Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3
|
I will spend 4000000 doge to play this POL first 80000 doge got!
|
|
|
Hello, there are updates on the function POS? for now it does not work, will be implemented?
The POS works well, if you did not have enough coins there may be difficult to get interest by stake mining.... The current dificulty is very high now.. It seemed like after I had more than 10k Hayek the POS kicked in, but it could be that I did not leave the wallet running long enough before. The coindays should be large enough to POS. I think
|
|
|
only 1 node seed in the chat network it is not dead
|
|
|
The market is recovering ,come on ,DEV,add new feature into CHAT,it's a big big oppotunity for CHAT,for the market lack such a social coin after tac died.
what chatcoin should do now is to wait the tac die and pump the price
|
|
|
seem this coin is dead, not sync anymore...
new wallet is working auto sync now..
|
|
|
Defending a scam equals doing evil to the innocent investors. Truth will prevail against evil!!!!!!
but it seems chat coin is not the future You are quite right,sorry for my stupid sig.I'll delete it and try to be objective. I am here to make tac scam clear and am one of the investors I agree with you . I Invest 10 BTC! Talkcoin is a real scam! I never thought the dev can get coins at more than 40% donation!
|
|
|
Value vote2(const Array& params, bool fHelp) { if (fHelp || params.size() != 1) throw runtime_error( "votedev <percentage>\n" "Percentage to be given to developers 0-10");
if (nSubsidy <= 0) throw JSONRPCError(RPC_CLIENT_NOT_CONNECTED, "Invalid Subsidy");
if (!(params[0].get_real() >= 0 && params[0].get_real() <= 10)) throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER, "Invalid Percentage");
int64 nVote2 = nSubsidy * params[0].get_real() / 100;
CChatcoinAddress address(GetVote2Addr()); if (!address.IsValid()) throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid Chatcoin address");
// Amount int64 nAmount = GetVote2Value();
// Wallet comments CWalletTx wtx; wtx.mapValue["to"] = GetVote2Lbl();
if (pwalletMain->IsLocked()) throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");
string strError = pwalletMain->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, false, nVote2); if (strError != "") throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);
return wtx.GetHash().GetHex(); } what's this?
|
|
|
我们为什么要支持chatcoin而不是talkcoin。请大家先仔细考虑:
虚拟货币的核心价值在哪儿? 这一点我想大家都明白:去中心化,规则确定,无人可以操控产量。
而这一点恰恰是talkcoin所不具有的,为什么这么说呢我的分析如下:
首先看talkcoin的特点: 1,投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制每个区块的产量。 2,投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制作者每个区块的奖励数。
3,这个地址的私钥显然只有作者有。虽然作者说某一天会把投票的币发到一个没有私钥的地址。而一个地址有没有私钥是不能被证明的(如果能够轻易证明一个地址没有私钥那就意味着你可以很容易的计算出任何地址的私钥,因为由私钥可以推导地址而反过来去不可以)
通过这两点可以得到这样的结果: 1,如果作者想增加产量的时候无论币价格多么高,也无论投票数目由多少作者都有足够的货币投票。很显然作者的币是可以无限制循环使用在投票上的。 2,如果作者想增加自己获得的份额也可以使用投票决定。(作者很阴险,从来没有公开过talkcoin的作者捐献规则)。这已经被证实了作者在某些区块将自己获得的份额提高的了40% 显然 这样的一个币,是不适合长期投资的
如果你坚信这样的一个币你必须承担道德危机.
请注意一点:人性是贪婪的!
