Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Right now it is just the existing community (cryptocurrency geeks) trading. Next time bitcoin goes on a rampage, lots more articles will be written bringing in new blood, and anon coins will be the HOT NEW THING. a rising tide lifts all boats and super is well positioned.
|
|
|
what about supersend in CLI for those on linux or that don't use GUI? Maybe add a sendtoaddressanon RPC call.
|
|
|
Some Feedback:
1) Why bother with Phase 1? I think what people want is fully decentralized, trustless anonymous coin. The first coin to do it will be very popular. Implementing phase 1 seems to me like it may simply divert a lot of time and energy from achieving phase 2. Not just in terms of initial development but also building out the infrastructure, bug fixes, documentation and support, etc, etc. So if phase 2 is achievable, why not just announce that is the roadmap/goal/plan and go for it? Requiring a trusted third party (phase 1) just does not interest me and probably many others.
2) The document does not seem detailed enough for any third party security researcher to fully grasp the workings and audit the logic. I don't believe any coin will reach full value/potential until that hurdle is cleared.
3) It is unclear if mixing will be a) the only possible way to send, b) the default way to send, c) opt-in way to send. My recommendation for an anonymous coin would be (a). If it is known that everyone is mixing, then mixed transactions do not stand out or look suspicious. There is much more noise, and correspondingly less signal to follow than in an opt-in scenario. (a) would also mean the highest level of fungibility, which is generally considered a useful property of a currency.
4) I did not see defined how a node (phase 2) would know which of its peers can be used for mixing.
|
|
|
Andrew Jackson. His campaign slogan was "Kill the Bank". And he did it. Despite the head of the central bank, Nicholas Biddle vowing to ruin the economy first.
Jackson also paid off the national debt entirely. The first and only president ever to do so.
Detailed in the book: "A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II"
Jackson didn't even need bitcoin.
|
|
|
A sexcoin mining operation at full tilt. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynortis.com%2Fzout%2Fsxf%2Fmines01b2.jpg&t=663&c=JcR1ONagxSo2ng)
|
|
|
coingrl is a one woman sexcoin marketing machine. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FBjOc45yCQAAakH4.jpg&t=663&c=pv-yN5Dh2FhebQ)
|
|
|
the first, and still my favorite. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ffap.to%2Fimages%2Ffull%2F51%2F100%2F1005282830.jpg&t=663&c=5KGSXe39W3G-zg) Geronimo!!!
|
|
|
Yes it is scrypt. What do you have against scrypt? Litecoin uses it, amongst many others. To my mind, scrypt is presently the closest thing to Satoshi's original vision... lots of people are able to participate in mining scrypt coins and it has been relatively stable without having to buy new hardware every 2 months like in the sha256 world. The SXC client did have some problems with sync'ing the blockchain for a while, and development slowed to a crawl, but there has been a shakeup and now there are new people working on both the development and promotion side, so things are happening again and I sense more excitement in the community. That is also why I think it is a good buy and I am holding for at least the next year to see where it goes. How is Sexcoin blockchain secured though?
Its not scrypt is it? If so again its stupid to bother with crap that cannot be secured.
-MarkM-
|
|
|
Sexcoin (SXC) has been going down (or sideways) for a long time and seems like a good buy. It has an active community of developers, artists, merchants and enthusiasts building out software and infrastructure. We've even got a sexcoin girl or two.
Most of the discussion is taking place over at sexcoinforum.org. Check it out.
|
|
|
Another Sexcoin original by Lyno. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lynortis.com%2Fupload%2Fs2%2F02-pool1-2.jpg&t=663&c=Lqw3khkc04Z01g)
|
|
|
This image is by our very own coingrl80, proud SXC owner, model, graphic designer, and advocate. She did everything except press the camera button. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FL1au7fb.jpg&t=663&c=0wc5iR4_jN32wg) Tips 4 coingrl80 at: S66C4UMnpdwEWDgGPLFa94QRTsnvnwGk1b
|
|
|
that dude is either the original sexcoin creator that disappeared or a very early miner. :-) Haha, only for a lot of Sexcoins... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|