Some of the reasons I appreciate GamerToken is that they've 1) got demos out 2) are building on top of an existing and expanding non-fungible ecosystem (Ethereum) while also 3) handling the scalability issues via sidechains (with Plasma relays on the roadmap).

y tho

honestly, I'm disappointed in whomever is behind this

1. NFTs do not have fragmentation issues.
The community came to consensus on ERC721 quickly explicitly to prevent this fragmentation and we did a great job.
The only NFTs that realistically matter that were made before ERC721 was ratified are CryptoKitties (which will upgrade) and CryptoPunks (which will probably not upgrade).

So your entire premise is flawed.

2. The token is medium of exchange. It is 2018. This is embarrassing.

3. You don't need to ICO your javascript/python library that just delegates all the hard work to web3.

Take a hard look at what you're working on, please, and reconsider 1) the necessity of a token and 2) just release your libraries as open source. If you're really trying to push the ecosystem forward, you won't try and hold it back with this garbage.

hahhahaha

you're right, Ethereum _does_ make it easy to create a token and crowdsale contact. it's called copy and paste. it's so stupidly simple that the fact that you failing to develop it is all I need to know about the project and its chances of success. It shows me that YOU are not "acquainted with the Ethereum platform principles"

I repeat, do not give these fools any money.

I'm ethically required to tell all of you to stay very far away from anything related to this project.
The primary developer on this project is struggling to develop the token and crowdsale contracts to support the ICO, which is honestly just ridiculous.

(for those unaware, developing a token contract and crowdsale contract are the easiest possible thing to do in Ethereum right now (it's literally copy-paste), and the fact that they're struggling is _not_ a good sign for this project to really any project they're associated with).