所以请支持chatcoin
|
|
|
我们为什么要支持chatcoin而不是talkcoin。请大家先仔细考虑: 虚拟货币的核心价值在哪儿? 这一点我想大家都明白:去中心化,规则确定,无人可以操控产量。 而这一点恰恰是talkcoin所不具有的,为什么这么说呢我的分析如下: 首先看talkcoin的特点: 1,投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制每个区块的产量。 2,投票时每个人都可以通过发送一定的币到某个地址而控制作者每个区块的奖励数。 3,这个地址的私钥显然只有作者有。虽然作者说某一天会把投票的币发到一个没有私钥的地址。而一个地址有没有私钥是不能被证明的(如果能够轻易证明一个地址没有私钥那就意味着你可以很容易的计算出任何地址的私钥,因为由私钥可以推导地址而反过来去不可以) 通过这两点可以得到这样的结果: 1,如果作者想增加产量的时候无论币价格多么高,也无论投票数目由多少作者都有足够的货币投票。很显然作者的币是可以无限制循环使用在投票上的。 2,如果作者想增加自己获得的份额也可以使用投票决定。(作者很阴险,从来没有公开过talkcoin的作者捐献规则)。这已经被证实了作者在某些区块将自己获得的份额提高的了40% 显然 这样的一个币,是不适合长期投资的 如果你坚信这样的一个币你必须承担道德危机. 请注意一点:人性是贪婪的! 所以请支持chatcoin
区块浏览器: Thanks to Cryptocoinunion. http://chat.cryptocoinunion.com 矿池https://chat.maxminers.net 钱包Windows: linux64: https://mega.co.nz/#!aZgz3boL!SwEkZxNX_GWowJKZg1kZlJI6DQ_QsOIsYxkzTNdxDnE windows: https://mega.co.nz/#!7ZJkWBqb!4lwVqf1PekwL2jotMpAhs2qfJVHGDhJWH7tRHgUMsvY 源文件: https://mega.co.nz/#!6VgxhaLQ!IL6vb4PxRlgG-dbInru1zrKS_hkD1EphPRxJuIUdiPA GITHUB: https://github.com/chatcoin/Chatcoin-wallet.git
|
|
|
Wrong. Dev's wallet (TgD7ERrggBPezx6JPP2bpWjAFQW1rafzCn) has gained no more than 6%. I implore you to get your facts straight. All of these baseless accusations are hackneyed. But I suppose the weak minded must entertain themselves somehow. Most important is it can be increase to 50% if he will.
|
|
|
@djm34 If you have solid evidence to prove what you said,show us, if not,shut up. Please act like a professional,if you are the one . The fact that you ask for evidence is a proof on itself @djm34 Stupid and shameless developper of sg-tac,you are so cute and childish,love you ,baby~~ I should thank you on behave of djm34. The fact is all miners for Nist5 using his creation, that includes your beloved Chatcoin If talkcoin remove vote its still a good coin or it will die.....
|
|
|
lol, you really have nothing to do of your days I will let you here alone here, I want to shoot birds today (with a camera... ) and quite frankly even if talkcoin was to die, it wouldn't make Chatcoin successful. You have basically no idea on how or what to code and I don't think you have the ability. Your problem is that you only exist in the shadow of Talkcoin. So if talkcoin disappears, its shadow will disappear too... It is a pity that your are too stupid to realize that. Yeah,you are right,talkcoin is going to die.that's why I came here -- to witness the whole dying proccess of a scam,from which we all can learn a good lesson,right? Life is boring,seeing sth different makes life colorful. It is more than 40% not 25%!
|
|
|
Vote is most likely to be a scam. Chatcoin is actually a 100% POW coin ,which is rare in the new-coin market
The Talkcoin team can make money by vote the charity at any time it is really a scam.... hope Chatcoin Dev can seize this oppotunity to catch up with TAC in market cap This need community promotion....
|
|
|
Vote is most likely to be a scam. Chatcoin is actually a 100% POW coin ,which is rare in the new-coin market
The Talkcoin team can make money by vote the charity at any time it is really a scam....
|
|
|
hey i can read fluently. rpccommand -votedev yeah, that means both the reward and charity ratio can be controlled by the DEV! Why did not you say it first? Another fucking bad design! this is the bug, the dev can vote for free , this considering the DEV only, may be one day the donation will be 15TAC again!! It is not reliable anymore!
How the dev could control it alone while you could vote too? It's the same like complaining about a bad politician who controls the gov while you never go to vote. The fee is around 3% since more than one month, I remember it well because I researched about this too when I decide to join the project. He's is just a big troll. I don't argue with trolls. I add, I don't vote/chat for free, all chat fees and voting fees are be removed from circulation and sent to first genesis. hey guy, your angry solve nothing! frankly you say nothing about the problem since the beginning you just want to hide something.
|
|
|
hey i can read fluently. rpccommand -votedev yeah, that means both the reward and charity ratio can be controlled by the DEV! Why did not you say it first? Another fucking bad design! this is the bug, the dev can vote for free , this considering the DEV only, may be one day the donation will be 15TAC again!! It is not reliable anymore!
