 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
ETA is 10-15 Days (because i'm doing a lot of test and i've made a lot of changes)
Liqui will be FREE.
Great I am looking forward to it and I might add Liqui when it is available |
|
|
|
Well i first released 20 Beta Version and 46 Official version.
Every CAT Version have some add-ons : parameters, log, improvements. So, early CAT version could seems easier at GUI level, but every CAT version is more power than the previous one :-)
I think CAT is clean, but of course i need to put parameters/log/table somewhere : have 3 parameters 1 log and 5 table is different than have 60 parameters, 3 logs and 10 table.
About JavaFX well i'm not sure about the improvements i could get. At Swing level there'a lot of support and code example....
Well that is true for sure. Do you have an ETA for official 4.7 and how much liqui is gonna cost? |
|
|
|
So you reusing old interface as new interface?  I kinda like that, it looks nicer and cleaner than the current one on 4.6. It seems like you still using Swing, have you consider porting to JavaFX? No it's only an old screenshot  It looks cleaner and nicer because there were only some parameters and basic functions. Less info, less configuration for the user. When you start adding parameters you need to reorganize GUI. About JavaFX, i consider it in 2013, but i haven't found any reason to use it. Swing is ok for what i need I never saw the old version, can't believe it just so simple back in the day I thought you reorganize everything to make it looks cleaner. As a Java developer myself I can definitely see the appeal of using Swing but JavaFX would definitely give the CAT more professional looking, in my opinion. It just a thought anyway. |
|
|
|
So you reusing old interface as new interface? I kinda like that, it looks nicer and cleaner than the current one on 4.6. It seems like you still using Swing, have you consider porting to JavaFX? |
|
|
|
Ok the wallet is really unstable here. Apparently I am stupid enough to not notice it until a month later. I transferred a total of 256K SC separately to my wallet because I become really paranoid when it comes to transferring fund. The wallet then decided to deduct the highest amount from my wallet for no reason at all. (see pic)  Now my wallet only has 131K left. Fine, it is more than a month ago, who knows what might happened, I will let it go. But then another problem. Not sure if it a bug or the dev is aware of it. Apparently the addresses don't sync with the wallet. Here is a heck long story please bear with me. I decided to try to host the storage just for the fun of it. I have spare VPS laying around so I thought maybe to host it there so I don't have to have my computer on all the time. Since it needs initial fund to start the host so I decided to reuse the same wallet instead of create another one on the VPS. Ultimately the VPS becomes my primary use of SC. I created multiple addresses there to transfer fund in and out including the fund I mined with 10 GPUs for about a month. Fast forward to this month. I decided again to move the SC back to my main machine for no apparent reason. After getting Sia back on my main machine I found out that the wallet file I backup prior the VPS doesn't sync with the latest transaction and history I had on the VPS even though they are the same wallet. I still got some of my fund left, but those are the funds before the VPS and the wallet addresses are way less than I had. I had almost 2 pages of addresses on my VPS but this only got a little bit less than 1 page. Of course, I am actually stupid enough to cancel the VPS before trying things out first. So, now, there is no way for me to recover the wallet file on the VPS since it is practically deleted and I have more than 400K SC on it. Btw, that is also when I notice the deduction from the polo transaction. Of course, I won't bring it here without testing it. I have another earlier version of the wallet file laying around. I tested that and proved my point. Exact same wallet but less than 100K SC on it with much less wallet addresses attach to it, just half a page. So, I am looking at the same wallet file with 3 different versions, 1 with less than 100K SC, 1 with 131K SC, and another one with more than 400K SC that I lost. I really appreciate if anyone could help here but I don't really looking forward for it. Maybe this would teach someone a lesson here  Please note that I am not dumb, I didn't replace anything with anything. I have only 1 wallet file all along so there is no way I could have replaced that. Besides, I got it encrypted and stored it in my cold storage. I figure this is more or less my mistake for not making sure things so I am not blaming anyone but myself (except for the first part where the 126422.1724 SC got deducted for no reason) At least the Dev is honest about "there were many significant bugs" (that people are noticing)... So they have spent the last month building a proper testing framework to wring out bugs... And the next release looks to be early October based on this timeline. Yeah, the dev is definitely doing their work. I haven't lose hope on Sia though, just put some of my miners back into mining SC and this time I will leave some SC on exchange and some on the mining pool. Just so that I don't lose as much if something happen. |
