Show Posts
Hi,
Could you me explain why your team wasn't yet fully verified on Icoholder : https://icoholder.com/en/miner-one-17959 ?
And on Trackico why your MIO ico isn't yet too : https://www.trackico.io/ico/miner-one/#tab-rating when IRM is Already?
If you want to have more member ( of which I am a part), you must be irreproachable everywhere...
Finally, on Icobench Andrius Miron has failed the ICO KYC Report on https://icobench.com/ico/miner-one/ratings#ratings. Why ?
Could you me explain why your team wasn't yet fully verified on Icoholder : https://icoholder.com/en/miner-one-17959 ?
And on Trackico why your MIO ico isn't yet too : https://www.trackico.io/ico/miner-one/#tab-rating when IRM is Already?
If you want to have more member ( of which I am a part), you must be irreproachable everywhere...
Finally, on Icobench Andrius Miron has failed the ICO KYC Report on https://icobench.com/ico/miner-one/ratings#ratings. Why ?
Not sure why Andrius's KYC didn't go through. He is resubmitting. KYC can be a fickle process, as anyone who has tried it knows. Let's see what happens.
Well, I made the choice to invest in MIO project because of its GREEN vision of mining. I will be interested in promoting this project more to my contacts, but you are not answering the questions correctly. The first two questions were not answered (Icoholder and TrackIco).
