Latest posts of: Flo354

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: January 22, 2014, 04:29:23 PM

Quote from: cbuchner1 on January 22, 2014, 03:50:55 PM Quote from: Flo354 on January 22, 2014, 12:13:02 PM 30 minutes after launching the new commit 111, my yacoin account was auto-locked because of too many attempts of connection. It seems weird. Someone else have this problem ? Maybe someone is trying to hack accounts over there by brute forcing passwords. Or some script malfunctioned and triggered false alarms. I analysed trame with the commit 111 binary posted on the forum. I analyzed all trames with wireshark and it seems that the executable is not malicious... he connects only with the yacoin mining, and never send datas with my pseudonyme. However, the keyword "error" is often sent by the server... So, weird story... I will stop mining with this executable (I'm not saying that there is a malicious function hidden since I have no proof) Anybody has the commit 82 x86 ? It seems that the link for download it doesn't works...

on: January 22, 2014, 12:13:02 PM

30 minutes after launching the new commit 111, my yacoin account was auto-locked because of too many attempts of connection. It seems weird. Someone else have this problem ?

on: January 22, 2014, 11:33:39 AM

Quote from: patoberli on January 22, 2014, 08:07:41 AM I built the latest commit (111) for you. Please note that this comes without any warranties or anything. Donations please go to cbuchner! Thanks @cbuchner for your continued work! 64-bit: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7qp3cwgufivu5jt/cudaminer_commit_111_x64.rar 32-bit: https://www.dropbox.com/s/z6aenjphoew7xs1/cudaminer_commit_111_x86.rar Thank you for the commit ! However, I'm experiencing some problems with this commit. First : The hasharate is slower than the other unofficial commit And sometime my NVIDIA pilote crash.

on: January 16, 2014, 07:30:30 PM

Quote from: bathrobehero on January 16, 2014, 06:41:50 PM It's there! I complete the survey but I made a mistake... The result for GTX 770 4GO is with N = 14 and not 15

on: January 15, 2014, 09:06:07 PM

Quote from: cbuchner1 on January 15, 2014, 08:51:19 PM Quote from: Flo354 on January 15, 2014, 08:43:33 PM Noob question but what is the utility of the -b option and what is mean ? With my GTX 770 4Gb, it is necessary to use the -b option, and if yes, how can i know what is the best value The best (in terms of fastest) is to use the same value as N. N is currently 32768 for Yacoin. Let me explain what is going on: scrypt-jane is running a for loop like this (which will take a loong time to complete, in the order of quarter to half a second. (i=0; i < 32768; ++i) { do a lot of work and memory access } -b 1024 instead runs 32 shorter for loops like this, with small pauses inbetween when interactive mode is enabled. This is the same workload as regular scrypt-jane hashing per loop. This is why I made this the default. (i=0; i < 1024; ++i) { do a lot of work and memory access } -b 4096 runs 8 for loops like this, which is an OK intermediate between the two extremes. This might be a good compromise for display smoothness if you're not planning on watching movies that is. (i=0; i < 4096; ++i) { do a lot of work and memory access } In the future, interactive mode may auto-determine the batch size to hit a desired target frame rate _exactly_. Christian Okay, thank you I understand !

on: January 15, 2014, 08:43:33 PM

Noob question but what is the utility of the -b option and what it mean ? With my GTX 770 4Gb, it is necessary to use the -b option, and if yes, how can i know what is the best value ?

on: January 14, 2014, 10:31:18 AM

Quote from: cbuchner1 on January 14, 2014, 10:26:49 AM I have had my fair share of dry spells even with >10kHash/s but then I just found another two consecutive blocks early this morning... Solo mining is a lottery. You are lucky But with all the time you spent for us (and you obviously), it's the least you can do !

on: January 14, 2014, 09:58:13 AM

My feedback for solo mining at 3.35 KH/s 23h -> 11h : no block found ! I think I will return mining on my pool...

on: January 13, 2014, 09:45:57 PM

Yes, that's why I will try this night and compare which is the best for me.

on: January 13, 2014, 09:32:57 PM

Quote from: ManIkWeet on January 13, 2014, 08:57:02 PM Quote from: Flo354 on January 13, 2014, 08:20:09 PM Quote from: ManIkWeet on January 13, 2014, 08:12:55 PM Quote from: bathrobehero on January 13, 2014, 08:00:51 PM 0 blocks for me under 15 hours @ 4,3 kH/s. Either you're very unlucky or something is wrong With my 3.35 KH/s is it better to solo mining or mining in pool ? From what I've read solo would be the way to go. Ok thanks, I will try this night...

on: January 13, 2014, 08:20:09 PM

Quote from: ManIkWeet on January 13, 2014, 08:12:55 PM Quote from: bathrobehero on January 13, 2014, 08:00:51 PM 0 blocks for me under 15 hours @ 4,3 kH/s. Either you're very unlucky or something is wrong With my 3.35 KH/s is it better to solo mining or mining in pool ?

on: January 13, 2014, 06:18:36 PM

I got 3.35 KH/s with my GTX 770 4GB on Ubuntu 64bits with the options : -l K22x1 -C 2 -i 0 I think it's quite good for this model.

Pages: [1]