I see more and more comments about community losing patience with Bitcoin developments. One result of it was the creation of Bitcoin Cash which increased the block size of Bitcoin but it seems it is not enough. I wonder why they did not created from the beginning a block size of 100MB, 200 or maybe 300MB? Why limit themselves to 8MB? By having bigger block size wouldn't they fix the issues of speed and scalability...
I learned recently (here on a different post answered) that are concerns of decentralization as a result of larger block. What if somebody could solve the concerns of decentralization in a larger block? How valuable this will be?

Maybe a stupid question, but wouldn't a block size of 100 MB 200 or even 300MB fix a lot of issues with the speed, transaction fees and so on? This is not taking in consideration?

Hello Gavin, what a new blockchain should have to spark your interest? I mean what should it be capable of and futures you would expect?

Perhaps if Bitcoin will improve and be able to offer real scalability then it can remain the king of crypto. What do you think a block size of 100 MB, 200 or even 300MB can solve the problem? Is that even possible? And if somebody will be able to do will this be beneficial or will make no difference?