Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 04:27:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][MULTI][VARDIFF] Pool|TradeMyBit - 0.5% Prop/Profit Swap/Auto-Exch on: February 18, 2014, 02:48:56 AM
Does it mean that Panda coin today can output 5x profit comare to LTC, or it only output 2.5x due to hash-rate difference?

According to my calculations, it is ~2.5x. The lower hashrate seems to be correctly taken into account for VTC, but not for PANDA. Looks like merc needs to look at it.
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][MULTI][VARDIFF] Pool|TradeMyBit - 0.5% Prop/Profit Swap/Auto-Exch on: February 12, 2014, 12:06:41 PM
Something weird is happening today. No new DOGE during the last ~12 hours for my 1.7-1.9 MHash/sec. The pool status message in the top of the page confirms my hash rate as well as the worker statistics. I do not see any noticeable increases in other currencies too. I'm not using auto-trade for DOGE.

Is it only me or it is a common problem?

From the dashboard graphs it seems that the pool was either doing extremely well for the last 12 hours, or it is exchanging more coins than it should. Could it be so that my coins are exchanged instead of being added to my balance?
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][MULTI][VARDIFF] Pool|TradeMyBit - 0.5% Prop Multit/Profit Swap/Auto-Exch on: January 28, 2014, 10:31:29 PM
WDC current reward is reported by Trademybit as 53.044.
However, according to Coinwars, it is 52.346044 at the moment.
Who is right and who is wrong?

I tend to believe Coinwars, as WDC reward is decreasing 1% every week, while TMB has been shown WDC reward as 53.044 for quite some time now.
Is this weekly decrease handled correctly on TMB?
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: January 24, 2014, 03:11:56 AM
The scrypt multiport has ~2Gh/s atm...2.000 Mh/s = 2 Gh/s
It's 20, not 2 (20,000 MH/s).
Trademybit is good, but at the moment it's better to mine MOON/DOGE, which are too large for TMB.
Block times seem to be correct now, hopefully withdrawals will follow.
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: January 24, 2014, 02:56:43 AM
Also, block time is incorrect for MOON/DOGE.
No way it takes a 20+ GH/s pool more than 2 hours to find a block given the current difficulty.
Maybe this is related to not processing withdrawals?

Anyway, while I'm typing profits are going down... Thanks Multipool.
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: January 24, 2014, 01:57:17 AM
My MOON/DOGE withdrawals have not been processed for the last 2-3 hours.
Is it going to happen any time soon?
Thanks
7  Other / Beginners & Help / Tx fees on Trademybit on: January 19, 2014, 10:59:59 PM
Dear merc82,

just registered on the forum, so unable to sent a PM or post in Trademybit section.

I'm wondering is it possible to only charge Tx fees on withdrawals of amounts above certain limit like Multipool does? For example, only charge 0.1 WDC if you are withdrawing less than 1 WDC? Tx fees for some currencies are small, but for others (specifically WDC and DGC) are quite high considering their exchange rate and difficulty. For a small rig (2-5 MHs) it can take a few days to mine enough WDC/DGC before tx fee/withdrawal amount ratio becomes reasonable (i. e. to get 1% ratio you need to mine 10 WDC/DGC). Such rare withdrawals kill the idea of mining the most profitable currency and selling it asap.

Because of this fact small miners may be forced to use auto-exchange, which is a nice feature, but it's good to actually have a choice.

Otherwise a nice pool, good to know that the developers are actually trying to work for you. Thanks for doing a great job.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!