Thanks for clarifying.... we actually built this farm in a way that all rigs had GPUs of similar memory manufacturers together (ie: Samsung, Micron, Elpida, Hynix).... we just need to figure out now which one gets the best performance with the rxboost with our tests and configurations

We have our cores maxed out on all rigs at 1100-1150 (any further crashes rigs) ... the rigs in this particular farm have been fine tuned to the max possible settings via multiple trial test. Still no changes with rxboost, but v14.5 is definitely more efficient than prior versions, and as you can see has brought higher hashrates overall by simply updating

Here are some results from another farm we manage and operate running on Windows.

Specs:

OS: Windows
Claymore Version: 14.5

Farm (MH/s) BEFORE Update: 11,942.107 MH/s
Farm (MH/s) AFTER Update: 12,034.358 MH/s

Change MH/s: +92.251 Mh/s (Overall Farm)
Change %: +0.772% (Overall Farm)

Upon updating to v14.5 we noticed that running the miner alone WITHOUT the -rxboost command gave us the best results on this particular farm running Windows. Running either configuration of the following commands, -rxboost 1; -rxboost 30; -rxboost 50; -rxboost 75; -rxboost 100 - actually gave us 1-2 Mh/s decrease hashrate (Overall in Rig; ie: 356Mh/s (NO rxboost) --> 354 Mh/s Using -rxboost + (various parameters mentioned))

We would like to know the what other miners have experienced using this rxboost feature, and if they had similar results on WINDOWS.

Disclosure: ALL GPU's on this farm are RX570/580 (4GB+8GB), and have been individually tuned by RigSpec with custom vBios straps and memory+core timings have been fine tuned, so they were already maxed out prior to the v14.5 update for the most part; hence why the increases are not as great as results posted previously on the SMOS farm we manage.

Detailed Chart - Individual Rig's:

https://ibb.co/sWXkSDs


https://www.RigSpec.io

Anyone test the power consumption difference with "rxboost" command? Also for those who are having trouble keeping it "rxboost" stable on windows, try -rxboost 30 .... seems to be the most stable for Windows and SMOS (rxboost -i 30) rigs without crashing systems. I've attached a chart for a mini farm we operate (SMOS - 4.0 Gh/s), and we noticed a 3.38% overall gain within the farm (approx. 135.74 Mh/s Increase overall). I attached a chart with details.

Again our main concern is power consumption increasing (hopefully decrease?  ) , as we currently don't have access to power readings due to farm being remotely located. We will test the power levels in person soon, but we would like to know a range for expectation purposes, if anyone already tested.


Chart Showing Gains from 'rxboost -i 30' (SMOS):

https://ibb.co/THyqpGP



Disclosure: Rig 11 and 13 seem to have been 'underclocked' prior so try to refrain from using those as a we also fine tuned some timings on those on top of 'rxboost'



https://www.RigSpec.io