 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Help needed.
After converting to new wallet, was able to make a stake and after that the wallet stuck at block 58067 and no matter what I do it doesn't unfreeze.
Moved the wallet to 3 different PC, the wallet doesn't want to start downloading blocks.
Which is more weird, when on a PC with stuck wallet, I generate new wallet it goes beyound the block height of the stuck wallet.
Waiting it since 29-th december, so I don't suspect it will eventually fix and wallet is falling behind.
Any ideas?
Still stuck at block 58067, no matter what I do it still doesn't want to update. When I try to transfer the coins it gives me "bad-txns-inputs-missing" Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
Help needed.
After converting to new wallet, was able to make a stake and after that the wallet stuck at block 58067 and no matter what I do it doesn't unfreeze.
Moved the wallet to 3 different PC, the wallet doesn't want to start downloading blocks.
Which is more weird, when on a PC with stuck wallet, I generate new wallet it goes beyound the block height of the stuck wallet.
Waiting it since 29-th december, so I don't suspect it will eventually fix and wallet is falling behind.
Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
Problem with multi GPU systems - 8 x R7 265, Ubuntu 14.04, Catalyst 15.12 Connecting to eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
Stratum server sent us the first job
Mining on 8 devices
Solver 0.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 1.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 2.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 0.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 1.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 4.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 4.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 7.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 5.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 5.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 2.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 3.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 7.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 3.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 6.1: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
Solver 6.0: unexpected banner "Maximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedMaximum number of clients reachedSILENTARMY mining mode ready"
|
|
|
|
Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so? Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get: user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127
apt-get install build-essential Got through this and still looking for OpenCL during build.
edit: Installing Intel OpenCL did do the trick, I've manage to build sa-solver. But now I do see the only one processor and there are 2 on this server.
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:20: recipe for target 'sa-solver' failed
make: *** [sa-solver] Error 1
|
|
|
|
Is Silentarmy able to work as standalone CPU miner? Or is there any other walkthrough for doing so? Ubuntu 16.04 server, I get: user@ubuntu:~/silentarmy$ make
echo 'const char *ocl_code = R"_mrb_(' >_kernel.h
cpp input.cl >>_kernel.h
/bin/sh: 1: cpp: not found
Makefile:25: recipe for target '_kernel.h' failed
make: *** [_kernel.h] Error 127
|
|
|
|
|
I have a few rigs with 8 x R7 265. Starts mining successfully, but in mining screen I see devX up to 6, meaning giving display of hashrate up to the 6-th card. Possible to make it 8 at least?
|
|
|
|
Why only one is interested in higher hashrates with Claymore's miner? And personally the author hasn't interested in this case?
The miner is realy sends more shares to pool, even for both coin - ETH & SIA, and pools accepted it. There were no HW errors. Clocks are the same.
R9 270 - 15-16 MH/s
7950/7970 about 22 MH/s
Of course everybody is interested. But I'll indulge you and ask "How"? |
|
|
|
Since last epoch #83 and a new DAG file, I'm unable to mine with my rigs with 2GB cards.
They all are with 8 cards (270, 270x, 265, etc.) and all stopped mining last night and unable to bring them online since then.
Rigs are with Ubunty LTS 14.04 x64
Variables are checked and reched, driver version is 15.302, SDK is 2.9.1 (tried different, none of them work for that matter). Miner is 5.3 to some of them, updated a few to 7.2, but still getting the dreaded "OpenCL error -4 (0) - cannot create DAG on GPU"
Rigs are with Asrock H61 Del, H81 Pro BTC some with 8GB of RAM, some with 4GB and the common is that none of them work after last night.
Tested with stock ethminer, DAG file is 1696MB and cards are currently mining, so to my observations problem is not with GPU RAM.
Any suggestions?
Try other ethash aalgo please f.e Expanse Expanse is working as expected, problem is with DAG size. |
|
|
|
Since last epoch #83 and a new DAG file, I'm unable to mine with my rigs with 2GB cards.
They all are with 8 cards (270, 270x, 265, etc.) and all stopped mining last night and unable to bring them online since then.
Rigs are with Ubunty LTS 14.04 x64
Variables are checked and reched, driver version is 15.302, SDK is 2.9.1 (tried different, none of them work for that matter). Miner is 5.3 to some of them, updated a few to 7.2, but still getting the dreaded "OpenCL error -4 (0) - cannot create DAG on GPU"
Rigs are with Asrock H61 Del, H81 Pro BTC some with 8GB of RAM, some with 4GB and the common is that none of them work after last night.
