Latest posts of: tipztek

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash miner for CUDA GPUs (5.4.0)

on: February 26, 2018, 03:48:45 AM

Quote from: acepsuh on February 26, 2018, 03:20:31 AM

help .. whats wrong with my gpu using bminer ... before i am using dstm work fine and get 192 sol/s with my gtx 1060 3gb vga card ..but when i use bminer always 0 sol/s

Code:

[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:23-08:00] Bminer: When Crypto-mining Made Fast (v5.4.0-ae18e12) 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:23-08:00] Checking updates                            
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:25-08:00] Watchdog has 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:25-08:00] Starting miner on devices [0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:25-08:00] Starting miner on device 0...                
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:25-08:00] Started miner on device 0                    
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:25-08:00] Starting miner on device 1...                
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:25-08:00] Connected to btg.suprnova.cc:8816            
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:26-08:00] Started miner on device 1                    
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:26-08:00] Subscribed to stratum server                 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:26-08:00] Set nonce to c685fc07000000000000000007fc85c5 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:26-08:00] Set target to 8787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787870700 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:26-08:00] Received new job 5ed5                        
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:26-08:00] Authorized                                   
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:31-08:00] Starting miner on device 2...                
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:36-08:00] Started miner on device 2                    
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:36-08:00] Starting miner on device 3...                
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:45-08:00] Started miner on device 3                    
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:45-08:00] Starting miner on device 4...                
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:55-08:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 0.00 Sol/s 0.00 Nonce/s Temp: 42C Power: 28W 0.00 Sol/J 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:56-08:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 0.00 Sol/s 0.00 Nonce/s Temp: 42C Power: 28W 0.00 Sol/J 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:57-08:00] Started miner on device 4                    
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:10:57-08:00] Starting miner on device 5...                
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:06-08:00] Received new job 5ed6                        
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:07-08:00] [GPU 2] Speed: 0.00 Sol/s 0.00 Nonce/s Temp: 42C Power: 24W 0.00 Sol/J 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:11-08:00] Started miner on device 5                    
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:12-08:00] Starting miner on device 6...                
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:15-08:00] [GPU 3] Speed: 0.00 Sol/s 0.00 Nonce/s Temp: 38C Power: 25W 0.00 Sol/J 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:26-08:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 0.00 Sol/s 0.00 Nonce/s Temp: 39C Power: 28W 0.00 Sol/J 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:30-08:00] [GPU 1] Speed: 0.00 Sol/s 0.00 Nonce/s Temp: 39C Power: 28W 0.00 Sol/J 
[INFO] [2018-02-25T19:11:31-08:00] [GPU 4] Speed: 0.00 Sol/s 0.00 Nonce/s Temp: 39C Power: 24W 0.00 Sol/J

100% devfee

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash miner for CUDA GPUs (5.4.0)

