Latest posts of: DomeDan

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Swepool.net]Pay-Per-Share, LP, JSON-API, SSL, Email Notify, Super Low Variance!

on: June 07, 2011, 08:21:20 PM

Quote from: dinox on June 05, 2011, 09:31:55 AM Quote from: DomeDan on June 05, 2011, 05:49:34 AM Yeah, I'm using poclbm. Followed parts of this tutorial: http://www.backtrack-linux.org/forums/backtrack-howtos/39969-how-gpu-bitcoin-mine-backtrack-4-your-hardware-could-now-pay-rent.html Okay.. You could try another miner, it seems like it is only you who have these problems. Can you try Phoenix/Diablominer and see if you get better stale rates there? Tried Phoenix and it works much better! thanks for the tip!

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Swepool.net]Pay-Per-Share, LP, JSON-API, SSL, Email Notify, Super Low Variance!

on: June 05, 2011, 05:49:34 AM

Yeah, I'm using poclbm. Followed parts of this tutorial: http://www.backtrack-linux.org/forums/backtrack-howtos/39969-how-gpu-bitcoin-mine-backtrack-4-your-hardware-could-now-pay-rent.html

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Swepool.net]Pay-Per-Share, LP, JSON-API, SSL, Email Notify, Super Low Variance!

on: June 05, 2011, 01:13:09 AM

Code:

PING swepool.net (213.180.92.21) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=3.55 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=3.36 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=3.27 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=3.57 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=3.48 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=3.34 ms

My speed is about 300Mhash/s and the statistics on the profile page shows 120-200 Mhash/s so I guess its about 50% stale.
haven't tried any other pool thought

Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [Swepool.net]Pay-Per-Share, LP, JSON-API, SSL, Email Notify, Super Low Variance!

on: June 03, 2011, 10:19:43 AM

I think he's talking about these problems:

Code:

03/06/2011 12:11:04, 2882a9d6, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:16, f3b48590, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:29, 1ef726a4, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:50, 99b14500, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:02, d0ff0b1c, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:13, 0896e3b5, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:26, ffd770d1, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:33, eef97afa, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:12:45, 0be8f5fb, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:12:45, long poll: new block 0000055b133324da

I'm not sure, but I think this is some problem with the pool, i thought it was because of my overclocking but have adjust it back and forth and still get "accepted" only about 50% of the time

Pages: [1]