Bitcoin Forum
August 24, 2024, 07:21:39 AM *
News: All versions of Windows are affected by a critical security bug; make sure you update.
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 431 »
1  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: They will find someone to blame for their mistakes on: August 23, 2024, 09:39:46 PM
Betting sites are just about making profit, so if adding this option benefits them they definitely will,..But I think there are some presidential elections that has a clear and predictable outcome especially when the citizens of that country are desperately looking for a change and hope on one of the candidates for what they need..An example of what I'm saying is the presidential campaign going on the united states', The US is in a chaotic state at the moment and 70 to 80 percent of the citizens are hoping on Donald trump to fix it because he's the only that has the capability to do that right now, in this case wouldn't it be easy to predict??
You are right, betting sites will not care and they will only focus on looking for profit opportunities from this type of betting. However, the presidential election will not be able to be predicted accurately, even if you analyze that the majority supports a certain candidate but it is not guaranteed that the candidate will win the final poll, they do not represent all the people of the country and we can say they represent some of the supporters who vote for a particular candidate.

I have predicted the presidential election based on the analysis of supporters but the fact is that they have everything to recruit participants with money and those in power can have the opportunity to manipulate votes to win certain pairs of candidates.

it is rare to see a betting site that will care for users well-being
unfortunately they won't care so much as long as you are spending
and some say that even the sports betting books will end up banning you if you start winning too much

it's a jungle out there
Naturally, if you start winning too much, then this definitely raises questions on the part of the casino and betting sites are certainly not interested in losing money instead of earning it.  Therefore, all sorts of difficulties and obstacles from the casino in the event of a series of winnings are almost guaranteed to take place.  And you need to be prepared for this.  Then, for example, you don’t have to be indignant that you are forced to undergo KYC, which for some reason does not suit the casino.  And it is simply impossible to pass it, for example, because of the country where you registered your citizenship.  Or vice versa because of the country where you live.  I think there are many such ways of not paying lucky winning clients from the casino side. 
And most of the methods are also well justified from a legal point of view.

don't take me wrong here
they even NEED some success stories to use it as example and to give people hope, so MAYBE there's a small chance you aren't banned
but truth is most people will lose money and the casino owners are the only ones who are guaranteed to win longterm
sad that this happens over the expense of so many people
I'd say it's a negative sum game
pure jungle out there
Exactly, you said - our relationship with the casino can be characterized in many cases as "the jungle", or, for example, as the "Wild West" in America in the 19th century. Almost always, when playing in a casino, the player does not leave such a latent feeling that after some time you will definitely encounter some difficulty in the game, first of all, of course, when withdrawing money to your wallet, especially if you won some significant amount. This feeling usually spoils all those pleasant moods from gambling. Sometimes, when the hassle with withdrawing money after a joyful win begins, the mood goes into minus, becomes irritation and resentment
2  Economy / Gambling / Re: How will I know I'm playing on a reliable online casino site on: August 23, 2024, 09:18:29 PM
<snip>
Yeah.  I completely agree with you that the fraudulent aims of the casino are indeed immediately exposed by experienced gamblers who write a corresponding warning here on the forum.  And if you consider that many forum users very seriously value their rank on the forum and their reputation in the community, which many of them have achieved over the years by communicating with other users of our forum and receiving merit, then it is immediately clear that such authoritative users will almost never misinform others  , write lies or false information about the casino.  So, yes, the quality of studying the topics of a particular casino on the forum provides a lot of truthful and objective information.  Unfortunately, I believe that relatively few new forum users register on the forum now, much less than, for example, in 2017, but I hope that many people simply read the topics about casinos and the Gambling section general without registering.
Many knowledgeable users with high experience in casino ratings can help beginners get an idea of ​​which casino is a good one to choose. Usually these users tend to recommend old casinos that have a good reputation and are trusted by many customers, but do not necessarily doubt all new casinos. I agree that they can provide new users with the information they need, just that every gambler should not rely on the good reviews of these people.

