|
Tanto la web como la aplicación móvil se quedan "cargando". Realmente funciona esto?
|
|
|
|
CrunchPool was not measuring hashrate properly, now that's fixed. Rest assured you were mining correctly and payouts worked fine, only reporting was off. For the time being, we have 0% fee! come mine with us: http://p2pool.crunchpool.com:9171/ |
|
|
|
I'm trying to get a p2pool setup going using the Windows binaries from James. From what I can see, p2pool is running properly (I see it reporting on the blockchain), but I cannot connect to it with my other mining machine. I'm trying to use my regular vtc wallet address as my username, not the p2pool address that appeared after install (actually I've tried both addresses).
"url" : "stratum+tcp://192.168.10.117:9171",
I get errors related to 'json stratum auth failed' and i'm not sure why. What am I missing?
Any address should work, try someone else's p2pool node to make sure it's not because of your miner for example: http://p2pool.crunchpool.com:9171/since you are around  It seems the hashrate isn't reported correctly on your p2pool, I tried it and I was getting things like 20kh/s Does the +0.00something appended at the end of the vtc address still works ? I tried it, and I wasn't getting any share at all what's your real hashrate vs reported hashrate? |
|
|
|
I'm trying to get a p2pool setup going using the Windows binaries from James. From what I can see, p2pool is running properly (I see it reporting on the blockchain), but I cannot connect to it with my other mining machine. I'm trying to use my regular vtc wallet address as my username, not the p2pool address that appeared after install (actually I've tried both addresses).
"url" : "stratum+tcp://192.168.10.117:9171",
I get errors related to 'json stratum auth failed' and i'm not sure why. What am I missing?
Any address should work, try someone else's p2pool node to make sure it's not because of your miner for example: http://p2pool.crunchpool.com:9171/ |
|
|
|
for those having low hashrate with ccminer:
append at the end of the command line "--diff 128".
That should fix it, please report your finding.
edit: actually the pool difficulty is also a bit too high (I am testing on give-me-coins now), if the difficulty was somewhat lower it would probably help
ccminer -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://*** -u S*** -p x --diff 128Now the pool displays the correct hash, thank you. on an other note, I can't get the correct hashrate on p2pool (crunchpool) even with diff 128 (and the number of share send is rather low for a p2pool) what GPU are you using? |
|
|
|
jamesl22, p2pool -> many R and high cpu load.
ccminer not work.
That could be a ccminer issue? do you have other gpus to try sgminer on? |
|
|
|
|
jamesl22, is there a CPU miner yet?
|
|
|
|
|
By the way, is there a CPU miner?
|
|
|
|
FYI, there's less than half a day left until Vertcoin switches the mining algorithm to Lyra2. CrunchPool will automatically restart and switch to Lyra2 when block 208300 comes. 0% fee for the first few weeks of Lyra2!, mine with us:[/b] http://p2pool.crunchpool.com:9171/ |
|
|
|
|
10.17.20 already??? ..... hopefully nothing's broken this time. do we need to update to .20?
|
|
|
|
I'm getting pretty miffed from the lack of support for p2p mining. Mining for 24 hours and only 4 blocks found- netting me an average 50% less than what I should have gotten if I was pooled.
I really do not understand why p2p is not preferred to pooled mining? No sign up, no autocash out, no pool fees? Am I just crazy?
To that end, are there any pools that I can connect to over port 80? Besides mu.pool since the hashrate there is waaay too low.
Some P2pools charge pool fees just so you know. Miners like consistency and they don't want to venture away from where the hash is since they want to even out their rewards. While p2pools can do equally well assuming there is enough hash behind it and enough time is given, most just follow where the hash is parked. Thus resulting in a catch-22 with decentralization/centralization. You can try Crunchpool (east coast), just 0.5% fee p2pool.crunchpool.com:7903 |
|
|
|
|
I think your formulas are a bit arbitrary. For instance, getwork latency is given way too much importance in the pool formula. And everything is linear.. and so on (latencies are mostly ok within a range before the problems they cause skyrocket).
|
|
|
|
|
Nice.. which dependencies are you compiling on msvc and which on mingw?
|
|
|
|
If you care to propose something technical, feel free to start a new thread. Otherwise, you're in the wrong subforum. Cheers.
Exactly. We should just ignore the guy, we're feeding the troll. He'd be building something if he had anything worthwhile or the money to waste on patents. |
|
|
|
Not looking good...  Buyers of physical will - in the end - determine the price. Good luck getting to "the end". ermember "markets can stay irrational longer than you can remain solvent" |
|
|
|
You clearly dont know what the hell you're talking about. First off, let me remind you off the bat that this a free distrbuted coin. Even if the worst happens, nobody loses anything. Second, you make a blatant copy of e-peso coin and claim that yours is the real e-peso and is guaranteed backed by the Philippine govt. Then when no one falls for your bullshit, you finally take your scam down. If you weren't gutless enough, you also had the nerve to come back here and make the very same claims your own coin was doing and are now trying to sell the domain to the devs you copied from. LOL. You're not very smart are you & how low can you go dude? Here, have a teaspoon of pride.  I explained the situation clearly in the OP, no misleading like there is here in the "real  " epeso thread. nobody loses anything? You're losing and wasting your time but since it's probably not worth shit anyway go on wasting it who cares. Btw, epeso.co and e-peso.org are still up for sale for interested parties |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
