Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 09:26:25 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: How many of you are still here for the longterm ? on: August 08, 2019, 03:35:29 PM
I didn't buy anything I coudn't afford to lose, therefore I don't give a shit if it all goes to zero, THEREFORE I'll be here for a looooooooong time.  Tongue
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [DISC] Diskcoin|CPOC |Hardisk mining|No ICO / IPO|No premine|No airdrops on: June 27, 2019, 08:51:15 PM
using PoC2 plotfiles and beeing active is BHD, Burst and Boom.

@ Villentretenmerth: BHD shouldnt be put on the same level as Boom, which has recently proven to be a scam.

Hahahahahahaahahahaha

We will see about that.
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [DISC] Diskcoin|CPOC |Hardisk mining|No ICO / IPO|No premine|No airdrops on: June 27, 2019, 02:37:10 PM
Here's a hint as to why to keep closed source...so no one knows what sneaky things the developers are doing.

https://www.reddit.com/r/burstcoin/comments/c4v1yi/important_boom_coin_scam/

Crypto is about trustless systems right? Closed source does not follow this. It is just greed. Do you want greedy developers for a coin that you spend time, money, and energy on?

BHD also says they will be having open source "soon". More like "never".



Understand your concerns. When we make sure there are no fatal security issues, we will open source at the first time. After all, we want to attract developers from the POC community to participate in this project.



"(...)we want to attract developers from the POC community(...)"

Perhaps you can start by being more transparent. As is, this looks like just another shady cash grab from some obscure Chinese "devs" with large PoC mining farms looking to get rich at the expense of some equally greedy miners legitimizing their scam - no different than BHD and Boom.
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Boomcoin|An scalable anonymous currency system based on Proof of Capacity on: June 24, 2019, 12:30:36 PM
Discover the excellent cryptocurrency of the POC Ecology, find more partners to join the POC family, and share with you the topics related to POC ecological construction, mining, and cryptocurrency transactions.

This is a new link.

https://t.me/pocecological

What is this even supposed to mean?  Grin

Among many indecipherable and badly translated from Chinese expressions, "POC ecological construction" in particular? ROFL

From what ground holes these guys are coming from?
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Boomcoin|An scalable anonymous currency system based on Proof of Capacity on: June 18, 2019, 07:40:57 PM
Hi, did anyone find a original thought in the whitepaper? Seems like a blatant copy of existing material.

Well...

It is a copy.

Not only it's a copy, they managed to fuck up a lot of things, including the license.
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Boomcoin|An scalable anonymous currency system based on Proof of Capacity on: June 12, 2019, 05:10:11 PM
1) Your Enormous Cognitive Dissonance

How big of a troll I am? Do I need to spell it out?? We all know in the business of what the TERM "secret ASICS"  mean. How do we know he hasn't created something that could quadruple his capacity? 250 GB could mean 1 TB etc. The community sure was suprised with Helix despite all you high-iq "master coders/techies" reasoning.  We all know you only sell mining-type technologies when they are outdated trash for smaller alt-coins.

Scrypt was created long before even high single digit TB miners were created for Bitcoin for a REASON! If these quadruple BHD miners aren't here (I find that hard to believe with the salivating, thirsty PoCC) they will be soon.

2) Your Enormous Cognitive Dissonance Part 2

How can you authentically complain about BHD, when many of our miners are in cohoots with THEM. You strengthen/secure their network and make it function properly. Mining Burst only gives you 1/3rd of a penny a day. You're also complaining against a coin that is the only thing propping us up.  

Helix is the antminer s7 and you are too brainwashed to see the antminer s9, s17 (etc) is coming along.

PoC2 is DEADDDDDD!!!.


3) You are Brainwashed

P.S Nobody cares that it is more Eco-Efficient we got that....What we do care is small parties making a fortune!! That's what we care about!!
I don't care if it produces negative energy that makes a Warp Drive for 0 cost.

P.S.S If he emulates 1PB++ with burning  even a minimal amount of watts we are still looking at a small GPU coin type burning of power, rendering our Eco-Efficiency entirely meangliess with technological and capacity mass inflation.


The PoCC pre-ASIC lobby is probably paying you...

Your Enormous Cognitive Dissonance Part III: Brain Fart Unlimited

How can you claim the PoC2 format is "DEADDDDDD" because of GPU-assisted decompression and at the same time believe Chia and VDFs "will rule"? Chia will have ASICs too, so how does that work in your brain?
Miners will always try to increase energy efficiency and push the boundaries of what's exploitable, it doesn't matter what kind of hardware (or combination of hardware) they will use, or what is the consensus. Yes, energy-efficiency is a zero-sum game once a miner has no edge over the others, but that's the dynamic of mining, it doesn't matter if it's PoW, PoC, PoWCSPABCXYZ. AsicBoost, more energy-efficient ASIC technology in general is proof that something like that can also happen with Bitcoin, is Bitcoin broken and dead now?

