Interesting experiment indeed. It would be good to see which coins did the best based on their position in the 100. For example, 1-10 positions, 11-20, 21-30 etc.

I would expect the top 10 will grow by less than say 41-50 or 71-80, but I may be wrong. So it would be interesting to see. If you find one or more groups to be a lot higher you could be into something.

I will be checking back to see how you get on.

If you really want to answer your question you will need to spend a few minutes researching the project. If you like the sound of the project and believe it has a future you should hold. Airdrops are good in that they disperse tokens to a wider audience. Projects that are better distributed tend to be less susceptible to whale manipulation and overnight dumps. In my experience if you hold for 6 months or more the tokens tend to go up again after the initial dumpers have exited.

ICOs are a novel and still developing form of capital raising. For legitimate projects ICOs are a great alternative to traditional VC funding due to flexibility and not giving up equity ownership. The money does not come for free. The team needs to execute the project and keep token holders happy. I have never come across a fake ICO where the founders ran away with the money. If those are the ones you are seeing, you are not researching properly beforehand. Should be able to tell if the team is allstar from google searches, Linkedin etc.

Trading cryptos is very difficult to be long term profitable. So many pumps and dumps it will stress you out. You are better off researching ICOs and picking winners that can go 10x or more. A lot less stressful and you can take you time to learn about the projects you are investing in. If you do decide to trade, don't be greedy. If you are up 50% the most likely way is down the next day or so. Take profits and move to the next. Don't be caught bagholding last weeks hot coin.

Top 10 coins are good to have as generally less volatile. You could also consider looking into some ICOs as if you pick well then there is the chance to make 10x or more if the project does well. Take a look at GoNetwork, Gems, Orchid. Some big ideas that could do very well if executed. Best advice I have received is don't day trade. Pick a few coins you like and hold.

My experience with Etherdelta is trades are frustratingly slow and ethereum network fees are high. There is a fee to deposit funds. There is a fee to place and order. There is a fee to make a trade. There is a fee to withdraw funds. To even get a transaction through in an hour you need to up the gwei and gas limit. I think the key to decentralized exchanges is the speed/fees of the underlying blockchain. Ehtereum is not able to handle the speed needed just yet.

I did not hear about any of these reports before I bought a few TRX yesterday. I just saw the 50%+ drop week on week and thought it was 'cheap'. Good to know what some of the background to the drop was. I think long term it is a good project and should recover lost ground. But as we all know crypto moves fast and there are always other opportunities.

Low market cap coins are good if you find a good team and good idea under the radar. Some that I am following are Hubii, Mercury Protocol and Aventus. All are strong fundamentals and real teams working hard to solve a problem. But you should check them out sooner than later as if I'm right they won't be low market cap coins for much longer. Aventus is 'supposed' to be listing on Bittrex any time, but seems no coins are being listed recently.

I wonder if I will ever get my NEM stake?

I presume the unclaimed/sock stakes are still sitting somewhere.

I certainly complained at the time I was wrongly socked, but have been quiet for a while. Shame, I would be a millionaire too like you guys.

I guess as the value goes up someone will start a class action lawsuit.I'd be all over that!

We can all help get it on Poloniex

https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

So conservative Mr Ease. Way worse projects are valued higher

I'm curious whether the advertised 150 token per Eth down to 100 token per Eth were the rates applied. Not complaining but I think I received more token than I expected. Anyone else notice this?

Perhaps it was because I paid with SNGLS which may have afforded me a better rate? I know there was a 5% bonus for using them but the tokens I got were more than 5% over.

Not sure why transactions did not go through right away. I sent a transaction right on 16:00GMT but the amount never left the wallet. I think it was the third try before a transaction went through by that time is was 16:13GMT. Weird.

Is it possible to see your TKN balance yet?

Don't know SNGLS worked. Only ETH transactions seem to be going through?

He means depending on the price of ETH when you bought.

I know we're all here for different reasons but it's funny to me that some are already judging success or otherwise at such an early stage. This is potentially a game changer, a challenger to Wikipedia. I say give it 2-3 years and your ICO investment will be worth many millions.

Will more LUN tokens exist in the future or is the 2.7m the total ever supply?

I wonder if that is supposed to say the etherscan total supply 2,703,356 multiplied by 0.78 which is 2,108,617.

I would love to see something come of Graviton. There are obviously still a few of us bagholding.