Good reviews from experienced users certainly help new users get the information they need, but these people are not responsible for any financial losses that other people will experience. Every new gambler should know that and they should be able to weigh the various risks and only gamble wisely and responsibly.
This is really a question that experienced forum users cannot always help resolve. I mean information about the quality of work of such casinos that are new to the gambling market and are themselves new to the gaming industry. Experienced users simply may not have an objective and truthful opinion about such casinos. It is simply that too little time has passed since the entry of completely new casinos into the market and it is simply impossible to draw any conclusions about the quality of work with clients. Experienced users in this case simply honestly say that they do not have reliable information and they cannot suggest solutions.
3  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling with stablecoins, Fiat, or crypto? on: August 23, 2024, 09:08:37 PM
I agree with OP.  Indeed, the use of cryptocurrencies in gambling is now much less than fiat, but this ratio is constantly shifting towards greater use of cryptocurrencies. 
Here we all must take into account the possibilities of non-custodial wallets, when you are actually both the owner of your money and at the same time a banker for this money.  And this combination of possibilities has one obvious advantage: no one will be able to block your money.  But with bank accounts, you are constantly under the threat of such a decision from the banks where your accounts are opened and used.  I see this option of non-custodial wallets for cryptocurrencies as an undeniable advantage compared to regular fiat accounts. 
And here, stablecoins can very well perform the function of your money while playing in a crypto casino.

Both the gambling site and your wallet need to be non-custodial to obtain best results. If you deposit your crypto in a custodial gambling site (otherwise known as centralized), then you can easily expose yourself to KYC or even fraud (if the house decides to run away with the money). For full privacy and complete control of your crypto, decentralization is the way to go. Unfortunately, there aren't many gambling dApps out there. The tech is still in its infancy. Centralized crypto gambling sites are the dominating force of the industry. At least for now.

If you don't care about your privacy or financial sovereignity, use whatever currency you want to gamble. But if you care, choose crypto instead. Just remember to gamble wisely, and there should be nothing to worry about. Wink
That's exactly what you said about playing smart.  This also means choosing cryptocurrencies.  And apparently there is a preference for paying for the game in cryptocurrency rather than in fiat.  In my opinion, cryptocurrency payments in the field of Gambling are just one of the elements of a smart game, but if you weigh the pros and cons of cryptocurrency payments, you begin to understand that cryptocurrency is still preferable for many reasons.
 But a lot has been written about this in this topic.  And a smart player will certainly take all this into account.

Responsible players will choose what's best for them, and that's the main thing going Grin Being smart and thinking about ahead is great and is beneficial for those willing to.
However, sometimes even the smartest person, foreseeing future events, based on iron logic and common sense, as well as on his experience. However, life constantly makes adjustments to the events predicted in advance by this smart person. Life is an interesting, exciting adventure, full of completely unpredictable events and accidents, no matter how smart and far-sighted a person is. But sometimes it is impossible to predict. This, of course, fully applies to the player's luck in gambling.
4  Economy / Gambling / Re: How high is the probability of accusations vs. casinos in BitcoinTalk are true? on: August 23, 2024, 08:56:28 PM

Yes, most likely an unprepared reader of such posts and messages with claims against the casino, who is not familiar from the point of view of knowledge of jurisprudence and the ToS provisions of any casino, will not be able to figure out who is right and who is wrong. 
In general, I don’t really understand the motives of those people who start discussing complaints about casinos in the public space simply because there is a very low probability that someone will write sensible advice.  Maybe such cases do happen, but in my opinion this is rare and the whole discussion usually comes down to sympathy for the victim and cursing at the casino and their ugly support.  Maybe, of course, this is a hidden form of anti-advertising.  But this method is somehow too sophisticated. 
But with the exception, of course, of the well-known mass claims such as 1xbet.

