Latest posts of: PeFro

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: February 23, 2014, 10:09:32 PM

there's a great google tech talk on youtube about safemaid... couple of years old but the concepts are well explained: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLA77zxk-vA

on: January 29, 2014, 11:36:59 PM

I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 8ad094d8-c9ab-46c1-be8d-83bf0fa0f2d8

on: December 14, 2013, 06:41:10 PM

Hi, I intended to update the documentation for Electrum which is apparently hosted on the Bitcoin Wiki. Currently there is an obligatory bitcoin payment in order to get editing privileges. Not sure when it was set but currently this amounts to 8$ which seems a little high if the goal is not to discourage volunteers. Any chance this could be adjusted to something more reasonable (and maybe pegging it to the usd/btc exchange rate for the future)?

on: December 14, 2013, 06:16:14 PM

I´ve been trying to do exactly what OP is refering to. I´ve started Electrum with the -o option and successfully restored from a previously created seed. When I try to sign an unsigned transaction created on my online computer, I get an Exception "Adress not found" showing the public key adress which is the input for that transaction. That public key adress isn´t showing up on the offline computer but I would assume that it could be derived from one of the private keys!? What am I missing? edit: nevermind, found it: executing "wallet.accounts[0].create_new_address(0)" in the console did the trick... described here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344115.0

on: November 23, 2013, 12:09:09 PM

I´d like to be able to simply save the pdf backup on my sdcard in order to manually transfer it to my pc. Is that going to be an option?

on: November 08, 2013, 02:08:12 AM

please refund for order #438 to the given payout adress, thx

on: November 04, 2013, 11:12:41 PM

Quote from: waxwing on November 04, 2013, 10:50:43 PM Paysty is only verifying that what you enter into the 'accno' and 'sum' boxes actually appears somewhere in the html of the page. So of course you're right you could enter anything that appears somewhere on the page, not necessarily the true account number for example. This is just a first stage verification - the real point is as follows: if there's a dispute between buyer and seller, the escrow can (if you choose to give it) take the ssl key(s) specifically associated with that html page, and decrypt that one page and read it. The protection of your privacy is based on doing a kind of "reset" of the ssl connection and then reloading the page. This means the escrow will never be able to see anything except that one page. Does it make sense? Obviously a more detailed explanation will be given in the future. Yeah thanks, makes sense. I guess in the end there will always be some kind of trust required, even for technical people, unless they are willing and able to inspect the whole source code but in essence that´s equally applicable to using bitcoin itself. Making explicit what kind of information at which step is stored where and visible to whom and at which point in time is going to be crucial though.

on: November 04, 2013, 09:05:34 PM

I just tested it for 2 banks. For netbank.de it works just fine. For sparkasse.de it doesn´t... this is the last part of the log: Code: 7N m1inihttp received /page_marked?accno=397686700&sum=%E2%88%9229,44&time=1383598717 request2 .A0ttempt no:1 to find HTML in our trace. 0.1:28182 OUT 127.0.0.1:52180 Amount not found in HTML Attempt no:2 to find HTML in our trace Amount not found in HTML sending failure. Reason: Data not found in HTML the amount I entered was 29,44, so.. not sure why it´s garbled in the log while the account no is fine Edit: Ok, my fault (kinda)... I didn´t enter 29,44 but -29,44, as that was the way it was stated. Imho this should be processed either way. So, entering 29,44 works for sparkasse.de, too. Now maybe a stupid question... what exactly does this prove? Is it a problem that, e.g. I can send a transaction to one of my own bank accounts and put the actual target account number (whom I´m supposed to pay) just in the comments field of the transaction? Paysty does find the actual target account number in the html but does it recognize that this is not the account number money is send to?

on: November 04, 2013, 10:48:19 AM

bought 1 share ~10 hours ago, but haven´t received a confirmation mail yet order #438 https://blockchain.info/tx/6b6159905e32dc0d95ac6676eb2aa82d7b1f02b8de501919a943777fbe2414fb Quote Round 14A: Düsseldorf, Berlin, Germany (SOLD OUT in 6 hours, a GB Forum record by ~100%) I like both of those options, I´m actually close to Düsseldorf and could check it out personally. But to be honest, I think Berlin is even better a location, lots of tourists/international traffic... maybe in Kreuzberg?

on: November 04, 2013, 12:17:54 AM

Hi, I´m a long time lurker since 2011+ and would like to get out of Newbie Hell in order to finally participate. Thanks!

Pages: [1]