on: February 15, 2018, 05:53:42 AM

Quote from: cryptoyes on February 15, 2018, 05:43:29 AM What a load a horseshite ... you continue to be totally vague, despite repeated requests for actual details and explanations. You must think we're all stupid. Let's see: Quote from: realbminer on February 14, 2018, 04:22:08 PM The first communication checks the update and receives license information, including for example where to mine devfee. Because of security reasons, it would be very hard to eliminate this private communication. Total BS. If that were true, all miners would require it. What security concerns? Explain it to the experts. I'm a dev myself. Let's hear it. Quote from: realbminer on February 14, 2018, 04:22:08 PM The follow-up communications only send runtime information of bminer, like the mining speed of each card and performance status. This may enable bminer to choose better optimization strategies. Complete BS. You don't need to call back home to enable optimizations. Build them into the executable like any sane developer. Quote from: realbminer on February 14, 2018, 04:22:08 PM I understand your concerns about the private connection. In future, I will consider making the follow-up runtime communications transparent. Or alternatively, I can create an option to opt-out the communications. Remove it. Can't you see it's the biggest reason why people hate you and your miner? Right now it all screams that you are shady. Sorry, but the repeated times you were called out on this and failed to provide details to reassure users all point to hidden interests. I've been working really hard to try to expose what's being sent back and forth to his servers, but he's gone to great lengths to protect it. So far, here's what I've found: This is the communication that occurs as soon as you start the miner (there's also some unprintable characters which I omitted, I believe this is encrypted info that I won't be able to break): GET https://api.bminer.me/v1/init/zec/520 HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: Go-http-client/1.1 Content-Type: application/octet-stream Accept-Encoding: gzip stratum+ssl://t1YmvsEuSkADkoYBqtwRt3aJ31GvZzF45fL.w@zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633/ -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIID/DCCAuagAwIBAgIID+rOSdTGfGcwCwYJKoZIhvcNAQELMIGLMQswCQYDVQQG EwJVUzEZMBcGA1UEChMQQ2xvdWRGbGFyZSwgSW5jLjE0MDIGA1UECxMrQ2xvdWRG bGFyZSBPcmlnaW4gU1NMIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTEWMBQGA1UEBxMN U2FuIEZyYW5jaXNjbzETMBEGA1UECBMKQ2FsaWZvcm5pYTAeFw0xNDExMTMyMDM4 NTBaFw0xOTExMTQwMTQzNTBaMIGLMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEZMBcGA1UEChMQQ2xv dWRGbGFyZSwgSW5jLjE0MDIGA1UECxMrQ2xvdWRGbGFyZSBPcmlnaW4gU1NMIENl cnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTEWMBQGA1UEBxMNU2FuIEZyYW5jaXNjbzETMBEG A1UECBMKQ2FsaWZvcm5pYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEB AMBIlWf1KEKR5hbB75OYrAcUXobpD/AxvSYRXr91mbRu+lqE7YbyyRUShQh15lem ef+umeEtPZoLFLhcLyczJxOhI+siLGDQm/a/UDkWvAXYa5DZ+pHU5ct5nZ8pGzqJ p8G1Hy5RMVYDXZT9F6EaHjMG0OOffH6Ih25TtgfyyrjXycwDH0u6GXt+G/rywcqz /9W4Aki3XNQMUHNQAtBLEEIYHMkyTYJxuL2tXO6ID5cCsoWw8meHufTeZW2DyUpl yP3AHt4149RQSyWZMJ6AyntL9d8Xhfpxd9rJkh9Kge2iV9rQTFuE1rRT5s7OSJcK xUsklgHcGHYMcNfNMilNHb8CAwEAAaNmMGQwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgAGMBIGA1Ud EwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFCToU1ddfDRAh6nrlNu64RZ4/CmkMB8G A1UdIwQYMBaAFCToU1ddfDRAh6nrlNu64RZ4/CmkMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEBCwOCAQEA cQDBVAoRrhhsGegsSFsv1w8v27zzHKaJNv6ffLGIRvXK8VKKK0gKXh2zQtN9SnaD gYNe7Pr4C3I8ooYKRJJWLsmEHdGdnYYmj0OJfGrfQf6MLIc/11bQhLepZTxdhFYh QGgDl6gRmb8aDwk7Q92BPvek5nMzaWlP82ixavvYI+okoSY8pwdcVKobx6rWzMWz ZEC9M6H3F0dDYE23XcCFIdgNSAmmGyXPBstOe0aAJXwJTxOEPn36VWr0PKIQJy5Y 4o1wpMpqCOIwWc8J9REV/REzN6Z1LXImdUgXIXOwrz56gKUJzPejtBQyIGj0mveX Fu6q54beR89jDc+oABmOgg== -----END CERTIFICATE----- I'm reasonably sure this is Nanopool's cert which he uses explicitly to prevent cert forging and MITM attacks on his devfee. This is the communication that occurs every 10-15 minutes or so (note the content length is way higher than the content which means im missing stuff, possibly speeds): POST https://api.bminer.me/v1/stats/zec/520 HTTP/1.1 Host: api.bminer.me User-Agent: Go-http-client/1.1 Content-Length: 727 Content-Type: application/octet-stream Accept-Encoding: gzip Connection: close Linux* GenuineIntel GeForce GTX 1080 9GB (GPU-5bea6e5b-1234-4321-abab-12b7e7a78789 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 1080 9GB (GPU-5bea6e5b-1234-4321-abab-12b7e7a78789 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 1080 9GB (GPU-5bea6e5b-1234-4321-abab-12b7e7a78789 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 1080 9GB (GPU-5bea6e5b-1234-4321-abab-12b7e7a78789 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 1080 9GB (GPU-5bea6e5b-1234-4321-abab-12b7e7a78789 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 1080 9GB (GPU-5bea6e5b-1234-4321-abab-12b7e7a78789 0000:00:00.0 Make your own opinions I guess. cc. @cryptoyes

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash miner for CUDA GPUs (5.3.0)

on: February 08, 2018, 09:36:12 AM

Hi all, here is a partial request for his "licensing and runtime" to api.bminer.me every 10-15 minutes. POST https://api.bminer.me/v1/stats/zec/520 HTTP/1.1 Host: api.bminer.me User-Agent: Go-http-client/1.1 Content-Length: 727 Content-Type: application/octet-stream Accept-Encoding: gzip Connection: close Linux* GenuineIntel GeForce GTX 10XX XGB (GPU-00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 10XX XGB (GPU-00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 10XX XGB (GPU-00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 10XX XGB (GPU-00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 10XX XGB (GPU-00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 0000:00:00.0 GeForce GTX 10XX XGB (GPU-00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 0000:00:00.0 Replace all the zeroes with your GPU's UUID and PCI position, replace X's with your model. I believe there was also speed in there, but I'm not sure. It's difficult to reconstruct this shit.