I think that in the social aspect many people have this belief that at some point they must win or win in a casino, and when they lose a lot of money they see it as very bad and therefore they do not like it and they start to make accusations to see if they can find some kind of support, however they do it without foundation at the regulatory level , they are the ones who say yes to the Tos without even Reading a little and at least Realizing what it is about , so it is difficult because it is not how they think, but how it really is.
And such a state of resentment and unpleasant feeling that you were deceived naturally arises in any player after a series of losses.  And especially, of course, for inexperienced gamblers.  And this feeling is precisely what forces the offended player to take some action to accuse the casino or individual casino officials or even ordinary support employees.  And if the arguments are not enough, then the player finds an outlet in public space, on social networks or on forums or in interviews with some bloggers.  And thus the accusations, of course, spread among the public and, in general, can still bring trouble to the casino itself. 
And on the other hand, such an offended player also receives some kind of compensation for his offense, this also helps him overcome this unpleasant feeling.

It is not always about the ToS, sometimes the ToS are clear enough, but they do not follow standard practice or impose conditions that are not really that great or even acceptable. Reading everything may be too much to ask for a conventional player that is not going to be betting much, but the player may become equally frustrated and put forward a claim if the site annoys the person enough.
Well, it is true, it is true that if a person is not going to play a lot and make big bets, then naturally he almost never reads ToS. Or he reads inattentively and does not understand in detail some points of the rules, which can later bring critical errors. And such a player often figures out for himself how the casino should act in a given situation simply from considerations of common sense. However, this does not always work.
But if the bets are big, then of course you need to read the ToS in detail and in detail. And the fact that the casino allows tricks when interpreting its own rules, then this is, in my opinion, a common practice in complex, confusing situations, which periodically still take place simply in the life of a player.
5  Economy / Gambling / Re: Gambler Loses 1.4 million USD in a bet with lower than 1.01 odds! on: August 22, 2024, 06:14:04 PM
It's obvious that money is not the issue of this guy, regardless, he should have kept that adrenaline in check.

I wouldn't be so sure here. Yes, he did have $1.4m available to gamble, but that doesn't mean he could afford to lose it.
People with millions to toss around would unlikely bother making a x1.01 odds bet. The guy was looking for a near-certain win, meaning he wanted/needed money but wasn't willing to accept any higher risk.
I really doubt he was a multi-millionaire. More likely he used money that was meant for something else. At least that's what I'm guessing.

It also seems to me that this guy is not a multimillionaire.  Usually such people cannot afford to make such bets simply because of one important psychological feature.  Such a bet, made by a multimillionaire and becoming public knowledge, and this will inevitably be due to the obligatory leak of information, will certainly have a negative impact on the general image of such a person.  This action is simply unacceptable among such people because it clearly tells his partners that this is a person with whom one can do business with obvious benefit for the opponent, he is not careful and serious enough.  And all this is an excellent indicator of a bad businessman.
6  Economy / Gambling / Re: How high is the probability of accusations vs. casinos in BitcoinTalk are true? on: August 22, 2024, 05:56:29 PM

Yes, most likely an unprepared reader of such posts and messages with claims against the casino, who is not familiar from the point of view of knowledge of jurisprudence and the ToS provisions of any casino, will not be able to figure out who is right and who is wrong. 
In general, I don’t really understand the motives of those people who start discussing complaints about casinos in the public space simply because there is a very low probability that someone will write sensible advice.  Maybe such cases do happen, but in my opinion this is rare and the whole discussion usually comes down to sympathy for the victim and cursing at the casino and their ugly support.  Maybe, of course, this is a hidden form of anti-advertising.  But this method is somehow too sophisticated. 
But with the exception, of course, of the well-known mass claims such as 1xbet.

