 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
thank you very much! working on already!
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator, please inform Deividas that I've sent him an email. Waiting for his response. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
The Rockefeller family’s venture-capital arm is moving into cryptocurrencies. Venrock (“Venture” plus “Rockefellers”) is partnering with the cryptocurrency investor group, CoinFund, to help entrepreneurs launch blockchain-based businesses. Full article you can find HERE |
|
|
|
Just looking at Telegram, a corporation that has more than 200 million users, it is quite strange to see that it would go for a Telegram ICO. It probably has the resources already to jump start its own private blockchain projects without raising more funds from the public, yet it just jumped on the Telegram ICO band wagon and has raised $1.7 billion USD so far. That is more than what the biggest 5 ICOs of 2017 raised together. More about it you can find HERE |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is not king in India.  Ethereum topped bitcoin as the most searched-for cryptocurrency in India over the past five months, commanding a 34.4% share of currency searches overall versus bitcoin’s 29.9%. More about it you can read HERE. |
|
|
|
Already set an alarm haha.  Best of luck! |
|
|
|
|
wow! one of the nicest affiliates i have ever seen on icos! perfect way to gather vloggers, bloggers and etc to promote your ico! best of luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Will there be decentralised oracles or you will be doing all the outcomes?
|
|
|
|
But as said, stats are better than regular startups/fundraisers (59% vs 75%) of failed ICOs. Even with these stats, The ROI average is 1200%, which is quite nice.
But it still shows that a lot of these ICOs ar complete scams. Also it's not entirely fair to just compare the percentage of fail ICOs vs regular startups, and I think what is really important is to understand the reasons why those projects failed. It would be interesting to see how many of them failed because the project didn't mana to survive to it's competition, and how many didn't even had a project, and just failed because they were complete scams. I think i that study was done, it would most likely favour regular startups. Not saying ICOs are bad, but it's still easy to create completely fake projects in that space, compared to startups. ICOs are in very early ages and you can easily see it from so much failed/scam projects. We need some time to understand how everything works and learn how to find legit project. A lot of project even do not need ico or blockchain, but they are using it as a way to raise some funds. Thats not ok in my opinion. I trully believe that 2018 will be the way much more successful year for ICOs than 2017. Especially for investors  |
|
|
|
|
I believe that in 2020 we will be using blockchain and payments via in every sphere. Just we have to clearify a lot of things and adopt it to everyday usage. It will take some time, but 2 years of process, i think, sounds legit.
|
|
|
|
|
But as said, stats are better than regular startups/fundraisers (59% vs 75%) of failed ICOs. Even with these stats, The ROI average is 1200%, which is quite nice.
|
|
|
|
|
As I understand, now we are in the third phase of Elliot waves, which means small correction.
|
|
|
|
|
in my opinion, ICO is a perfect way to raise, crowdfund money for your blockchain-based project. There are a lot of ICOs which definately do not need blockchain to work perfectly, but launching ICOs as a way to raise some funds for projects. thats the biggest problem i think.
|
|
|
|
|
