 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
|
I don't understand why but version 21.5 is giving me a lot of rejects and GPU crashes mining ETH. I went back to 21.4
I haven't tried 21.6 but I'm not willing to right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Any chance of releasing the Absolute Core Clock feature for Turing and Ampere cards?
|
|
|
|
|
Why target Phoenix miner? It has the lowest fees in the market.
Shady
|
|
|
|
|
Someone with this mindset should go back to the Doge subreddit. A place where teenagers try to find the greater fool who will buy their bags.
|
|
|
|
|
Is T-Rex gonna implement the "Absolute Core Clock Setting" for Turing and Ampere GPUs?
HiveOS had an update recently which added that feature and it lowers power consumption anywhere between 9 to 30W depending on the card. From my understanding the Absolute Core Clock is a feature present in the architecture of the GPU so it should be possible to add it in the miner, right?
|
|
|
|
Both v20 and v20.1 seem to produce a lot of stale share…at one point 20.1 was producing 49 stale shares. Dropping back down to v19…if that doesn’t fix the issue, I am going back to Phoenix.
0.19.12 seems to be the most stable then? |
|
|
|
By the time XYM gets listed the altcoin market boom might have gone away  |
|
|
|
Anyone have stale shares increased in eth with this latest version??
Yes: news version stale bad share, a rollback to "t-rex-ver. 0.19.12-cuda111" no stale We are still waiting for me to dev, participate in the topics a little ... and explain to us !!! Did the version 0.20.0 fix the issue? |
|
|
|
|
Can't wait to dump this scam coin
|
|
|
|
Cut your losses and get the real NEM 2.0 - ProximaX.  Yep and wait for Lon Wong show with false wechat hype. That can do the trick  I will give that a shot. I like pump and dump schemes. Huh losses. I someone accumulated XEMs under 10 cents, now he has XEMs for 34cents and XYMs for around 50 (and it was around 70 few days ago), yep definetly that are devastating losses. Yes it is devastating losses because XEM will go back to less than 10 cents by the end of this year and people will either cut the losses or die along with this PnD scheme. |
|
|
|
Annoucement for todayBinance distributed airdrop to NEM holders and they have yet announced any listing support for Symbol, before the snapshot and today. I don't think they will ignore a coin that gives them good trading volume like Symbol. Price is unpredictable so in bull market, don't shake your hands too easily. Symbol (XYM) Distribution Is Now Complete Finally soon everyone can get rid of this scam coin and move on |
|
|
|
|
Devs making a lot of money in this XYM scam. Only listed in a single exchange and 99% of the people who opted-in haven't received their XYM yet, so they go on selling at these 60 cents prices and when the hodlers get their XYM they dump down to 10 cents
|
|
|
|
 so far so good T-Rex ok )) I don't know what kind of trick you're trying to pull. Are you selling innocent people a virus through this forum? Anyway, a 3070 laptop CANNOT be faster than a 3070 Desktop card. So stop boasting with lies, you're only making yourself a fool. A 3070 in a laptop has the same memory bandwidth as a 3060 ti and 3070 and more cuda cores then a 3060 ti. It can be faster then a desktop 3070 with an unlocked tdp vbios and/or a shunt mod. My laptop 3070 mines at 62 MHS. 62 is reasonable because the most Desktop's 3070s make 63 easily and some 64. Now 66 with 108W is completely out of reality and like you said it, there must be some kind of memory timings mod if that number is true. The way this user presents his results though... very fishy. I've seen before people like him selling viruses that "increase mining performance" through PMs in this forum. It goes like this: someone asks how he does this speed, he PMs the person with a proposal and.... you know the rest. |
|
|
|