I think that in the social aspect many people have this belief that at some point they must win or win in a casino, and when they lose a lot of money they see it as very bad and therefore they do not like it and they start to make accusations to see if they can find some kind of support, however they do it without foundation at the regulatory level , they are the ones who say yes to the Tos without even Reading a little and at least Realizing what it is about , so it is difficult because it is not how they think, but how it really is.
And such a state of resentment and unpleasant feeling that you were deceived naturally arises in any player after a series of losses.  And especially, of course, for inexperienced gamblers.  And this feeling is precisely what forces the offended player to take some action to accuse the casino or individual casino officials or even ordinary support employees.  And if the arguments are not enough, then the player finds an outlet in public space, on social networks or on forums or in interviews with some bloggers.  And thus the accusations, of course, spread among the public and, in general, can still bring trouble to the casino itself. 
And on the other hand, such an offended player also receives some kind of compensation for his offense, this also helps him overcome this unpleasant feeling.
7  Economy / Gambling / Re: bookmaker refusing to do KYC in advance - fortune jack btw- on: August 22, 2024, 05:46:40 PM
I consider this normal simply based on the laws of operation of any business.  Including in the gambling industry.  This law clearly tells us that minimizing expenses and maximizing income is what any normal, sane businessman does, and this is obvious and correct.  So, any businessman will reduce expenses that, to some extent, can be considered not entirely necessary or that can simply not be spent.
I beg to disagree with you about this law you quoted my friend, no law states you should minimize cost thereby abandoning your statutory responsibility for standard service to your client/customer. You are only bringing this out of the company's consideration for productivity which will be selfish if they lag in their required responsible service.
.....
But I also disagree with you simply for the reason that the issues of the need or absence of KYC in casinos, which are fully operational in the legal sphere of regulation by laws or rules from local regulators, allow them to be interpreted with some deviations.  And if a business sees that a permissible deviation from the rule of law, which is not a violation of the law, will reduce its costs, then obviously it will take advantage of it.  The example discussed in this topic of a casino refusing to accept documents may very well be such a case.  I would call this situation in legal regulation “permissible deviation of the rule of law.”  A similar situation occurs in almost all areas of legal regulation.
8  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling with stablecoins, Fiat, or crypto? on: August 22, 2024, 05:08:58 PM
I agree with OP.  Indeed, the use of cryptocurrencies in gambling is now much less than fiat, but this ratio is constantly shifting towards greater use of cryptocurrencies. 
Here we all must take into account the possibilities of non-custodial wallets, when you are actually both the owner of your money and at the same time a banker for this money.  And this combination of possibilities has one obvious advantage: no one will be able to block your money.  But with bank accounts, you are constantly under the threat of such a decision from the banks where your accounts are opened and used.  I see this option of non-custodial wallets for cryptocurrencies as an undeniable advantage compared to regular fiat accounts. 
And here, stablecoins can very well perform the function of your money while playing in a crypto casino.

Both the gambling site and your wallet need to be non-custodial to obtain best results. If you deposit your crypto in a custodial gambling site (otherwise known as centralized), then you can easily expose yourself to KYC or even fraud (if the house decides to run away with the money). For full privacy and complete control of your crypto, decentralization is the way to go. Unfortunately, there aren't many gambling dApps out there. The tech is still in its infancy. Centralized crypto gambling sites are the dominating force of the industry. At least for now.

If you don't care about your privacy or financial sovereignity, use whatever currency you want to gamble. But if you care, choose crypto instead. Just remember to gamble wisely, and there should be nothing to worry about. Wink
That's exactly what you said about playing smart.  This also means choosing cryptocurrencies.  And apparently there is a preference for paying for the game in cryptocurrency rather than in fiat.  In my opinion, cryptocurrency payments in the field of Gambling are just one of the elements of a smart game, but if you weigh the pros and cons of cryptocurrency payments, you begin to understand that cryptocurrency is still preferable for many reasons.
 But a lot has been written about this in this topic.  And a smart player will certainly take all this into account.
9  Economy / Gambling / Re: How will I know I'm playing on a reliable online casino site on: August 22, 2024, 05:01:01 PM
...

