Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi guys, i tried to find some data about the boost that -clkernel 3 offer for 8GB cards...really couldnt find any. Can anyone, please, share your results before and after -clkernel 3? At the moment im using RX 580 8GB and have 31.7 mhs. How much can i win with -clkernel 3? Also, does it use more power? Thank you. Have a nice day. Cheers!
|
|
|
GPUz shows 37% fan speed, same speed its shown in MSI Afterburner or even on the competitor Phoenix Miner. But Claymore says its 51% fan speed. So yeah, Claymores readings are broken. But that isnt really a problem, the hell. Leave it as it is.
|
|
|
6x Sapphire Nitro+ RX 580 8GB with Micron memory clocked at 1170/2200MHz with 850/850mv and -20% power limit doing 192.9 mhs eth at little under 810w. Using the nanopool i get average hashrates over the reported ones. (usually, 4 out of 7 days, in the rest, really close to reported, max 10 mhs less) PS: Check the GPUz reported consumption. 80w... Also check my highest temps which are 51 and 52* degrees celcius with the fan at only 37% in a warm room, around 25* today, for example. One last thing, no incorrect shares, not even 1 memory error reported in hwinfo, not one.
|
|
|
Its not ethermine, im on nanopool and its getting worse by the day, but the fault is from Claymore. I had almost same average hashrate like the reported, in many days even more, for weeks, with 10 to 10.6, but i was a fuckin idiot and changed to this shit 11.5 and i get 5 to 9 less mhs than reported... Its utterly and absolutly garbage. I will go back to 10.6...
|
|
|
Hi guys. On Claymore 10.6 i had 550 hours on a row on nanopool, last time i upgrade to 11.4 2 days ago, no issues and hashrate was +0.5 better sometimes and sometimes just -0.5 less than the reported, most of the time...i had more average than reported, which is crazy. I upgrade tot 11.4 and my average hashrate drop to around 5 to 6 mhs less... I check and note down my average 24 hours hashrate 3 times per day and in 550 hours i had the average almost as the reported. With 11.4 although i have it only for 2 days, i never went beyond 187.0 mhs although i have 192.9 reported...over 5 mhs average lost in the dark. So 11.4 is broken, something is working really bad right there. I will let it run one more day, but im sure the 11.4 is garbage, thats all and i will stay with 10.6. Good luck!
|
|
|
Waiting for mvddc, cvddc, cclock, mclock. But i tested it on stock freq and its better than Claymore. Ill wait for those commands to move to Phoenix. I dont like Afterburner, Overdriventool even less.
|
|
|
@PhoenixMiner - please research a bit the stale problem. With 2.5d i get 3, 4 even 5 times more stale vs. 2.4. Anyway, the miner is amazing, getting 6 mhs more from 192 to 198 mhs with 6 rx 580. Good job. Also, please add to the miner cclock, mclock, cvddc, mvddc and other commands from Claymore, it would be really awesome.
|
|
|
|