How the dev could control it alone while you could vote too? It's the same like complaining about a bad politician who controls the gov while you never go to vote. The fee is around 3% since more than one month, I remember it well because I researched about this too when I decide to join the project. hey, the dev have the privatekey of the vote address..... he can vote for free. no matter how expensive the TAC is!!
|
|
|
you said" - Instead of having a premine, you are essentially donating a small percentage to fund the development of the coin. This approach is better as premines because it doesn't dump a ton of coin at launch and the developpment is not being abandoned."
hey guy, more than 30 is a small percentage?
you said" - Users can reduce donation to zero if they are not happy with the developement, there is a rpc command, and it's not hidden.
As i know if Users reduce donation to zero the blocks mined by pools will be rejected by the network. please do not try to cheating the community again!
You just forgot to copy/paste the most important. As i know if Users reduce donation to zero the blocks mined by pools will be rejected by the network. please do not try to cheating the community again!
It's funny if you can't understand that... And with you big red letters, you are just a troll like zxbball reapting the same things over again, and it becomes tiring. You can control the charity ratio through vote! you can make money at any time Your reply worth nothing!
|
|
|
From block 90720 to 105808, the reward perblock is 33.66 TAC per block, but the dev get 15.46 TAC per BLOCK!
zhiwufy if you don't understand English I could get a translator for you in Chinese. You asked something and we gave you an answer. No need to repeat things again and again. I have checked the code again and found nothing suspicious about the block reward https://github.com/talkcoin/talkcoin-wallet/blob/master/src/main.cppFrom block 90720 to 105808, in this voting period someone has voted 30% dev fee. ( with rpccommand -votedev ) If you insists, it is our fault not reading the original OP, me included too. Andy aka Talkteam joins the project later and create this thread, he might overread this fee too and doesn't include this in the new OP. Here are from the original OP https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573998.0Namely, users can vote the amount of coins to be given to developers in each block that they found. This policy allows better communication between community and project development team. If you want to give 1%, 2% or 3% you choose! The default value is 1%. Note: you also can reduce donation to zero!
hey i can read fluently. rpccommand -votedev yeah, that means both the reward and charity ratio can be controlled by the DEV! Why did not you say it first? Another fucking bad design! this is the bug, the dev can vote for free , this considering the DEV only, may be one day the donation will be 15TAC again!! It is not reliable anymore!
|
|
|
http://tac.dwarfchain.com/Currency Code Block Time Reward Started Age (days) Coins Created Coins Available Avg Coin Age % CoinDD Talkcoin TAC 360177 2014-08-11 13:10:06 15.37 + 0.53(dev) 2014-03-03 160.924 8001916.1 7998802.3 35.9361 36.3812% problems? you'd better explain the relationship between the reward to miners and the dev! how a 15 TAC charity per block was generated!!! Or else you are unable to stop the dump!
|
|
|
From block 90720 to 105808, the reward perblock is 33.66 TAC per block, but the dev get 15.46 TAC per BLOCK!
Do you know to read? And I am not the one who get all coins, there is a team and coins are shared among the team, talkteam, aizensou, djm, karimdr2, guozi, catchcoin and many other ppl got many coins for their contribution. We did not care the coins number WE CARE IS: YOU CAN MANIPULATE THE REWARD AND THE CHARITY CAN BE MORE THAN 40%! AND YOU DID NOT WANT TO SAY HOW THIS WAS GENERATED! IF YOU WANT US TO IGNORE THIS PROBLEM, PLEASE LET TAILKCOIN DIE!You are reapting the same things over again, you don t know to read I guess. I've already explained this. you said"- Instead of having a premine, you are essentially donating a small percentage to fund the development of the coin. This approach is better as premines because it doesn't dump a ton of coin at launch and the developpment is not being abandoned." hey guy, more than 30 is a small percentage? you said"- Users can reduce donation to zero if they are not happy with the developement, there is a rpc command, and it's not hidden. As i know if Users reduce donation to zero the blocks mined by pools will be rejected by the network. please do not try to cheating the community again!
|
|
|
|