I mean, communication between those who gamble on a casino and the casino staff itself has always been considered to be one of the most important aspects / characteristics when comes to knowing how reliable the casino itself is in general, that is why it is perceived as a positive feature. It is even more applicable when the mean of communication is not only the typical social media accounts we already know: like reddit, Twitter/X, Facebook or Instagram, but also this forum. In my experience it is easier to spot when a casino is shady and when it is not, thanks to the kind of meritocracy and healthy community we have here. There is a good reason scammy casinos and bookies are quickly exposed and expelled away from here and that is good for all of us
Yeah.  I completely agree with you that the fraudulent aims of the casino are indeed immediately exposed by experienced gamblers who write a corresponding warning here on the forum.  And if you consider that many forum users very seriously value their rank on the forum and their reputation in the community, which many of them have achieved over the years by communicating with other users of our forum and receiving merit, then it is immediately clear that such authoritative users will almost never misinform others  , write lies or false information about the casino.  So, yes, the quality of studying the topics of a particular casino on the forum provides a lot of truthful and objective information.  Unfortunately, I believe that relatively few new forum users register on the forum now, much less than, for example, in 2017, but I hope that many people simply read the topics about casinos and the Gambling section general without registering.
10  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Luck or Experience on: August 22, 2024, 04:47:57 PM
Everyone can't avoid being greedy. But when you have experienced the bad thing about being it, you'll have to find a way to stop yourself from being one.
Not all are able to avoid it asap. It takes time for someone to control his greed based on the experiences that are gathered throughout someone's experience with bets and emotional being.
Yes, that's right, because greed is a natural trait that humans have, in my opinion anyone will definitely have that trait, depending on how they control it so that something unwanted doesn't happen. This is actually a natural thing, but it will have a bad impact when we can't control it well. For people who have experienced bad things from greed, they should have been able to realize what they can do and what they shouldn't do, because whatever will happen later depends on what we did before. As we know that in this world there is a law of cause and effect, which will always exist and cannot be eliminated. I would question if they always feel the same way, because they must have never learned from the mistakes they made before. In any case, experience can be a valuable lesson, so don't miss it.
It seems to me that greed is a feeling that is very strong in youth.  But as a person grows up and moves towards his old age, this feeling dulls slightly, but in very old people there may well be a recurrence of this feeling.  Old people are simply afraid of losing what they have become accustomed to during their lives.  Sometimes in old people this feeling even goes into the stage of mania.  But for the average middle-aged gambler, I think the greed is still blunted compared to a younger person.  And this is partly due to the fact that a middle-aged person simply already has some savings in life.  He usually already has some kind of real estate, even with a mortgage.  Also valuables and property.  All this also reduces the influence of greed on his life.  By the way, including in gambling.
11  Local / Идеи / Re: [Голосуем] Создаём экосистему мем-токе on: August 22, 2024, 02:24:06 PM
Возник у меня один вопрос по тому, как в проекте формируются киты, условно говоря.
Ну в целом картина по моему  очень хороша и соответствует децентрализации. Вы cами можете посмотреть, вот у первых китов нормальное распределение.
А все кто после 14-го имеют по миллиарду с дропа.
Однако 68 млрд у Julien_Olynpic все таки вызывает вопросы.
Я эту табличку взял сейчас с Диора, не знаю, правильная ли она?
Но вот Julien_Olynpic надо как то эту долю ~ 30% саплая распилить, часть раскидать активистам, а ещё лучше вообще понемногу и по всем, оставить может на маркетинг процентов 10, но 30  вроде многовато будет

1      UQAR...GRjm            68 683 641 322,67
2      UQA-...wFlz            9 909 521 331,76
3      UQBO...gNhY            5 499 949 474,68
4      UQCb...eugY            5 083 596 313,05
5      UQBk...oBeU            5 000 443 754,92
6      UQB6...g-mC            4 105 299 908,63
7      UQB3...Tnjo            3 100 864 859,99
8      UQAm...-129            2 846 685 392,47
9      UQDN...4qn7            2 672 170 234,92
10      UQCc...f9U4            1864 397 154,49
11      UQDI...n9dm            1716 868 569,75
12      UQDX...YBNw         1630 693 844,68
13      UQCn...MsNz         1067 851 320,58
14      UQAa...85ru            1000 227 198
....
92             ...

