Here is Jason's speech at a conference in London.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDIhEiqCqyQ

Oh yes, now where you have said it it is obvious  
Thanks!

I guess you have no solved old data block or know where I can get one? Maybe for testnet?

Mh thanks but I don't get that but I think it is not so important
Though I have one last question. When I want to calculate a block am I on the right way with that?
- I take the data string from getwork (without line breakes)
- I try many values at the place in the string where the nonce is (should be from char at position 153 to 161)
- After each nonce value I SHA256 the whole string
- Now I test if there is the right count of leading zeros!?

I dont understand the last step. Afaik I have to check if the hash is smaller than the current target. But how can I do this?
For example the hash from previous post:
000000000000169df290bd7628e59dae18405aba2f660b4ff832f93dc9a10fb0

How can I check if it is valid? (I dont mean the check bitcoin does like if the merkle tree or the timestamp is right. I mean just the check if it hast the right difficulty)

Hey,
I took data with getwork while block 129593 was the newest on blockexplorer.com and also with bitcoind getinfo it said "block" : 129593.
But now I have a Problem. This is what "bitcoind getwork" gave me (already formated):
So the previous hash (if I reverse it) is:
000000004e600000273de2fa70e4aaff5da70123bd19cecb3c0c7b0f24da7ab9

But bitexplorer said that previous hash is:
000000000000169df290bd7628e59dae18405aba2f660b4ff832f93dc9a10fb0

The first hash also hasn't enough zeros I guess!? What's wrong there?

What can I do to convert the data from blockexplorer to a valid data string for getwork? I would like to test to send a valid block (after it is solved) and see no other way to do it than taking the data from blockexplorer...

the hence is 32 bit so it is 1 to 4294967296. I guess it's to slow to check all these out but on the other hand it's the same chance to find a block with your method than mit the random one I guess. Someone maybe knows how it is done in practice?

But where do you but the nonce? Here is an example answer of getwork:

I guess it's smarter to put a random value in nonce and not starting from 1 to X isn't it?

Ah ok, but how do I know which part in that big hexadecimal string is the nonce?
Isn't there somewhere a more specific documentation about all that?
Or where did you learn all this? I did a lot of googling but couldn't find out

If I pass the data back to the server in hexadecimal is there a way to test or get an answer if that was right? Did the server answert with something like "ok" or "bad data"?

Thanks!

jealous?
[Edit]
Or I guess you mean it like that then I have to say "indeed!"

Thank you again, you're great help
I found out how to "get work" and I also found the format description on that site: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Original_Bitcoin_client/API_calls_list
What I understand ist "target" but I have no idea what I have to do with midstate, data and hash1?
Where is the body with the transactions? How can I calculate the block without that?
Maybe bitcoin don't give me this data but only what I need for calculation? But when I calculate a while how did bitcoin now with which data I made my calculation when I send it back?
And thats my next question. I can send data back with "getwork [data]" but in which format?
Sorry if that's explained somewhere in the wiki but I haven't found something (nor on google).

Thank you so far, that helps
A few questions are left...

getwork is new for me! I googled it and wonder if you mean m0mchils patch? I patch the bitcoin client (or server?) with it and so I'm able to get block data and return it to the network if I find a block? That would be easier than I thought but not really a own miner implementation I guess?

If I understand you right I could take only one of the new transactions and double SHA256 it with the concatenation of itself? Like SHA256(SHA256(hash + hash))?
So what I have then is a really small merkle root isn't it? I could use it for a valid block but I guess that isn't really good for the quality of the network!?
Is there nothing to ensure that as many transactions as possible will be putted in a new block?

Only the longest chain is valid right? So there is a tie of two chains cause of two valid blocks and the next block for one of it decided that this on is the valid chain. But now there could be also been found a new
block for the other chain and after that one again one more new block. So now the other chain is longer than the first one! Is this one now the new valid?? My englisch is too bad I hope you understand

Thanks!

Hey,
I've read a lot but there still are questions for writing my own (test-)miner
I guess I know how to get all data for calculation a block except for how to 'calculate' the merkle root.
I far as I understand I first have to get all recent transactions. Let's say these are only four with the hashes 1, 2, 3 and 4 (I know that this aren't real hashes).
Now I take these and hash them like this:
Is that right? And how exately do I hash them? Is it
where + is writing it just one after the other?

Do I have to write just the masterhash in the block or all transactions? (On blockexplorer.com there are all transactions but I don't know...)
And how do I know what are new transactions and what are old? I guess I look in the old block but what is the newest transaction in the old block?

If I now have the (for example) four newest block and the right merkle root what happens if a new transaction is made while I calculate the block? Is the block still valid?

It woul be so nice if someone could explain me that. Thank you!

Oh and one other question.. what happens if two users calculate a valid block at the exact same time? I guess both blocks could be share through the network and at the and one half has the one and the other half the other block. Which one is the valid then!? Thanks!