I hope you wont be totally disappointed, if "your devs" aren't doing so cleanly Thats a sincere wish after reading old Nem forum writings. Specially the disagreement about how much XEM's were saved to Foundation accounts. The original plan was something like 25 % to F's but finally there was 50 - 60 %  Now six years later I cant avoid getting such an impression that most of the developers were young boys, who may have been genius crypto coin coders but less educated in ethics One interesting thing was also the lack of commenting by the leading coders. Apparently they didnt want to get dirt to their hands. If they wanted that Foundations get only 25 % then they said so. No comments at all means ,,,,, what ? Maybe one evolvement has been done in Symbol platform when they did drop the Foundations. Maybe also they read or even remembered the old disagreements. Or they just got older EXACTLY! This is the problem right? People defending this PnD that just happen in front of their eyes can't concieve that devs are certainly more tech savy and more scam savy than them. Exit scams are no blatant, otherwise they wouldn't work. Just look into the past, coins like NXT (which gave birth to NEM btw), pyramid schemes like Bitconnect. They all had exit scams not so obvious and delusional people, who hope they will regain their 80% loss in this coin, help them to do the exit scam unknownly because they protect them by default. |
|
|
|
so far so good T-Rex ok )) I don't know what kind of trick you're trying to pull. Are you selling innocent people a virus through this forum? Anyway, a 3070 laptop CANNOT be faster than a 3070 Desktop card. So stop boasting with lies, you're only making yourself a fool. |
|
|
|
This is a known thing about NEM, the old devs dumped and manipulated everything. Even censoring their channels from people stating facts. ProximaX claims to be the better improved NEM that split away from all the drama of the NEM community. ProximaX did the right thing by taking the code with them and distancing themselves away from NEM. This is interesting. I don't keep up with NEM news false promises, so now it makes a whole lot of sense why they did this PnD. Basically NEM is a organization of pyramid schemes. As soon as XYM is released on Binance (if it is...) XEM will go down to less than 100 satoshis. Dead scam coin. |
|
|
|
SEC is coming for NEM, it's just a matter of time. Look at XRP, it will be the same thing. PnD scheme go to jail
NEM is decentralized and public unlike XRP Yes because devs abandoned it after dumping their coins and making the smoke and mirror saying "we open the code for the community". What is considered by SEC is the status of the company at the moment of the scam. In the event of the airdrop, NEM was centralized and SEC will shut this clown work down. |
|
|
|
|
SEC is coming for NEM, it's just a matter of time. Look at XRP, it will be the same thing. PnD scheme go to jail
|
|
|
|
|
Can we call this the first exit scam of 2021? Good grief.
|
|
|
|
Quite a lame answer .... where is the definition of "scam coin"? If Devs cashed out, then Why in the NEM rich list ( https://nemnodes.org/richlist/) still exist Devs (Jaguar, gimre, Alice) with the same XEM amounts as since 2015 ? The one exact math, which is every time forgotten, is the fact that when someone sells, then also someone buys. According to the distribution list changes the big owners have not sold. Of course some of them have sold, but in the big picture they have not sold, because the Top100 has increased their ownings from 57 % to 71 %. Distribution Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:33:44 UTC:
Top Accounts XEM Percentage
Top 50 4,804,818,406.12 53.4%
Top 100 5,119,481,371.59 56.9%
Top 200 5,455,792,305.26 60.6%
Top 250 5,609,101,108.18 62.3%
Top 500 6,365,621,548.69 70.7%
All 8,999,999,999 100%
Distribution Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:39:36 UTC:
Top Accounts XEM Percentage
Top 50 6,166,236,694.24 68.5%
Top 100 6,423,452,170.92 71.4%
Top 200 6,739,353,256.10 74.9%
Top 250 6,890,203,307.06 76.6%
Top 500 7,543,466,571.50 83.8%
All 8,999,999,999 100%
That may be mainly caused by the exchanges' accounts (people have moved their XEMs there...), but still: the Top100 individual owners have not sold much of their ownings. Now can easily be detected only 3 names whose accounts have been "emptied": mixmaster, bogdana and rockethead. There may be different reasons: transferred to 3 MXEM nodes to harvest, or to exchanges to trade. Or to exchanges to ensure the XYM airdrop instead of "not-so-working-XYM-wallet-in-own-computer". Or to exchanges to sell some to cover the expenses of life. The last is the reason for some, no need for examples ... Tell yourself whatever makes you sleep at night. The only fact is: A coin that drops over 60% in price during a bull market IS a PnD scheme. I've been around long enough to recognize that. |
|
|
|
|
