 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Hi all,
Good to say that all bounty submits have been checked and verified again.
Greetz
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Tomorrow June 14 we will update all bounty claimn again. Please submit your claims of the last period.
Kind regards!
|
|
|
|
|
On may 23 we will confirm all bounty claims again. Please submit your claims of the last period before that date. Thanks you all!
|
|
|
|
We start week 1 the day we registered? How how does it work? We should submit the report one time or everyday for social media campaign?
Hi, you can start when you want. Sign up at dividertoken.com for bounty campaigns. We have a bounty system running on the website. All proof must be submitted in the portal. Kind regards |
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Soon we will publish an interactive passive income calculator on our website. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi bountyhunters,
Tomorrow all bounty claim will be updates again. Many thanks for your work! Keep it up.
|
|
|
|
my stakes/tasks in the website have not been confirmed since 26 March 2019. Is the bounty campaign still ongoing?
Hi, yes the bountyprogram is running strong! We are a bit behind with confirming because of the many claims. Sorry about that. Should be solved before the weekend! |
|
|
|
To participate please sign up at dividertoken.com/login. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Can you please elaborate why you call this a scam? Plagiarized whitepaper? Based on a line of SEC ruling? Or some similarities about common description of masternode? Your entire whitepaper, save for the last 2 pages, is plagiarized. It is not "similar", as you put it, but exact, word-for-word copies, lifted from various places with no references or accreditation whatsoever. Would you not have rather that the people that represent the company also to their own work? Absolutely. But you didn't do your own work. You stole from others. Stealing work from others is dishonest and immoral. Using someone else's work as a means to attract "investors" to your project is borderline fraud. Plagiarism will get you banned from this forum, will get you kicked out of universities, will get you fired from jobs, could even get you sued. At the very least, it is untrustworthy behaviour. We never intend to scam or fraud anything or anyone. We stand by our idea and worked/working hard for it. I find making the statement that everything exept for 2 pages is plagiarized and therefore mark the whole project as a scam a bit bold and disrespect to a hard working team. We will rewrite those few sections in our own words and publish a new draft. Are you willing to recheck the new draft?(not asking to removed your post, just for help) |
|
|
|
Please
Can you please elaborate why you call this a scam? Plagiarized whitepaper?
You gave the correct answer yourself. Yes, it's because of Plagiarized Whitepaper.
The description about the concept itself is unique and not plagiarized. Thats whats important about a project, not some basic ICO rules.
But an ICO which cannot hire a professional Whitepaper writer and also cannot generate there own unique content is rather a scam or should be a scam in the future as they are just ignoring the basic rules of ICOs and would surely not be able to handle the people's investment or grow it in anyway. I understand what you mean. But does it also mean that a company in startup always must hire people to do there stuff? Would you not have rather that the people that represent the company also to their own work? We rather spend our money on developing the platform and server infrastructure for the project. Why call a whole project a scam based on the whitepaper, when all the text about the project itself is unique and written by the people that produced the idea and stand by it, but have some lines in it about basic SEC rules no one cares about and that can be find every where on the internet( we did not even get it from the docs that where provided as "evidence")? Are those the important whitepaper lines to call the whole thing a scam? When I was talking about the basic ICO rules did not mean I was talking about rules of a ICO itself. We are fully aware of those and nothing is ignored. I was talking about the lines in the whitepaper regarding SEC ICO rules. |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Can you please elaborate why you call this a scam? Plagiarized whitepaper? Based on a line of SEC ruling? Or some similarities about common description of masternode? And you refer to the icotop whitepaper? Thats not unique either.
The description about the concept itself is unique and not plagiarized. Thats whats important about a project, not some basic ICO rules.
|
|
|
|
Hi administrator. I registered on the platform (twitter, facebook campaign). Send in confirmation only tweets / posts?
or retweet / repost also send?
Hi, both should be register in the platform. Thank you |
|
|
|
|
Hi tanks for the reply. All participation for bountyprogram must be on our bountyplatform. Please sign up on dividertoken.com
|
|
|
|
Hello, I am representative of icoholder.com company. You have been selected and added to icoholder.com. Find your project on our website and go through verification to add more information. https://icoholder.com/en/divider-28966Please no advertising and keep on topic. |
|
|
|
Strange procedure for login. Why do admin needs to approval our emails ? {+}
Hi, the procedure is not for email approval. The check is for the accounts. We check all social accounts for authenticity and if they meet the requierments. |
|
|
|
|
We have updated the topic with signatures code for the BTCtalk campaign.
|
|
|
|
what day do need to report ?
Reporting can be done whenever you like on the platform. We advice to do it daily so we can check everything faster. |
|
|
|
Hi, could not tell. As I understand all the bounty program will run on your platform, in this thread reports are not what you don’t need to pass.
Hi, Yes all bounty claims will run in the platform. In this thread no reports necessary. |
|
|
|
|