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash miner for CUDA GPUs (5.3.0)

on: February 08, 2018, 08:32:26 AM

Quote from: realbminer on February 07, 2018, 10:24:19 PM Quote from: cryptoyes on February 07, 2018, 09:59:25 PM Apology accepted. But you're still not taking into account PPLNS, a reason why I suggested you do some reading (not all shares you submit are paid, not all blocks are equal in either length or difficulty, not all last N shares span a single block, etc). it seems bminer was faster ... but as was pointed out earlier, @realbminer could have just watched this thread and tweaked with the fee to make it 2% faster by removing the fee for the duration of that test for all we know. It is the most untrustworthy and suspicious miner out there, hands down. Add that @realbminer didn't address the questions and you have an explanation why people are not trusting this miner and are sticking with dstm's. Remove the private connection if you want to be taken (more) seriously. Thanks for "gaining" me the ability to tweak devfees on-the-fly. Any evidences to back it up your claims? The tests have been done multiple times by different people and the results and the results are pretty consistent. The evidence is your unwillingness to let requests to api.bminer.me happen in the clear.

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bminer: a fast Equihash miner for CUDA GPUs (5.2.0)

on: January 31, 2018, 10:00:10 PM

Quote from: letrevian on January 31, 2018, 04:28:53 PM Quote from: letrevian on January 29, 2018, 10:24:23 PM Any comments on Bminer contacting 104.31.68.221:443/104.31.69.221:443 regularly? Quoting myself so perhaps this gets a response from the developer. Well, I'm not the dev but pretty sure I have your answer. nslookup bminer.me Name: bminer.me Address: 104.31.68.221 Name: bminer.me Address: 104.31.69.221 Also, my connection sucks so sometimes I get the following, purportedly because I lose connection to the internets all the time): Checking updates Failed to read from the network: Get https://api.bminer.me/v1/init/zec/520: net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers) Checking updates Navigating to that link gives us the following content: stratum+ssl://t1YmvsEuSkADkoYBqtwRt3aJ31GvZzF45fL.w@zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633/ -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIID/DCCAuagAwIBAgIID+rOSdTGfGcwCwYJKoZIhvcNAQELMIGLMQswCQYDVQQG EwJVUzEZMBcGA1UEChMQQ2xvdWRGbGFyZSwgSW5jLjE0MDIGA1UECxMrQ2xvdWRG bGFyZSBPcmlnaW4gU1NMIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTEWMBQGA1UEBxMN U2FuIEZyYW5jaXNjbzETMBEGA1UECBMKQ2FsaWZvcm5pYTAeFw0xNDExMTMyMDM4 NTBaFw0xOTExMTQwMTQzNTBaMIGLMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEZMBcGA1UEChMQQ2xv dWRGbGFyZSwgSW5jLjE0MDIGA1UECxMrQ2xvdWRGbGFyZSBPcmlnaW4gU1NMIENl cnRpZmljYXRlIEF1dGhvcml0eTEWMBQGA1UEBxMNU2FuIEZyYW5jaXNjbzETMBEG A1UECBMKQ2FsaWZvcm5pYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEB AMBIlWf1KEKR5hbB75OYrAcUXobpD/AxvSYRXr91mbRu+lqE7YbyyRUShQh15lem ef+umeEtPZoLFLhcLyczJxOhI+siLGDQm/a/UDkWvAXYa5DZ+pHU5ct5nZ8pGzqJ p8G1Hy5RMVYDXZT9F6EaHjMG0OOffH6Ih25TtgfyyrjXycwDH0u6GXt+G/rywcqz /9W4Aki3XNQMUHNQAtBLEEIYHMkyTYJxuL2tXO6ID5cCsoWw8meHufTeZW2DyUpl yP3AHt4149RQSyWZMJ6AyntL9d8Xhfpxd9rJkh9Kge2iV9rQTFuE1rRT5s7OSJcK xUsklgHcGHYMcNfNMilNHb8CAwEAAaNmMGQwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgAGMBIGA1Ud EwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQIwHQYDVR0OBBYEFCToU1ddfDRAh6nrlNu64RZ4/CmkMB8G A1UdIwQYMBaAFCToU1ddfDRAh6nrlNu64RZ4/CmkMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEBCwOCAQEA cQDBVAoRrhhsGegsSFsv1w8v27zzHKaJNv6ffLGIRvXK8VKKK0gKXh2zQtN9SnaD gYNe7Pr4C3I8ooYKRJJWLsmEHdGdnYYmj0OJfGrfQf6MLIc/11bQhLepZTxdhFYh QGgDl6gRmb8aDwk7Q92BPvek5nMzaWlP82ixavvYI+okoSY8pwdcVKobx6rWzMWz ZEC9M6H3F0dDYE23XcCFIdgNSAmmGyXPBstOe0aAJXwJTxOEPn36VWr0PKIQJy5Y 4o1wpMpqCOIwWc8J9REV/REzN6Z1LXImdUgXIXOwrz56gKUJzPejtBQyIGj0mveX Fu6q54beR89jDc+oABmOgg== -----END CERTIFICATE----- So I can only suspect it connects to that IP regularly to update the software and relay the connection string for the dev fee in case he wants to change it. It could also be used for some nefarious purpose like transferring all your files and private keys to his server, who knows. That's the risk with closed source.

Pages: [1]