Thank you

All my samsung memory cards go to +900 and I run them at +850 on 62-64% power. Try it with the core clock at 0. I never adjust my core clock despite what others say because I find there is no gain by doing so. I also don't set the fan at 65 as I prefer the AfterBurner curve but that shouldn't affect anything.

There is a chance your specific card may require more power. As a general rule I keep my power at 75 when testing to make sure it can handle +850. When I know there are no errors, I slowly decrease the power until I find the error point and then run it at 1 or 2 points higher than the minimum. My Founders edition run at 64% and my Zotacs can handle 62%.

afaik power limit in Nvidia cards only refers to how much voltage is given to the core, not the ram. In fact, when you increase that power limit, the core clock goes up aswell. If that was the case that more power limit gives more ram "room" to hit higher frecuencies, ram speed would also run faster as you move the slider, but that does not occur. Moreover, i can garantee that even increasing to 116% the power limiit, will make no difference in how much can i push the ram.



Thanks for this. You were right when I reduced the core to 0 and increased the memory clock the hash rate increased. Interestingly though one card will take +850 and the other +700 at most. This seems odd.
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: GTX 1060 discussion thread on: March 09, 2018, 06:32:07 PM
Hi, I have two Founder Edition 1060 6gb cards with Samsung memory. Following some other guides I have seen I have mine set in Afterburner as:
Power limit - 65
Temp limit - 87
Core Clock - -150
Memory Clock - +700
Fan - 65

If I increase the memory clock Claymore is showing GPU errors and today I am finding what I thought were these stable settings are causing one of the GPU's to throttle. My electricity cost of $0.18 so I have to be a bit careful. Has anyone got any ideas how I can get more out of these as the general consensus seems to be that with Samsung ram the memory clock should be able to go much higher.
Thank you
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: New Rig - fluctuating hash rates is this normal please on: March 05, 2018, 08:48:56 PM
Thanks for the advice. I did look before starting Ethereum mining and it was coming up at the top or nearly in whattomine. I have seen something about dual mining equihash with Ethereum and going to look into that further along with auto switching. Thanks again
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: New Rig - fluctuating hash rates is this normal please on: February 28, 2018, 08:38:33 PM
Thanks for all the advice, really appreciate all your help.

Knowing all is well is great and I have now been able to do some overclocking to get the hash rate up.

Now also going to look at dual-mining.

Thanks again for the help
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: New Rig - fluctuating hash rates is this normal please on: February 27, 2018, 11:14:49 PM
Thank you.

The calculated hash rate in nanopool is varying from 102 to 0 but the reported hash rate is static at 39. Realistically the 102 is impossible so I am presuming the calculated hash rate is simply unreliable?
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: New Rig - fluctuating hash rates is this normal please on: February 27, 2018, 08:58:11 PM
Thank you very much indeed

7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / New Rig - fluctuating hash rates is this normal please on: February 27, 2018, 08:47:01 PM
Hi,

I have new rig, first build, starting out with 2 * 1060 6gb cards.

I have followed guides and read a lot. I have got Claymore running in single mode with nanopool.

I am fining the hash rate on my GPU's is fluctuating quite a bit and having swapped risers, looked at system resources etc I can't seem to remedy it. Before I go crazy I just wondered if someone could let me know if there is an actual problem or if in fact this is what would be expected. I have posted a short extract from Claymore below.

I am very grateful for any advice.

Thank you

GPU0 t=59C fan=54%, GPU1 t=61C fan=56%
ETH: 02/27/18-20:34:25 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.378 Mh/s, Total Shares: 24, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 19.707 Mh/s, GPU1 19.671 Mh/s
ETH: 02/27/18-20:34:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ETH: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ETH: 02/27/18-20:34:38 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.409 Mh/s, Total Shares: 25, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:21
ETH: GPU0 19.696 Mh/s, GPU1 19.713 Mh/s
ETH: 02/27/18-20:34:47 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.371 Mh/s, Total Shares: 25, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:21
ETH: GPU0 19.675 Mh/s, GPU1 19.696 Mh/s
GPU0 t=59C fan=54%, GPU1 t=61C fan=56%
ETH: 02/27/18-20:35:04 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.354 Mh/s, Total Shares: 25, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:21
ETH: GPU0 19.673 Mh/s, GPU1 19.681 Mh/s
ETH: 02/27/18-20:35:12 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.450 Mh/s, Total Shares: 25, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:21
ETH: GPU0 19.706 Mh/s, GPU1 19.744 Mh/s
ETH: 02/27/18-20:35:17 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.398 Mh/s, Total Shares: 25, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:21
ETH: GPU0 19.683 Mh/s, GPU1 19.715 Mh/s
GPU0 t=59C fan=54%, GPU1 t=61C fan=56%
ETH: 02/27/18-20:35:34 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.358 Mh/s, Total Shares: 25, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:22
ETH: GPU0 19.678 Mh/s, GPU1 19.679 Mh/s
ETH: 02/27/18-20:35:34 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ETH: Share accepted (46 ms)!
GPU0 t=59C fan=54%, GPU1 t=62C fan=56%
ETH: 02/27/18-20:36:15 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.408 Mh/s, Total Shares: 26, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:22
ETH: GPU0 19.745 Mh/s, GPU1 19.663 Mh/s
GPU0 t=59C fan=54%, GPU1 t=61C fan=56%
ETH: 02/27/18-20:36:32 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.399 Mh/s, Total Shares: 26, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 19.717 Mh/s, GPU1 19.682 Mh/s
ETH: 02/27/18-20:36:42 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.453 Mh/s, Total Shares: 26, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 19.709 Mh/s, GPU1 19.743 Mh/s
ETH: 02/27/18-20:36:53 - New job from eth-eu1.nanopool.org:9999
ETH - Total Speed: 39.484 Mh/s, Total Shares: 26, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:23
ETH: GPU0 19.768 Mh/s, GPU1 19.716 Mh/s
GPU0 t=59C fan=54%, GPU1 t=62C fan=56%

Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!