We have presented at a specialist conference in Germany at the end of last month and received good feedback from colleagues in archaeology. we are in contact with a couple of colleagues interested in the project and in helping to develop the database. So there is interest in the project and we are looking on how we can integrate expertise to continue the development.

I am not really sure what you mean when you say: "because the area that the project pursues is not much interest".  I think most of the people that have been following this project have a romantic view of what archaeology and heritage is and look for an immediate source of income. For this to be successful and sustainable in the long run, we need to engage with archaeologists and the relevant stakeholders from the beginning, which is what we are currently doing. This means the project is running slowly, if compared to other current coins, but is creating a solid network of professionals in academia and outside that are interested and can help to develop a product that will be used. Now, as investor in this project, I do understand the frustration of the community as the price keeps dropping, but as archaeologist this is the right way to develop a final and useful product.