The main goal of a bounty campaign is to attract investors, right?
So why then don't they use any kind of referral links to know for sure which bounty participant brought more investors to the project? And then they could reward all the participants according to this information?

For example, let's take a Youtube campaign. A video that has only 100 views will be rejected in most campaigns and video with 1000 views will be accepted. But what if it was 100 views video that attracted at least one investor and 1000 views video attracted none?

The same with signature campaigns. You may be a Hero with shitposts which are not read by anyone, and you can also write great posts as a Junior, that will be catchy and thus will draw readers' attention to your signature. But still Hero will receive way more.

I don't say that it is unfair and should be changed, I just wonder, why the system of referral links is not used here? I'm so used to it, because it is everywhere on the Internet, it is used by each platform that wants to get traffic and reward its bringer. But not in bounties, why? Or maybe I'm mistaken about bounties' main goal?

Don't think you should all in into anything unless you're really confident. I would suggest you dollar cost average.

I guess no one will beat the value of bitcoin because bitcoin is the father of crypto. If that happens, that any altcoin passed the value of bitcoin that is a miracle and we should be happy for that.

Generally speaking, I will use the K chart to determine the direction of the market. Most of the time, the K chart is accurate, so it can be used for reference. I am a day trader.