Most likely it was 51% attack like recently in BottleCaps.
But I also found this in official code:
Old and good parameters:
static const int64_t nGenesisBlockRewardCoin = 10000 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardStartCoin = 5 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardMinimumCoin = .011 * COIN;
New version with wrong parameters:
static const int64_t nGenesisBlockRewardCoin = 1 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardStartCoin = 2048 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardMinimumCoin = 1 * COIN;
Can you elaborate, please?
I transferred some OFF to cryptopia succesfully, nothing is wrong. Just some misinformation on Cryptopia.
Are you absolutely certain there's no 51% attack? There has been a huge dump on Cryptopia which could be the cause of double spends, and the nodelist on the website isn't very comforting as every node is on a different height according to it.
Show Posts