|
|
|
Ok the wallet is really unstable here. Apparently I am stupid enough to not notice it until a month later. I transferred a total of 256K SC separately to my wallet because I become really paranoid when it comes to transferring fund. The wallet then decided to deduct the highest amount from my wallet for no reason at all. (see pic) Now my wallet only has 131K left. Fine, it is more than a month ago, who knows what might happened, I will let it go. But then another problem. Not sure if it a bug or the dev is aware of it. Apparently the addresses don't sync with the wallet. Here is a heck long story please bear with me. I decided to try to host the storage just for the fun of it. I have spare VPS laying around so I thought maybe to host it there so I don't have to have my computer on all the time. Since it needs initial fund to start the host so I decided to reuse the same wallet instead of create another one on the VPS. Ultimately the VPS becomes my primary use of SC. I created multiple addresses there to transfer fund in and out including the fund I mined with 10 GPUs for about a month. Fast forward to this month. I decided again to move the SC back to my main machine for no apparent reason. After getting Sia back on my main machine I found out that the wallet file I backup prior the VPS doesn't sync with the latest transaction and history I had on the VPS even though they are the same wallet. I still got some of my fund left, but those are the funds before the VPS and the wallet addresses are way less than I had. I had almost 2 pages of addresses on my VPS but this only got a little bit less than 1 page. Of course, I am actually stupid enough to cancel the VPS before trying things out first. So, now, there is no way for me to recover the wallet file on the VPS since it is practically deleted and I have more than 400K SC on it. Btw, that is also when I notice the deduction from the polo transaction. Of course, I won't bring it here without testing it. I have another earlier version of the wallet file laying around. I tested that and proved my point. Exact same wallet but less than 100K SC on it with much less wallet addresses attach to it, just half a page. So, I am looking at the same wallet file with 3 different versions, 1 with less than 100K SC, 1 with 131K SC, and another one with more than 400K SC that I lost. I really appreciate if anyone could help here but I don't really looking forward for it. Maybe this would teach someone a lesson here Please note that I am not dumb, I didn't replace anything with anything. I have only 1 wallet file all along so there is no way I could have replaced that. Besides, I got it encrypted and stored it in my cold storage. I figure this is more or less my mistake for not making sure things so I am not blaming anyone but myself (except for the first part where the 126422.1724 SC got deducted for no reason) |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone has any idea which power supply to power maybe at least 3 or 5 of them?
What is the power consumption for 1 unit on L mode?
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody care to donate a little here?
Much appreciated!
1879501464458190960
Please try to send a message as well. I want to test it out here.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Sent 550 NXT from 1879501464458190960. TX ID: 3986786450608452686Count me in!  |
|
|
|
Not sure who you are asking, but I was using a bridged WiFi connection on a laptop and the network got too congested, or it basically started acting shitty... Anyways, I got a TPLink powerline kit for like $40, router to wall on one end, wall to switch on the other; works awesome, cheap, steady, good speed, and I don't need to mess with any long wires.
I thought of getting one of these to ease the job as well but arent they suppose to run on the same circuit? I'm in an apartment, it's a 1br but I've got about 10 breaker switches in my utility closet. I've got these things on separate breakers on opposite sides of the main room and it still works. It's a gamble worth taking, just buy from a seller that will allow return, easy enough to explain if it doesn't work with your wiring. I thought the same thing but decided to give it a shot, glad I did, thing works like magic! Aight definitely will give it a shot. Really hate to pull wire all around the place.  |
|
|
|
Not sure who you are asking, but I was using a bridged WiFi connection on a laptop and the network got too congested, or it basically started acting shitty... Anyways, I got a TPLink powerline kit for like $40, router to wall on one end, wall to switch on the other; works awesome, cheap, steady, good speed, and I don't need to mess with any long wires.