12  Economy / Gambling / Re: Best Crypto Casinos! on: August 21, 2024, 04:27:19 PM
We can consider gambling as an expensive source of entertainment.

Yes, and that is the reason why the people who enter a casino must be adults, of legal age with a certain maturity and with everything necessary so that they have enough Integrity to accept mistakes, when I say mistakes I am referring to the "losses" that can be had in the casino , that is, not losing control when this happens, because in a minor it can give them depression or they can do something against their life, an adult person has more maturity in every sense, well this is what is Assumed.


I completely agree with you.  I would even add that the older a gambler gets, the more self-control he is endowed with.  Maybe this is simply due to getting used to a series of wins and losses and completely smoothed out emotions about the next result from the game.  Or maybe over the years a philosophical attitude to reality, life and various events in life simply comes, which, as we all understand, can be much more emotional than the experiences or delight of any gambling game.  For example, the wedding of newlyweds is very emotional for them, but the wedding of older people is completely calm, not at all like that of a 20-year-old bride and groom.
13  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: When I'm emotional, I LOSS! on: August 21, 2024, 04:03:54 PM
When we lose our money in gambling, we will not become emotional because we know that losing our money in gambling is the risks of playing gambling.
Somehow, when we lose we get even more emotional. In some cases, when  you are losing your money you are also losing your cool. You get irrational and you lose all logic. You just want to win and that’s understandable but you need to fall back and keep all emotions away from the game.

It's pretty hard to do that, in fact, many of us know that it may be bad and cause consequences, but the temptation is too high. Yet, all is in our hands, and only they decide what to do next.
But a lot depends entirely on your character and psychological characteristics of your personality.  I would also not discount the issue of upbringing and a good understanding of your line of behavior and manner of communication with other people.  Otherwise, sometimes it happens, like in a movie, where two chess players are playing and one loser takes the chessboard and with all his might, so to speak, with all his heart, hits the winner of this game of chess on the head.  This is, of course, an extreme example that cinematographers love, but the meaning of this behavior is clear.  Briefly, this can be described as how the losing chess player simply flared up, could not restrain himself, was completely in the grip of anger, and did not understand well what he was doing.  Well, from the outside, this is certainly worthless behavior.  Not to mention his upbringing and manners.
14  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Luck or Experience on: August 21, 2024, 03:51:09 PM
Gambling will usually dominate that gambling experience, because the more gambling games participated, the more experienced the gambler will be. Because the gambler participates in gambling at his own risk, many gamblers lose their money and become very busy trying to recover it. Gambling is a complete failure to apply this strategy, as it is most damaging to re-enter gambling to ever recover the lost money when symptoms of addiction appear.  So a gambler who has more signs of addiction will always be more likely to lose gambling.

You are right about the fact that in gambling it is almost futile to try to spot addictions and develop a strategy. Most likely, such a thirst for winning back will lead to addiction in the player himself and he will be insane, trying to win back his money. And we all know very well that in a casino it is almost impossible to do this, and it is better to get your money back only through honest work outside the casino.

It's better to learn how to work with your emotions and how to hold them in dire circumstances, good or bad alike, in my opinion.
However, this is good advice, but in practice quite a lot of overly emotional people, becoming gamblers, absolutely cannot curb their feelings and calm their psyche in order to return to a normal state.  Many even have to take sedatives to cope with stressful situations.  By the way, sometimes this happens even if the money lost is not at all critical for the normal life of such a player. 
But it’s just that the resentment over a series of losses gets to your throat so much that you just want to howl and curse at the top of your voice.  And some of the players are really starting to get mad.  It’s good if this happens without unpleasant consequences, but this does not always happen and not with all players.
15  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Is there any fun in losing while gambling on: August 21, 2024, 03:40:16 PM
On the time or moment that you do have that kind of perspective or mindset towards on that gambling sessions then most likely you would really be that losing all in the end of the line.
Losing is never been fun and thats why it would really be making up someone becomes impulsive on the time that they would really be losing up money on the time that they do gamble.
This is really that actually common and something that will really be an inevitable thing on the moment that you do play gambling. If you do hate up on losing money then gambling isnt for you
because this is really that a normal part when you do  gamble so it would really be better that you should really be accepting it out on the time that you do gamble on which losing
is really that just part of the game. Therefore, it would really be having sense that you should be accepting your fate or possible conditions on the moment that you do deal or engage with it.
It seems to me that it is people who are not too worried and upset if they lost their money who become normal gamblers as they gain experience.  Losing is truly an inevitable part of the game, and such people, when they have gained experience, seem to almost not worry at all (but let’s say, they worry very, very little) about losing, but treat it with philosophical calm and restraint.  This is precisely what is a good incentive to continue playing into the next gaming session because the thought still appears in your head that winning is also an inevitable part of the game and it will definitely come even if not this time, then next time.  Indeed, such a day comes and it definitely brings joy and satisfaction and, by the way, the desire to continue playing.

