 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
They have disabled withdrawal and deposit for ETH, since it is in the Awaiting Approval then these money frozen until they make a decision (give it back or release to the address you have put) but instead of doing this next time it's better to convert in another coin and then withdraw.
If this is true, why not give a warning when I try to make a transfer out? /rhetoricalQuestion I was just trying to buy something with 0.3 ETH, three days ago. Now I'm thinking it might be wise to get everything out. But in what format? BTC & ETH are really all I care about, and both are seeing delays? I would love to know if a service like Shapeshift sees this and adjusts which exchanges they use on the backend. |
|
|
|
|
Is it true that all of the full hex private keys are 64 hex characters long?
I have a friend that wrote down a private key years ago on a piece of paper. Unfortunately, he was messy on a few spots, and there's a hole on one of the characters, etc. I have written a program that will spit out all the possible combinations, then computed the corresponding WIF & public addresses, and then check the address for activity and balance.
In this case, the original private key combinations are ranging from 61 to 65 characters long. It would be nice to narrow down the combinations if I can safely discard the non-64 length ones.
(The reason I'm having a hard time being sure, is because you would be surprised what little shows up in my searches. Almost all talk about private keys starts with either compressed or the Base58 WIF Key. What little talk there is about the hex private key often mention 65 characters. I believe that's because of the prefix character added for computation. Also, when using bitaddress.org page for testing, even though an error pops up saying a 61 or 65 character private key is invalid, it then goes ahead and shows the results of the public address. For the 61-63 character addresses, it seems to be prefixing zeros to make it 64 characters long. Not sure how he computed the 65 length ones)
Thank you for setting me straight!
|
|
|
|
If you look on both of those links, you will see that the main payout sections to people , are the same on both pages. Please look at 7/22's payout from account, a6c04d203a17dfd197aaaa5de20006b778b72068cc12b8011564f993600e6242 I see my account in there (1QG58i...) receiving an amount (0.01806...) It matches what I see in my wallet. I assume this is the merged amount, because it's all I get. This transaction/amount for 7/22 I just pointed out is the same in both links you gave us. So I'm not sure where the split from #5 or #6 is showing up on the blockchain. Maybe there is some laundering before-hand I'm not following? |
|
|
|
I totally broke the website by accidentally overwriting the stats6 page. Fixing it is on the todo list.
I'd settle for just a a quick & dirty list in a post here of what GB#5 and GB#6 each paid out each week per share. We're 5 weeks behind. I have no idea if #5 is producing or sold off yet, or why this last week's payout went from .0245 btc to .007 btc. |
|
|
|
No you're not  I was also meaning to report this. Thanks. Ha! So I'm in good company, I see... |
|
|
|
Your miner5.php and miner6.php mining stat pages point to the same Miner5 page. Also, it hasn't been updated since week 9, and we are on week 12. Perhaps I'm the only one still doing ROI spreadsheet calculations But I can't do it when the payments from both come rolled up. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Call me crazy but are your customers losing money? What was the buy in and monthy cost for #2? Whats the ROI on your first 2-3 rigs so far? For group buy #2 is the math 3.6 bitcoins this week divided by 290 shares meaning each share produced .0124 bitcoin this week? Whats the monthly share cost? $24 a month profit is pretty painful.
I keep a very detailed spreadsheet. Due to the 0.12 btc/share tradein options into Group Buy #6, I closed out of my positions at: GB#2, 9 weeks, 79.4932% ROI * GB#3, 9 weeks, 107.3295% ROI GB#4, 7 weeks, 89.2052% ROI (If I had been previous owner, GB#2 would have been discounted and provided: 83.47% ROI) |
|
|
|
|
MWNinja,
I'm sorry, but I'm not seeing my name on the owners' list for 1 share?
A purchase was made/posted here on Feb 17th.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been a big fan of Electrum, thank you to the developers & those hosting servers!
I am running Electrum on 2 different computers. I noticed that when I updated Descriptions of all my transactions on computer#1, that these descriptions did not sync to computer#2.
Computer#2 shows bitcoin addresses instead.
I'm pretty sure they should sync, because I can see a few of the older ones do have custom Descriptions. (Although it is possible that maybe these were 'notes' I added to the transaction at the time I sent the bitcoins)
On one hand, I suppose my manual Descriptions aren't going to be on the blockchain, so they would have be stored locally. Is there a local file I should sync to computer #2?
(Computer#2 is version 1.9.7)
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Previous owner from GB #2, #3, and #4.
Please reserve 1 share for me. Thanks.
Waiting on Coinbase to come through again.
|
|
|
|
|
Bought 3 shares in Group #2, would like to reserve 3 shares here. (Waiting on coinbase to clear)
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
40th voter for FST!
ft9vkPhLgakYijRGe29ZA6mEsLcCQZD65P
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply!
I also reopened the wallet, and accidentally expanded the "Used" subfolder in the addresses. And there was the original address.
Due to the way it was lined up with the other 5 receiving addresses, I thought it was the 'folder' for those 5 addresses.
Are you suggesting to use a different address every time for BTC in general? Or for users of Electrum?
Would you say the same for major vendors online that accept bitcoin?
In my case, the coins I sent out were to a mining pool, and dividends will be paid back to the address they were sent from. So I was needing to keep this address for a while!
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I started using the Electrum Wallet today as I needed a thin client.
I was a little surprised to see 5 ready addresses in the wallet under receiving. (usually I add new ones when I want to) but I went with it.
And wasn't sure what "Change" addresses meant. Later I read about what they might do.
Here is my question: I Just sent some BTC out, Let's say 2.5 BTC out of a total of 2.7 BTC.
However all 2.7 was sent out. The 0.2 was sent to one of my Change addresses. This makes sense, I guess.
But now my original receiving address is not listed. The other 4 addresses all got bumped up the list, and a new 5th one was added.
Am I no longer 'owner' of that original receiving address?
All because it was 'zeroed' out?
If it's a published PAY ME HERE address, I won't get those BTC?
Thanks for any insight.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I would spread around some BTCs into alternative coins. I wish I wouldn't have bothered.
One exchange I used was BTer.com because it was the only place that seemed to have the largest variety of coins I was interested in. For instance ProtoCoins.
In the end, not a fan of low-amount dabbling in other coins on BTer. For example, for some reason I was allowed to BUY 10 quarkcoins. But now I can't sell them because I don't have enough of them. The 0.18% transaction cost on everything really adds up too. Also found out that since the exchange holds the coins for you, then you can't get any of the benefit ProtoCoins offers (such as matched coins from their new offerings).
Having said all that though, I think some full on non-dabbling is warranted. Early on, the developers at FeatherCoin looked like they were creating something good, and it would have been a great speculative buy. LiteCOin has a lot of action going on for it overseas and should be strong. FastCoin is... fast. Which they are trying to leverage. Just do some homework, and watch CoinMarketCap to watch the tide of money.
|
|
|
|
|
