Show Posts
yeah, two full nodes are not meaningful, as I experienced too late.
Anyhow, I try to NAT it manually.
Cheers
WB
Does running a full node affect the units hash rate?
Also, I have 2 Apollo's. If I decide to go the full node route, should I put a full node on both units?
Also, I have 2 Apollo's. If I decide to go the full node route, should I put a full node on both units?
No it does not, the only effect you might see if a less response Web UI while the node is loading for the first 15-30 minutes after you start it up and while its syncing.
Hello there
upgraded my both Apollo batch 1 to full nodes, running fine so far.
Indeed only one can use the uPnP, the second one gets dismissed, e.g. debug.log of litecoind one second node.
2020-08-02T17:34:30Z AddPortMapping(9333, 9333, xxxx) failed with code 718 (ConflictInMappingEntry)
It's clear because I just have a single internet connection (public IP) on the ip table of the internet modem does not allow duplicate entries for same incoming port 9333.
There I tried to following, routed to port to another internal rasbpi device, installed HAproxy on it and noted both apollos as backend server.
Does not really work. I believe the litecoin client must use the "externalip" command, but this is just a thought.
So if anybody got two apollo full nodes behind a single IP running, I'm pretty thankful?
Many thx
WB
This has been already answered a few pages ago. Please search...
OK, more easy for you https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081750.msg54298707#msg54298707 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081750.msg54301554#msg54301554
To have two or more full litecoin nodes using same IP it is not a great idea. Too much trouble, few benefits. Better one node only with one IP.
