 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Drake Wins $1.4M in BTC at Stake.com With Rams Super Bowl Victory Over the BengalsBased on the bet slips Drake shared, he placed bets on Rams star player Odell Beckham Jr. making a touchdown anytime during the match, Beckham Jr. finishing with over 62.5 receiving yards, and the Rams winning Super Bowl. Out of all these bets, two won, giving Drake an estimated win of $710,900 and $711,600 in BTC. He lost his $392,700 bet on Beckham Jr. finishing with more than 62.5 receiving yards after Beckham Jr. went down with a knee injury and never returned to the field. More details: https://www.bestbitcoincasino.com/news/drake-super-bowl-stake/ That's fantastic. Always loved those success stories about guys winning huge amounts in casinos or via bookmaker platforms. Unfortunately, my experience is a bit tiny:) |
|
|
|
Why is Stake still member of Cryptogambling foundation while hosting not provably fair and sketchy slot games?
Why don't you say anything about Onehash for example? They are also hosting third party games AFAIK. If fairness is something you care about, you should ask for all the gambling sites currently listed on CGF, and not for Stake only IMO. I can't speak for all members of the CGF but I will say this. Provably fair gaming is important and maintains a major part of our website. However, we cannot ignore the fact that people want to play games like livedealer and it is simply impossible to compete at a higher level without partnering with the providers that people want. Provably fair has not been embraced by the greater industry because it is not in line with the current game testing required by regulators and providers are not seeing great value in it. The CGF has been met with great resistance when trying to fight these matters. But I would like to see a reboot of the CGF with all the big crypto gambling players involved to lobby in unison for positive change regarding the legal acceptance of crypto in regulated markets along with a push for provably fair. All the CGF represents is a group of likeminded people, I cannot say it has been a great success but we will be organizing soon to discuss the future. If other members have issues with Stake/Onehash third party software then I invite them to voice their opinion to have those sites removed. Thanks for sharing details with us. Very useful information. I have never issued any probs with stake btw. |
|
|
|
Even if the casino is good I don't think I will sign up I will have to check the terms of service of the casino why they are asking this information and if they ask KYC to all their members, Crypto casinos follow and adhere to anonymity and they only ask for KYC if the account is abusing, so far all the casino I sign up only ask for usernames and emails no basic information.
I salute your decision. But casinos/gambling site should take KYC to avoid abusing their system. Either that is for privacy or for abuse any of their system eg: bonus, referral, fraud or something like that. Hope, you will be agreed with this argument. ^ I agree and that is definitely right. Every casino that has full of promotions and bonuses, will most likely implement KYC compliance. This is to stop from being abused by the users of those promotions and bonuses systems, I did not have a problem with a simple KYC like did not ask photo or ID when registering the casino, mobile phone verification, and email address would be fine. However, I don't think OP is a part of the team, after posting here, OP did not come back to answer those questions and it seems to be unprofessional thread. They just anticipate the influx of the participating people by having KYC could stop abusive individuals to participate in their promotions. I know their idea is great but being concerned about KYC won't let them join and just ignore it. But for me, I'd become hesitant to casinos asking KYC, I keep my identity anonymous. That is a big question, OP is not active anymore and I don't think he's coming back. that's one warning signal here. the OP is not active and if you encounter any prob, you don't know if he will respond to you or to other users here. let alone, if they are requiring kyc. there are better casinos out here that are not requiring kyc. so i don't think they are fast growing casino as claimed by the OP. maybe some will try as they have good welcome bonus, but for those who will try, check the conditions first attached to this bonus because you may be surprised once you want to withdraw your money. I think we have to give him a chance:) may be he will be active in case of true troubleshooting. |
|
|
|
One thing I don't understand? What is wrong with you? Why everyone of you assume that you will just do a new account? I never had 2 accounts on stake, member since 2017, why would I have 2 accounts?! Why would I create another? To have problems with withdraws, even with my addiction this is common sense. Stake does not have self exclusion, that's it. They act without remorse and not in good faith in the relation with the customer. This is already a fact, nothing to talk more about it.
As example on a casino I play a lot, they just banned me manually for 1 month because I was playing last weekend too much (this is gambling responsability from the casino.).
That's the point. Having two accounts and all those things may lead to other even bigger issues with a casino or a bookmaker. |
|
|
|
|
