 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Let's make a short list of Exchanges and pool our resources to get it listed on one or two more. I have heard these mentioned: add Exchange By Vote... Exchanges : Tradesatoshi, CCEX, Mercatox, Livecoin |
|
|
|
btm on polo never be fixed and no more news about new exchange... dev no action on polo
"never be fixed"  In my view, the market itself is doing rather great and there's much potential for huge uptrend. Apart from your FUD, imagine a scenario where Polo wallet gets fixed and Bittrex adds BTM. It would go chasing much higher prices than we've seen this year quickly. Understandably Polo has pissed off many, but some are way too dramatic about it. The reality is that Poloniex staff is likely drowning in a mountain of things to do. There are other coins, like Steem Dollars, which is also stuck in the same situation. Wallet being fixed on developers end, but Polo still not up to date with things to do. Remember, it has taken Polo approximately 2 months to respond to simple support tickers. Therefore I'd assume that this would be their general communications lag, including with things like restoring wallets. If you think about it, having a few markets closed is a big problem for the projects themselves, sure. And from the project developers and supporters point of view it's dramatic.... But I'd hardly imagine it would be high up in Poloniex' priorities task list to fix couple low volume coins withdrawal functionality comparing to other things they need to get done. When you stop being dramatic for a while and have some perspective... At least to me personally, the situation is way more promising with upside rather than doom and gloom you offer. FriendlyAlliance, what a good level headed post! Indeed, Polo's own issues with lack of resources is well documented i.e. their own announcements section. I trust Polo to do the right thing in the end, because historically they always have done. |
|
|
|
So from reading slack I see the lead dev of this project is " melvster" on here. He says his and many more accounts were hacked and he is not able to reply on this forum. theymos has not responded to his request for a password reset to his email. This is true, just look at his posts before hack until Nov, 2016 were high information posts. After Feb, 2017, it's all hacker's spam. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=545;sa=showPostsSo, if people want him to post here, they need to ask theymos to reset his password to his real gmail address. |
|
|
|
Does someone know why is polo on maintenance? This is now for severela days.
Is there a wallet update or something else?
Thanks.
Best raise a ticket with polo, surely only their answer is valid, not on here. |
|
|
|
I remember I put you on ignore since you and your fellow trolls pumped and dumped crave with bob surplus. We all know that bitmark is based off Tim Burns Lee's solid project, Melvin will even tell you him self, if you look at pictures you so kindly tried to use as FUD, you'll see that BTM is " 10 commits ahead of solid" written by Melvin. People like you really are disgusting with your shill accounts, be a man and use your regular account, stop shilling to get people to dump, that really is quite sick. Back to ignore for you. Ah, you saw through it too.  Melvin Carvalho is a genius. Who or what is "YourMother"  |
|
|
|
Believe YourMother at your own risk. Sad that they stoop to such lies just to sink the market price 10%.  Clear to me it's a poster telling lies. Proof and admission below.  The guy forked the Solid project into a repository called bitmark-storage and now he's using git pull upstream to take other peoples' work and give the impression that bitmark is under development when in fact this shitcoin has stopped being developed since 2015 (if you don't count the 2016 commits on readme files and protocol version bumps) . Even his newest bitmark-app repository is just an empty electron instance One search can answer this. https://solid.mit.edu/"Meet Our Team" Melvin Carvalho is listed as contributor to Solid, along with Tim Berners-Lee. Conclusion, Bitmark developer is also working on an MIT Project with the man who invented the World Wide Web, and leveraging his own work in Bitmark Storage development. I knew this already, but the Bitmark blockchain has nothing to do with the Solid protocol. Bizarre reply. You knew already that what you said was the opposite of the truth. You admit you were lying. Solid is his work, so is Bitmark Storage. |
|
|
|
The guy forked the Solid project into a repository called bitmark-storage and now he's using git pull upstream to take other peoples' work and give the impression that bitmark is under development when in fact this shitcoin has stopped being developed since 2015 (if you don't count the 2016 commits on readme files and protocol version bumps) . Even his newest bitmark-app repository is just an empty electron instance One search can answer this. https://solid.mit.edu/"Meet Our Team" Melvin Carvalho is listed as contributor to Solid, along with Tim Berners-Lee. Conclusion, Bitmark developer is also working on an MIT Project with the man who invented the World Wide Web, and leveraging his own work in Bitmark Storage development. I knew this already, but the Bitmark blockchain has nothing to do with the Solid protocol. Bizarre reply. You knew already that what you said was the opposite of the truth. You admit you were lying. Solid is his work, so is Bitmark Storage. |
|
|
|
The guy forked the Solid project into a repository called bitmark-storage and now he's using git pull upstream to take other peoples' work and give the impression that bitmark is under development when in fact this shitcoin has stopped being developed since 2015 (if you don't count the 2016 commits on readme files and protocol version bumps) . Even his newest bitmark-app repository is just an empty electron instance One search can answer this. https://solid.mit.edu/"Meet Our Team" Melvin Carvalho is listed as contributor to Solid, along with Tim Berners-Lee. Conclusion, Bitmark developer is also working on an MIT Project with the man who invented the World Wide Web, and leveraging his own work in Bitmark Storage development. |
|
|
|
That thread is misleading. "Team" has made no contributions. Fair enough. Do you know why deposits/withdrawals have been disabled on Poloniex? Is that a global problem or specific to Polo? I believe it has been disabled for quite some time. Polo gave no reason. Maintenance issue they said. 4 coins disabled currently I think. |
|
|
|
That thread is misleading. "Team" has made no contributions. |
|
|
|
I have been out of Bitmark a long time now.
Who has taken over development?
And what is the status of development?
Could someone give an old BTM supporter a recap?
OK, but brief answer with some pointers. You could start your recap on page 118 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=660544.2340After that you can recap on slack, see the pinned messages. If you want to see more, github & gitbook. Melvin is lead dev & has done loads. |
|
|
|
Second that. Excellent images, plus I hear they'll be an Api allowing people to extend to make tailor image of their own (if I understand right). Also, I'll make this my "hello" post to this thread, although I should be know to some of you already from elsewhere. Marking is fantastic and inspiring work. This may well imo become an historic thread! |
|
|
|
|
It's probably not just about when you start mining, but what you mine.
|
|
|
|
|
Another great resource. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably the ultimate if only in written history for most people.
Paradigm shift, caught a lot of people out. Need to look forward, not back.
|
|
|
|
|
Good info here. Thanks to all, and sympathies.
|
|
|
|
Don't really think "stabilized" applies in the context of crypto currencies at this point in time. I see it as a new paradigm, and old terms from old finance mostly look like anachronisms. The number 800 itself is just arbitrary when it refers to a fiat currency, which by definition pretty much has no stable worth. I'm a new man here btw, hello  |
|
|
|
|
