 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
After many hours 29 ETN was added to my balance..
|
|
|
|
|
Been mining on eupool.electroneum.com (4% is too much) for a day @2kH/s. After the first block during mining (6 ETN pending) it took 21 hours until the next block was found in the pool (pool hash rate 482.77 KH/sec). Submitted 148903353 hashes before this next block was found. So far, no additional ETN appears to be assigned to my balance. What's going on??
|
|
|
|
|
I agree! All the best to you!
|
|
|
|
|
Given the circumstances, I've reached my goal! Did you?
|
|
|
|
I even wonder if everyone on the list is aware of this voting thread. As far as I know the link wasn't communicated @Quarktalk.
This would explain the participants with 0 votes.
Personally I would still make a classification between contestants, not based on ranking but based on effort!
In my case I spent over 150 hours of designing work to deliver everything you requested. Many did not, which is fine. That's also why I provided several suggestions and tried to convince everyone to make voting fair for over two months now. I was attacked for this from the beginning by participants who were not aware of the 'requirements' you defined.
There are many to blame, but it's just not worth it.
Everyone wants their back scratched in this thread. The fact of the matter is that you along with a half a dozen or so individuals CHEATED. We're not having to go back and redo everything because of the unjust and immoral actions of a few. The best you can do is step aside, and be glad you're getting anything at all..... If that's how you think about me then I have nothing to say to you anymore! You clearly define me as an unjust and immoral cheater! Shame on you! You can donate my share to the foundation! I FOUGHT AGAINST INJUSTICE! |
|
|
|
|
I wonder if everyone on the list is even aware of this voting thread. As far as I know the link wasn't communicated @Quarktalk.
This would explain the participants with 0 votes.
Personally I would make a classification between the contestants, not based on ranking but based on effort!
In my case I spent over 150 hours of designing work to deliver everything you requested. Many did not, which is fine. That's also why I provided several suggestions and tried to convince everyone to make voting fair for over two months now. I was attacked for this from the beginning by participants who were not aware of the 'requirements' you defined.
There are many to blame, but it's just not worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps not use a doc that is writeable to everyone. Someone removed some of my links just before voting started. Perhaps just send a pm with wallet address to FlipPro if he agrees.
|
|
|
|
If anyone cheated they should be removed from any winnings but I feel this would be impossible to prove with absolute clarity.
Give foundation 60k and split the remaining 60k between contestants feels fair as it's impossible to say who cheated and who didn't?
Would everyone be happy to hand over their work for this to be used as the kind donators see fit?
Foundation wins, contestants win and donators have a wealth of design to use as they see fit.
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Given the circumstances, if you do it like this I would split the 120k in half. 60k for the foundation and 60k for the participants. Then everyone can finally move on. Most important is this thing ends positive (in a way) for everyone who took serious effort.
My 2 Quarks..
|
|
|
|
Tnx a lot!  |
|
|
|
|
Great. Are you willing to share this background? I'd like to experiment with it a little.
|
|
|
|
|
Pick 4 (or so) favorite designs. Let the designers form a logo/branding team for the foundation. The logo/branding team provides consistent graphical elements required for all Quark related projects under development. (Gradually) fund this logo/branding team with the 120k quark. Win-Win for the community and the designers being part of the team!
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimist: Would you still pick my designs as your personal favorite? (no need to answer!)
I guess what I'm trying to say is, based on everything that happened, it's likely a vote now is not only based on the quality of a design but also carries an emotional aspect behind it. It could very be that this will just be part of the deal. Nonetheless, it is something to consider!
Credits to all of you who keep the positive tone and try to finally turn this thing around!
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it obvious? It's the cheaters that didn't tell they were cheating using shadow accounts bashing me!
|
|
|
|
|
One more time:
I did win the corrupt voting contest based on the rules set. To me that is clearly NOT winning the logo competition! I have clearly motivated my actions so no need to discuss them further.
If I'd win the full bounty based on the given rules, I'd choose to initiate a reboot of the contest to be managed in a fair way by the Foundation. That is if the Foundation agrees to it, which I believe they will.
If FlipPro/Foundation asks to me to step away from the competition based on my actions, I will respectfully withdraw from the competition!
|
|
|
|
|
I have no trouble resigning from the contest if desired by FlipPro and/or Foundation!
I feel pretty confident about my designs. I guess many would love to see me go so maybe I should do just that!
Winning Quarks is very nice, but exposing cheaters is priceless!
@assmasher you forgot to read my message from feb3 quoted on the previous page! My intentions were VERY clear from the start!
|
|
|
|
|
Btw, boxxl forgot to mention the 200 members named 'Kreon' in his list of fake accounts. I wonder why..
I monitored this new user thing too you know. If even more proof is desired, just let me know!
What bothers me is that they don't even have the guts to admit they cheated! Still hoping to get paid. It's telling..
|
|
|
|
@quarkfx Please just ignore him.. He only registered feb 4 after the cheating started and is most likely just another alter-ego used by one of the cheaters. It's all negativity and frustration. It's blatantly obvious they are trying to slaughter me over this.. I can imagine! |
|
|
|
|
Everyone seems to assume donating the whole thing to the Foundation is a bad thing where everybody loses. Why is that?
Some of us mentioned earlier it might be a good idea to reboot the contest, donate the 120k quark to the Foundation and let the Foundation manage the contest in a FAIR way.
The 120k should be reserved exclusively for the logo/branding contest and the logo would be officially accepted by the Foundation.
The only thing that worries me is the fact that it is pretty difficult now to vote neutrally.
|
|
|
|
|
?){kind=link}