Tested with stock ethminer, DAG file is 1696MB and cards are currently mining, so to my observations problem is not with GPU RAM.
Any suggestions?
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 For some reason if I only have a bunch of 2GB cards in a rig without any larger cards like 3GB-4GB then mining doesn't start either. So if you have a rig like 2GB,2Gb,2GB,2GB,2GB Swap one of them with 3GB/4GB and try again 3GB,2GB,2GB,2GB,2GB,2GB What you suggest is a no go, have one rig with R9 290. The 290 did start mining but because the rig has other 2GB cards, the miner restarted in the end. What Claymore suggested did help. Obviously 2GB cards are going EOL in terms of Ethereum, although everybody said POS will come before 2GB become obsolete. Claymore, have you considered some sort of DAG file chunking in your miner, is it doable at all? When I started mining ethereum in the beginning of the year, I've read that somebody did made it for 5xxx/6xxx cards back then, although never looked in the question. |
|
|
|
|
Since last epoch #83 and a new DAG file, I'm unable to mine with my rigs with 2GB cards.
They all are with 8 cards (270, 270x, 265, etc.) and all stopped mining last night and unable to bring them online since then.
Rigs are with Ubunty LTS 14.04 x64
Variables are checked and reched, driver version is 15.302, SDK is 2.9.1 (tried different, none of them work for that matter). Miner is 5.3 to some of them, updated a few to 7.2, but still getting the dreaded "OpenCL error -4 (0) - cannot create DAG on GPU"
Rigs are with Asrock H61 Del, H81 Pro BTC some with 8GB of RAM, some with 4GB and the common is that none of them work after last night.
Tested with stock ethminer, DAG file is 1696MB and cards are currently mining, so to my observations problem is not with GPU RAM.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
Looking for SMS service, which accepts payment in btc. API and Sender ID (spoof) preferred, but not mandatory. Will be used for sending advertisements.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
Here is the full log, when I start the miner: ----------- ./miner -u 47NHu3QopHC7sBrqraNJwqD9xXAWErAsDiEr3QKQcX3rFyKfGa2CPJcXsG9qEiYHNDT2nf6BwZPFMW3rxtES1MPwN1bCMTm -p x -a 0
имммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммм╩
╨ Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v7.0 Beta ╨
хмммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммммм╪
Cards available: 6
GPU #0: name: Tahiti, 2861 MB available, 28 units
GPU #1: name: Tahiti, 2869 MB available, 28 units
GPU #2: name: Tahiti, 2869 MB available, 28 units
GPU #3: name: Tahiti, 2869 MB available, 28 units
GPU #4: name: Tahiti, 2869 MB available, 28 units
GPU #5: name: Tahiti, 2869 MB available, 28 units
Total cards: 6
Catalyst 13.12 is REQUIRED for best performance and compatibility
At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Initializing...
POOL version
Internal error: Input OpenCL binary is not for the target!
Internal error: Input OpenCL binary is not for the target!
GPU 0: -a 1 mode selected
GPU 1: -a 1 mode selected
GPU 2: -a 1 mode selected
GPU 3: -a 1 mode selected
GPU 4: -a 1 mode selected
GPU 5: -a 1 mode selected
4 pools specified.
Stratum - connecting to 'mine.moneropool.org' <104.131.59.214> port 80
Stratum - connecting to 'mine.moneropool.org' <104.131.59.214> port 80
Stratum - Connected
Stratum - Connected
Pool Diff 10000
DevFee: Pool Diff 10000
GPU 0, GpuMiner k1a failed -48
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
GPU 1, GpuMiner k1a failed -48
GPU 3, GpuMiner k1a failed -48
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
GPU 5, GpuMiner k1a failed -48
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
GPU 2, GpuMiner k1a failed -48
GPU 4, GpuMiner k1a failed -48
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
09/18/11-15:23:53 - New job received from mine.moneropool.org:80
Speed: 0 h/s, TotalHashes: 0K, DevHashes: 0K Mining time: 00:00
The other thing that is bugging me, that in the both archives uploaded, have identical sizes, and both give me the warning "Catalyst 13.12 is REQUIRED for best performance and compatibility", although the files in the archives are different. I use driver 14.4, set swap to 20GB, system memory is 2GB, 6 x 7950 cards. Operating system is Ubunty Server 14.04 LTS. Tried both versions, 13.12 and 14.6, both are giving me the error above. |
|
|
|
Tried the new linux miner, although I run into problem. System configuration is Ubuntu 14.04 Server LTS, 14.4 drivers.
