Bitcoin Forum
September 26, 2024, 01:47:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 47535 funded addresses. 2,109,255 txs. 5 block explorers on: April 04, 2018, 05:01:14 AM
Just post the announcement on Steemit (rejecting reward)...

https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@ciag/announcement-mooncoin-reborn-extracted-from-the-telegram-group
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 47535 funded addresses. 2,109,255 txs. 5 block explorers on: April 03, 2018, 01:47:53 AM
Any chance to apply MoonCoin here: https://www.coinex.com/vote

3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 47535 funded addresses. 2,109,255 txs. 5 block explorers on: March 23, 2018, 09:03:42 PM
Mooncoin now listed on Satowallet mobile Android wallet and Exchange . Enjoy Zero transaction fees

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.satowallet

Satowallet said:

“IOS should be available in a week time according to Apple team “
Roll Eyes


Good afternoon ! Positive news ! I believe that we will have more soon.  Smiley

Any news about the new dev?
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 47535 funded addresses. 2,109,255 txs. 5 block explorers on: March 21, 2018, 03:59:59 AM
Any chance to get MoonCoin listed here... https://www.cryptaldash.com/new-coin-listing

Is a new Cryptocurrency Exchange https://www.cryptaldash.com/ ... According to the roadmap live trading starts in April 2018.
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 47535 funded addresses. 2,109,255 txs. 5 block explorers on: March 21, 2018, 02:09:14 AM
The main argument from some governments against crypto now is that crypto doesn't serve any socially useful function.
Let's make Mooncoin be truly socially useful. Then their argument will not work.
With projects on top of Mooncoin blockchain, that will help scientific and social progress (even if just little at the beginning, not sending expeditions to Moon or Mars and not solving all world problems at once),
Mooncoin can become a recognised coin, oriented for helping progress, e.g. for educational purposes like Evangelo suggested in the past.
And not only for educational purposes. It can be (for example) promoting of existing or new good scientific and social ideas, initiatives, small or medium projects - with help of Mooncoin blockchain (without bloating it, of course).
That is what SmartLikes can be used for (other than for liking anything with SmartLikes).

What if we find a way to use MoonCoin to support NGO's or some charities... I have not seen anything exclusively oriented that way... maybe focus smarlikes to those kind of institutions around the world.
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [MOON] Mooncoin 44495 funded addresses. 2,064,149 txs. 5 block explorers on: March 12, 2018, 03:35:44 AM

Some FACTS:

- When 'Vassilis' was first brought on, I made him aware, in several instances, that there was a pre-existing donation fund for MOON developers (DAF) that has been fully functioning (still is!) since last June and had paid out to barrysty1e several times in the past. He made it clear he wasn't interested in receiving donations and stated several times that he'd prefer if donations go to other MOON related projects or initiatives. WHY WOULD HE THEN CREATE A NEW PERSONAL DONATION ADDRESS FOR HIMSELF A FEW WEEKS AFTER THESE CONVERSATIONS? And then 3 days after creating that donation address, the supposedly 'frozen' 62B moves directly into it? This is *factual and provable* that these things happened, the chat logs exist and the dates coincide.

He could be not interested in Discord donations, but to be interested in Bitcointalk donations from old investors, or for whatever reason he didn't want to depend on your donations, that's why he could post his Mooncoin address at Bitcointalk only, many people read the forum. Anyway let's think: if we believe that he deliberately posted an address at his Bitcointalk signature to get somehow (in an unknown way) 62B coins, why did he need posting an address at all? Obviously, he could just send coins to any other his address (without making it known in public), then he would have no problems, because no one could prove or even know that it's his address. Then he could send these coins to thousand small addresses or dump them instantly.

- Mooncoin_Foundation spoke to me via PM here regarding bringing 'Vassilis' on and various other MOON related things back in December. He stated that 'Smart Likes is almost ready'. I have the PM showing this. Some questions: Who is/are developing it? What is your support structure? When do you expect to have a test alpha up and running and who will be testing it? GitHub link? Why has *nobody* heard of this project being worked on in earnest? In other words, why would you provide false information to me about Smart Likes being worked on at all? I'm guessing because you wanted my support to convince the Community to switch over to the new wallet with as few issues as possible. And like the trusting idiot I apparently am, I bought into it.

The info was correct. I sent a PM to you, because I don't read Discord, and I knew that you were almost the only Discord member, who also was active at Bitcointalk.
Evangelo, Zareeth, BigMoon... they were not active any longer. So I just shared the important info about a new dev with you, to be sure that a Discord community knows and discusses it.
I hope that Mooncoin community will be testing SmartLikes soon, in this March or April. In next days I will explain everything in detail.
In short: SmartLikes is a mindblowing idea, which can be implemented in several ways. There were some attempts (test mode) since 2016. The community was involved with discussing and testing. The most difficult thing is to choose how to implement it, in which way, it must be EXTREMELY SIMPLE or people will not understand and will not use it.
If not this situation with 62B, Vassilis could implement it already in January-February.  SmartLikes will not need a separate Github. More details soon.
Also you told that you 'bought into it'. As far as I remember, the MOON price was 0.3-0.5 Satoshi when Vassilis came. Now it's 1-2 Satoshi.



- The 'Foundation' group wasn't even made known to anyone outside of it until the 62B disappeared. Suddenly, 6+ months after the creation of the Discord, Telegram and other social media outlets, they appear! Not to help anyone in the Community directly, but to attempt rebutting the oddities and logical fallacies I keep bringing up out in the open as all these events have unfolded. Well, now I'm here in the ANN and you can address them for everyone else here to see as well. As far as I can tell, the only interest the 'Foundation' has is self interest; the group is comprised of those who hold the largest wallets in, previous or current.


What is Foundation group? If you mean agswinner, coinflow - they were known to Bitcointalk people since 2014.
Again, it's not a group, rather separate individuals. Maybe with the same philosophy of decentralisation.
Coinflow is a miner, agswinner is a main investor.


I'm entirely transparent and have facts and truth on my side, besides STILL having the Community's best interests at heart. RE: NON MONETARY INTERESTS.

That's a good approach. If it's your true approach, finally you will find the truth about the Mooncoin project. It's not so bad and it's really a very rare project.
You already spent 9 months, some people here spent 4 years. Many weak guys come and go, if you stay and really with this approach, finally you will win. If there is a some shadow group working under 'Foundation', please let me know facts. I can say that in 2015 when almost no one cared about Mooncoin, it was an idea of Foundation to protect investors, some people even told they wanted to be members of the Foundation and called themselves members, but it never was started officially, no any agreements, papers, signed contracts etc. I will explain later why it was not a good idea for a decentralised project. My mistake was to start a 'collective' Bitcointalk account with a name 'Foundation'. When I was new to Mooncoin, I believed it could help people, but in fact, in decentralised projects like Mooncoin where you control nothing, and where it's extremely hard to make anyone do anything and even if something even little is done, even absolutely without you, then be ready to be accused for everything which didn't depend on you at all. Decentralised project is a good challenge though. 9 months of experience in decentralisation is not little.
In next posts I will try to explain to everyone in detail how the project works, based on my own experience.




After your PM to Vassilis... is there any chance to get a new dev, re start this project all over again and keep looking at the future? let's look at the half full of the glass... i'm sick of fights and discussions for the 62B moon.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!