In the end, Helix pushed the boundaries of PoC2 to the limits of "exploitable", and EVEN SO it cannot be economically viable for every mining rig (PoC mining is still predominantly CAPEX-heavy anyway). So now we have proof that not only PoC2 is the most energy-efficient mining algorithm, but cannot be "gamed" beyond what you can compress/decompress using PoW (the Helix format).
Therefore, PoC2 is not dead - Helix proves that Proof Of Capacity works!
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Boomcoin|An scalable anonymous currency system based on Proof of Capacity on: June 11, 2019, 11:11:50 PM
You know what?! Chia, Volume and Spacemesh with their VDFs will rule. Poc2 is a scam...Soon people will use FGPAS or  GPU farms to emulate more capacity. When scaled high it will have the power requirement of a GPU coin. Is doubling the capacity not bad enough? Kick these double agent miners out...FORK this coin. Bunch of members profiting off a scam!!!!! FORK THIS COIN. The dev's are rich with one account with 165PB (probably more) with a 15% premine with renting too......FORK THIS COIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

VDFs are sequential proofs of work. So basically, Chia is implementing PoC+PoW below the fancy name. I doubt it will be more energy-efficient than PoC2.

Calling PoC2 a scam just shows how big of a troll you are.

What I consider scam is the mortgage and staking implemented in these Burst clones. cPoC is lame as fuck, and concentrates the wealth on the creators. It’s a ponzi.

Burst is still the only PoC2 coin that matters.
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Boomcoin|An scalable anonymous currency system based on Proof of Capacity on: June 11, 2019, 09:32:03 PM
why trust rico666? some even say he killed burst. PoC-Consortium cheated the community. Now they want to charge miners a high fee when using helix. so much for the topic "professional approach"

how can a coin be killed? please, enlighten me. i'd really like to kill a couple (hundreds), so i could really use the info. for the benefit of all cryptocurrencies.
...

as for helix, you might want to check out the reasons why it is a closed source software that comes with a license that has to be paid: because the R&D costs, and even with the license price, it is still the cheapest TB one can buy for PoC mining - which will significantly level the playground, especially between the ~PB and smaller (50-100 TB) miners.

The only cheapest per TB you should be after is the price of a HDD. Not an external software. This is what BURST is about.

Read my Lips:

"PROOF OF CAPACITY"

NOT "Proof of GPU power with super fine software which doubles your HDD space in a magical way which costs you $1/tb and $4/tb for pro licence which you should buy at least 100tb btw"

And yes he killed BURST and now after other scamcoins like this one to scam more people.

He can't get enough of it now. Scam after scam, killing the old projects. Fucking degenerate.

I'd be careful about what you accuse others without backing it up with actual evidence.
 
He and the PoCC were leading Burst wallet development. Do you have any idea what that means in a permissionless environment?
In a nutshell, it means they can come and go without owing anything to anyone - or the "community" in this case. They were volunteers in forking the BRS, fixing the countless bugs and exploits that were present and improving it. The Burst community decided to follow their lead, and nobody was held at gun point to do so.

They left the wallet in a better shape than ever before. I don't know how that constitutes "killing" BURST. The fact that they decided - as a group - to not be involved anymore does not take away the merit of everything they did. You are just being plain mischievous or (most likely) ignorant.

Speaking of ignorant, you don't seem to understand what Proof Of Capacity is about at all. Just because the name says 'Capacity', it doesn't mean that stacking only HDDs is the most energy-efficient way to mine PoC2 plots. Or that there isn't PoW involved in a "pure PoC" setup, anyway (hint: there is). With Helix they made the PoC/PoW intermangling a little bit more evident, and actually made the "Burst/BHD/and_clones PoC" more energy efficient. Thinking outside of a box.

Suddenly, Helix is not an exploit of Burst-PoC, it's a cure.

So you see, I hope you somehow reach the logical conclusion that there's no such thing as "this is what BURST is about". BURST is about PoC2, and Helix is the un-gameable version of PoC2, nothing more, nothing less.

You know he could have let everybody use that software for free. Instead, he chose to sell it for money. There is a software called ETHpill, you can get it for free, why not Helix?

You want us to thank him for not fucking up the project while they were in charge? Well, they fucked it up actually.

If they were so great on developing burst, why did they even leave?

