 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Wow, seems things went really well at the conference, thanks for sharing! |
|
|
|
https://bitbucket.org/kod_5/nemapiIf anyone wants to have a go developing something with c#, I've written an api library that can use any nis safely. You don't even need to set up the connection if it doesn't matter what node you connect to, it auto connects to trusted Dev nodes, all you gota do is not pass a connection to Accountfactory and the connection will set itself up. Its also a single line job to bounce between test net and main net. For now I would advise only using on testnet until I update the fee structure and do a few other things, I just don't have time atm. Should have it done soon tho. I tried to make it as simple to use as possible so once the library is imported you can literally copy paste the code in the read me into your project and it will work. Awesome! Thank you! Will try it out right away. |
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to buying a NEMborghini...
|
|
|
|
Ok thanks  Edit: I was just wondering because the download page says I should install Java 32/64 bit depending on the browser version (32 vs. 64), which is not the case on my system, but so far, everything works fine. |
|
|
|
|
Short question about about the remark on the beta download page: I use Firefox 32 bit and a 64 bit Java on Ubuntu - everything works fine. Why the restriction? I suppose the address/key generation is not affected by this, the data look fine and the client has verified them correctly...
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a question: I was on the ongoing stakeholder list (pos. 1218, thread 1, page 76), but now, I did not make it into the final list - was there a problem with the transaction? I thought it was okay because there was the 'Y' next to my entry. Can I somehow prove that the transaction was really mine?
Thank you!
ElDerek
You are marked with duplicate hash. This means theit either you used someone elses hash or your hash was used by someone else. You'll need to prove that you own the address that the payment came from. You can do that by sending another very small amount from the same address. Plz also provide a link to your original post. Hi, thanks for the fast reply, ok, I can do that (have to wait, my BTC wallet is a bit out of sync...) In the meantime, I had a look at the hash check document that was linked in the ongoing stakeholder list. My post with link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.msg4803396#msg4803396 at #1503 was from Jan. 28 7:29 PM and my transaction https://blockchain.info/tx/b42427a4159e88a54c8bbd1e9774ac859bb504683d620de0ccb8c8533359595ais from Jan. 28 7:28 PM (included in block 282928 from 2014-01-28 19:40:18 +12 minutes). The other post #1426 claiming the same transaction ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.msg4796858#msg4796858) is from 1:13 PM. Is this sufficient? If not, I'll be sending a small amount BTC from the same address as soon as possible... Thanks & regards ElDerek Plz send a small ammount. I know it's unfair because you're not the fraudster (or so it seems) but we'll need to make sure only the right people get stakes No problem! Luckily I hadn't emptied my wallet completely, so I could send 0.0001 BTC from the same address 12oGmnPso4X89zk6h2L21H3CgZxhVvnxhB, transaction is 60ba1a54137c1a666c0cef542e35fcac71aec324f900db7e59a42a8d538e45e8. Regards ElDerek |
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a question: I was on the ongoing stakeholder list (pos. 1218, thread 1, page 76), but now, I did not make it into the final list - was there a problem with the transaction? I thought it was okay because there was the 'Y' next to my entry. Can I somehow prove that the transaction was really mine?
Thank you!
ElDerek
You are marked with duplicate hash. This means theit either you used someone elses hash or your hash was used by someone else. You'll need to prove that you own the address that the payment came from. You can do that by sending another very small amount from the same address. Plz also provide a link to your original post. Hi, thanks for the fast reply, ok, I can do that (have to wait, my BTC wallet is a bit out of sync...) In the meantime, I had a look at the hash check document that was linked in the ongoing stakeholder list. My post with link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.msg4803396#msg4803396 at #1503 was from Jan. 28 7:29 PM and my transaction https://blockchain.info/tx/b42427a4159e88a54c8bbd1e9774ac859bb504683d620de0ccb8c8533359595ais from Jan. 28 7:28 PM (included in block 282928 from 2014-01-28 19:40:18 +12 minutes). The other post #1426 claiming the same transaction ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.msg4796858#msg4796858) is from 1:13 PM. Is this sufficient? If not, I'll be sending a small amount BTC from the same address as soon as possible... Thanks & regards ElDerek |
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a question: I was on the ongoing stakeholder list (pos. 1218, thread 1, page 76), but now, I did not make it into the final list - was there a problem with the transaction? I thought it was okay because there was the 'Y' next to my entry. Can I somehow prove that the transaction was really mine?
Thank you!
ElDerek
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
am interested, just sent 0.025 BTC from account 12oGmnPso4X89zk6h2L21H3CgZxhVvnxhB, transaction ID b42427a4159e88a54c8bbd1e9774ac859bb504683d620de0ccb8c8533359595a
Could you please confirm? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, sounds great! I'd be interested: 157vUJTHA3kXGUjLKisu63TCL1q9evmyhN
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