When I first ran the 13.12 miner, it gave me:
--
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
--
Tried with 14.6 miner, same error. Increased swap to 20GB - same error on both version of the linux miner.
I remember, that in windows version, I was able to run 14.6 version with 14.4 (yes, it was not optimal performance, but at least it worked)
What am I doing wrong?
I used default OS config, I did not change any settings for swap etc. Check your RAM size, I use 4GB and it works for 3 290X cards. So actually 16GB swap file is not required for the Linux version at all? edit: when I try to run the miner it gives me GpuMiner k1a failed -48 error on all the cards, the machine is with 2GB ram, 800MB used, when miner starts, the usage goes to about 930MB. I suspect it is not a memory or swap size problem. What is the chance the problem to be with the 14.4 drivers I'm using? |
|
|
|
|
Tried the new linux miner, although I run into problem. System configuration is Ubuntu 14.04 Server LTS, 14.4 drivers.
When I first ran the 13.12 miner, it gave me:
--
GPU memory allocation failed. Try to set at least 16 GB of Virtual Memory: Computer Properties / Advanced System Settings / Performance / Advanced / Virtual Memory
--
Tried with 14.6 miner, same error. Increased swap to 20GB - same error on both version of the linux miner.
I remember, that in windows version, I was able to run 14.6 version with 14.4 (yes, it was not optimal performance, but at least it worked)
What am I doing wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
I have ~40 pieces of Tehnobit HEX16A2. I'm willing to sell, but this depends on the offer prices.
My location is Ruse, Bulgaria, EU.
Please contact me on PM for offers.
Escrow is possible, but if you pay the taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking to buy Avalon Gen1 chips.
The demand could be from a few hundred to a few thousand chips, depending on the price.
For offers, please send me PM with your location, quantity and price.
|
|
|
|
Hi strombom ! i'm interested by your hardware ! Could you MP me about that ? Do you still have hardware in stock ? Which model of chip do you need ? I have some avalon chip here !
Thanks a lot for your answer !!
I have 11 complete units purchased from strombom - control units, backplane, power distributor, hashing boards, all needed cables. No casings, radiators, fans and PSU. If you have interest, please contact me on PM. So far this units can host Gen1 chips - marking A3256-Q48 |
|
|
|
35 days passed, when this is going to happen? Ok you'll get it in 25 days. Consider your fee in this group as a gift Regards: Martin [/quote] |
|
|
|
Steve, I've wrote you one too many times for this. When we voted, you counted my vote for all the chips, but you told me you would fix this later. And you didn't. Now mueslo has been refunded for the chips I've purchased from him. I'll contact mueslo, but this was your job to correct. I expect to take responsibility for this mess. 1GazwWUUdMVzVHjaCqWS5T69nuKmeUz6rf
To t13hydra: As soon as this[1] address receives a transfer of 14.08 BTC from hacko.bg[2]
with at least 6 confirmations, my 128 shares from Batch #1 belonging to me, mueslo[1] are
to be transferred to hacko.bg[2]
[1]: 1GazwWUUdMVzVHjaCqWS5T69nuKmeUz6rf
[2]: 1L1yVgod8mAhBqQNY1t6mjz9F1RyufDiMd
Hwf4i4XRze+88rCxO9sLY5hOvMvVQ15u1S+1K0ZwDkzPujG3Kw41GZWOP6twjxtO6HTm+EQGkfZKxOnfgXcYdSg=
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
what about who bougth the boards and asked for a refund on chips?
Could those be used for gen2 avalon chips?
Is there someone in that condition (boards and no chips)?
best regards,
ilpirata79
This is what Avalon has promised. But it is totally different subject on how they keep their promises. The good thing is that it will be much easier for the chips ti be designed to fit in the gen1 motherboards, as they have boards themselves - the reference design avalon unit. So if they produce gen2 chips and if they deliver it to the free market, the odds this chip to fit in the gen1 boards is very high. |
|
|
|
|