Boom and BHD are not even necessary at this point while Burst exists. This whole thing stinks.

Btw, come back with your real account. Don't be a coward.

I just checked this topic, almost all posters are newbies. Fucking multi account scammers.

DONT BUY THIS SHIT THAT's UH SCAM


Oh please, God forbid them for trying to profit from their expertise. Why don't you fill a complaint to Seagate when you buy their HDDs? Or to Walmart, for being the middle-man and charging you an extra. No? So suddenly it's OK to charge for a commercial product, be it hardware or software? You are making yourself look completely stupid on this one.

They left BURST because the community wanted to. I'm sure you weren't there and you know jack shit about what happened, judging by your "statements". But I was there and was involved, so I know better than you.

"Boom and BHD are not even necessary at this point while Burst exists" is the only sensible and coherent thing you said in your last 700 words.

And by the way, this is my real account. I don't usually post, but when I do, is to call bullshit on people like you spreading baseless accusations. Keep it up and you'll hear a lot more from me in the future.

Imagine being called a "fucking scammer" by a normie who has "CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK" and referral links in his signature to scam noobs.
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Boomcoin|An scalable anonymous currency system based on Proof of Capacity on: June 11, 2019, 09:00:15 PM
why trust rico666? some even say he killed burst. PoC-Consortium cheated the community. Now they want to charge miners a high fee when using helix. so much for the topic "professional approach"

how can a coin be killed? please, enlighten me. i'd really like to kill a couple (hundreds), so i could really use the info. for the benefit of all cryptocurrencies.
...

as for helix, you might want to check out the reasons why it is a closed source software that comes with a license that has to be paid: because the R&D costs, and even with the license price, it is still the cheapest TB one can buy for PoC mining - which will significantly level the playground, especially between the ~PB and smaller (50-100 TB) miners.

The only cheapest per TB you should be after is the price of a HDD. Not an external software. This is what BURST is about.

Read my Lips:

"PROOF OF CAPACITY"

NOT "Proof of GPU power with super fine software which doubles your HDD space in a magical way which costs you $1/tb and $4/tb for pro licence which you should buy at least 100tb btw"

And yes he killed BURST and now after other scamcoins like this one to scam more people.

He can't get enough of it now. Scam after scam, killing the old projects. Fucking degenerate.

I'd be careful about what you accuse others without backing it up with actual evidence.
 
He and the PoCC were leading Burst wallet development. Do you have any idea what that means in a permissionless environment?
In a nutshell, it means they can come and go without owing anything to anyone - or the "community" in this case. They were volunteers in forking the BRS, fixing the countless bugs and exploits that were present and improving it. The Burst community decided to follow their lead, and nobody was held at gun point to do so.

They left the wallet in a better shape than ever before. I don't know how that constitutes "killing" BURST. The fact that they decided - as a group - to not be involved anymore does not take away the merit of everything they did. You are just being plain mischievous or (most likely) ignorant.

Speaking of ignorant, you don't seem to understand what Proof Of Capacity is about at all. Just because the name says 'Capacity', it doesn't mean that stacking only HDDs is the most energy-efficient way to mine PoC2 plots. Or that there isn't PoW involved in a "pure PoC" setup, anyway (hint: there is). With Helix they made the PoC/PoW intermangling a little bit more evident, and actually made the "Burst/BHD/and_clones PoC" more energy efficient. Thinking outside of a box.

Suddenly, Helix is not an exploit of Burst-PoC, it's a cure.

So you see, I hope you somehow reach the logical conclusion that there's no such thing as "this is what BURST is about". BURST is about PoC2, and Helix is the un-gameable version of PoC2, nothing more, nothing less.
10  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Is trading stressful for you? on: June 06, 2019, 04:35:37 PM
About the original question - yes, it's stressful. Value investing is much more productive: use your time to earn money (not sit in front of a computer drawing straight lines on top of charts) and use that money to buy and hodl. You can't lose that trade.
11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Boomcoin|An scalable anonymous currency system based on Proof of Capacity on: June 06, 2019, 02:44:27 PM
why trust rico666? some even say he killed burst. PoC-Consortium cheated the community. Now they want to charge miners a high fee when using helix. so much for the topic "professional approach"

That's completely inaccurate. There's so many layers of bullshit in your "statements" that I don't know where to begin.

I will just scratch the surface:

rico666 contributed to the core wallet software significantly. In the space of a year the PoCC did more to Burst than all of the previous years of BurstNation-led "development" (being generous here).

In fact, the wallet was left in such good shape that you now start to see all these cheap code forks of the BRS popping up left and right, including Boomcoin.  Wink
 
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!