How would you stop anyone from USA to participate?
I am guessing through KYC. Would you be checking those 20000 registration cause it seems like a tall order.

Still this is about $14 by current rates. So worth it.

Dev are not able to agree upon how big a block size there should be. It is highly improbable if not impossible for them to agree for this.

I agree with you though POS is better than POW any give day.

Well here is the thing. For me EMI license that brings in ability to get iBan accounts is equally awesome if not more as compliance.

Because as a user I would get to trade quite easy now. This is like your bank now giving you an exchange build in.

Apologies, My English failed me. 

I was under assumption that you would have multiple projects to work on. Which I see now that you have agreed. So as A bounty hunter, would be stuck on only one assigned project or can I choose for myself. And cannot change that project in future if I see returns are not good.

Never had a problem with the exchange. Always have a problem with gov regulations, and I dont see how this would be sorted out soon.

Cannot disagree more. BTC is old, sure it is has the most market cap. But Its not a good investment in any case.

Yea, Issue being. I could post shit and get our of current rank. Post has to have good content to achieve rank.

I started a month or two back so I dont mind. And This totally makes sense. But As a user I never look at Rank.

Although that's the thing with crypto. Gov can block exchanges from dealing with Crypto. They just cannot block crypto itself. So be happy, its all going to survive.

* Transform these legacy digital assets into token on a public blockchain that benifits both consumers and the enterprise-issues of these digital assets.


I need more information on this. The way any company or business provide loyality points is on assumption that these points would never be used. So someone would think that these points on blockchain would not help the cause.

But there is more.

I as a small business can provide these loyality points to my customer which I believe could be used somewhere else. So even though my customers are not going to use these points with my business they will still have a chance to use these else where.

I say that is a Win Win for both.

Point Case: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoover_free_flights_promotion

This time, all 3 parties win, except don't be that stupid when doing the promotion.

I need more info on how things would be distributed. Where can get info?

Its on Maintenance again?

This is like the second time within this month. I know upgrade could be a mess but come on. Get this going already.

I agree to an extend. I have seen same pattern in last two halving. There was a steep price rise and then a fall right after halving. So I am expecting real rise to be around 2020 halving.

Instead of investing so much in Hash power, just quarter of that $$$ to buy actual BTC and then you can control the market in much better way.

Its Zero unless those coins comes out. Although actual figure is somewhere around a million.

Perhaps you need to visit back alleys of Karol Bagh. 

Actually I did get an answer but not a proper one. Dont know if it was an admin but whoever it was said he will get back to me and never did. Then again its not a customer service but thats ok.

Still to point out, How does it matter if I was showing negative view?
Is current structure so weak that it wont stand any criticism?


I know, that's my concern. I dont have anything better to offer but I can point out what I see as an upcoming problem.


What kind of problem are you referring to. I would like to read something on it.

Yea, I dont think that would be fine. People can connect to what ever they want until they have options to connect. When they dont have they would have to connect to these centralized points/


Agreed, its not a solution but better then 1Mb block. Minor update to 2Mb or 4Mb would have solved lot of pressure when backlogs were high.

Good that I found this thread. I have been asking this question on r/bitcoin with no real answer. How is that LN will not cause centralization.

As I understand(Please correct if I am wrong) inorder for me to send BTC from A to B, I need to open the channel. So as a user I would have to do the same thing again If I have to send BTC from A to C (Unless B already has an open channel with C).

I think in long run we will see centralized points which have multiple open channel that users would connect to.

I know people dont like it but BCH atleast has a solution or even variable/flexible blocksize would solve in much better case.