I thought of getting one of these to ease the job as well but arent they suppose to run on the same circuit? |
|
|
|
DOGECOIN!!!! so currency... DTAHLHtVWgHot79fLdYrkCov8awtyJ6pMT Thank you! |
|
|
|
Great... another case here.  It seems to be happened to Gigabyte card more often than other. I guess I will just sell off mine ASAP. Worried about it a month ago when found out a lot of similar cases. Now I am just worrying it more. It does not worth the whole damn house being burned to crisp just for a damn faulty card. lol... |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me if these need to be plugged in to a computer to mine. If i can use the computer to set it up and leave it mining by itself that would be great
I would suggest you run the proxy on a raspberry pi instead. Runs great 24/7. This way you dont have to keep your PC up all the time. I tried Minepeon with a Raspberry and my rejected share rate was significantly higher. I think if you use bfgminer and Raspian it might work better(?). I dunno, for me there were problems using anything other than Slush's proxy, something to do with long poll support and the cubes, even bfgminer as proxy on PC wasn't allowing long poll support. Fwiw, you might want to check the rejected shares in the cube webUI. I run it with bfgminer as proxy on raspbian. It turns out to be run fine for me. The rejected shares stay around 0.03% all the time. Were you able to get static IP working on Raspian without using wifi? On MinePeon it's all messed up, I can only get static IP to work with a mini wifi adapter. I have a second Rpi kicking around and want to use it, but I don't want to buy another WiFi adapter, considering Raspian with BFGminer if the static ip setup works. Also, is it stable 24/7? I am not sure on this. My router automatically assign ip to devices statically. I have tried different OS, reformat, reboot on the same device but I got back the same ip regardless. You should tried it out first. I previously run 20x USB Block Erupter 24/7 on 2 rpi for 5 months without any problem. I also have another rpi running 5 Red Fury and another for a Cube. So far has been running for weeks without problem. Nice, I decided to stop being a cheap ass and ponied up the $10 for another wifi thingy, gives me more freedom and frees up a port on my switch. So tempted to buy another damn cube lol... Yeah, I am tempted to buy another as well but too bad I am short of a few more satoshi. I have no other choice of exchange but Coinbase and I have to wait a week for 0.05 BTC. lol... Also, you can't believe that I actually have to rework the whole damn house electricity wiring and network for this 1 damn cube. Definitely need another router and a higher amp fuse.  |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me if these need to be plugged in to a computer to mine. If i can use the computer to set it up and leave it mining by itself that would be great
I would suggest you run the proxy on a raspberry pi instead. Runs great 24/7. This way you dont have to keep your PC up all the time. I tried Minepeon with a Raspberry and my rejected share rate was significantly higher. I think if you use bfgminer and Raspian it might work better(?). I dunno, for me there were problems using anything other than Slush's proxy, something to do with long poll support and the cubes, even bfgminer as proxy on PC wasn't allowing long poll support. Fwiw, you might want to check the rejected shares in the cube webUI. I run it with bfgminer as proxy on raspbian. It turns out to be run fine for me. The rejected shares stay around 0.03% all the time. Were you able to get static IP working on Raspian without using wifi? On MinePeon it's all messed up, I can only get static IP to work with a mini wifi adapter. I have a second Rpi kicking around and want to use it, but I don't want to buy another WiFi adapter, considering Raspian with BFGminer if the static ip setup works. Also, is it stable 24/7? I am not sure on this. My router automatically assign ip to devices statically. I have tried different OS, reformat, reboot on the same device but I got back the same ip regardless. You should tried it out first. I previously run 20x USB Block Erupter 24/7 on 2 rpi for 5 months without any problem. I also have another rpi running 5 Red Fury and another for a Cube. So far has been running for weeks without problem. |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me if these need to be plugged in to a computer to mine. If i can use the computer to set it up and leave it mining by itself that would be great
I would suggest you run the proxy on a raspberry pi instead. Runs great 24/7. This way you dont have to keep your PC up all the time. I tried Minepeon with a Raspberry and my rejected share rate was significantly higher. I think if you use bfgminer and Raspian it might work better(?). I dunno, for me there were problems using anything other than Slush's proxy, something to do with long poll support and the cubes, even bfgminer as proxy on PC wasn't allowing long poll support. Fwiw, you might want to check the rejected shares in the cube webUI. I run it with bfgminer as proxy on raspbian. It turns out to be run fine for me. The rejected shares stay around 0.03% all the time. |
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me if these need to be plugged in to a computer to mine. If i can use the computer to set it up and leave it mining by itself that would be great
I would suggest you run the proxy on a raspberry pi instead. Runs great 24/7. This way you dont have to keep your PC up all the time. |
|
|
|
Yay! Much coin! DTAHLHtVWgHot79fLdYrkCov8awtyJ6pMT |
|
|
|
Love dogecoin because of its community and I love dogs personally. Love it because of its uniqueness too. Much coin!  DTAHLHtVWgHot79fLdYrkCov8awtyJ6pMT |
|
|
|
I got my Red Fury yesterday. I actually have quite a few problems with them. One of them has a component fell off (picture). As I am not into electrical thingy, I do not know what it is. I hope anybody can tell me what it is and does it have any effect on the miner itself? So far, I am able to hash it just fine but I doubt it is going to last me long. Also, 4 out of 5 of them have very high HW about 30% while the other one has only about 3%. I wonder is it normal for Red Fury to have such high HW or I am missing anything here? I am running Bfgminer 3.9.0 off a raspberry pi with raspbian wheezy. Any help will be kindly appreciated. Please do let me know if I miss out anything. Thank you in advanced.  |
|
|
|
|