Yeah. We shouldn't charge into action even if the situation may seem bad because the funds that we use should be the ones that we are okay to spend in the first place. Emotions shouldn't carve the roads we walk, not only in gambling but in general too.

.....
That is because they know how to use gambling with right so they will not worried and upset if they lose their money. They know that win and lose is part of playing gambling but they understand that they can lose anytime while winning the games will still difficult. They will not force themselves to continue playing gambling especially when they lose because that can remove their fun from playing gambling. They will becomes more aggressive in playing gambling and that can effect to gets more losses. Besides that, they can have fun in gambling even if they lose because they comes to the casino is because to playing gambling using enough money and will not playing gambling excessively. They want to prevents the will of playing gambling because they realizes that can makes them suffer of their lose.

In this matter, what can be considered interesting is the fact that the emotions of an experienced player, or more precisely, the balance of his grief from losing and joy from winning, constantly shifts towards softer experiences and eventually comes to some harmony of feeling, which can clearly be called positive and bright emotions from  gambling.  But this of course applies to experienced players.  Beginners may just have too strong feelings about losing.  And even more so from a series of losses. 
Sometimes they infuriate such a newcomer so much that not only he, but even close people suffer because he becomes extremely angry and irritable.
16  Economy / Gambling / Re: How will I know I'm playing on a reliable online casino site on: August 21, 2024, 03:29:24 PM
This is definitely perhaps the most optimal approach to ensure that you receive reliable and truthful information about any casino.  It is also worth considering that certain nuances of the operation of casino sites are almost always presented to our forum users briefly and objectively.  And this is important and in any case it saves your time and gives you the necessary information as quickly as possible.

Yeah, brevity is the sister of talent, that's totally true if we are talking about the nuances that can be told in easier words than usual.
By the way, it is the simplicity of the presentation of the material that may well be understandable to the vast majority of users who read such messages on our forum.  So, brevity and clear presentation in posts of the latest news from casino sites allows any user, even a novice in gambling, to quickly keep abreast of the latest events. 
Well, how to use this information in your practical game is up to everyone to decide for themselves.
17  Local / Идеи / Re: [Голосуем] Создаём экосистему мем-токе on: August 21, 2024, 01:52:43 PM
Так надо понимать, что процесс сжигания завершён.
Всего у нас стало быть теперь: 100 000 131 909 091 CHMB.
Это правильно, что никто ничего наминтить теперь не может, эмиссия завершена?
Все игры происходят теперь  с этими 100 млрд токенов?

Судя по всему в пулы мало добавили ликвидности. Надо бы активизировать товарищей 80 учредителей, чтобы хотя бы с десяткой-сотней баксов вписались бы.
Особенно слабые пулы с тоном. А они по моему могут быть в дальнейшем востребованы прежде всего из за большего удобства, так как все комиссии в блокчейне идут чисто в тоне. А с USDT все равно надо тон. Это неудобно и заморочисто, по моему. Хотя и в кошельке Тонкипер можно свапать по простому, но зачем все время платить комиссии.




Вот здесь верная информация https://minter.ton.org/jetton/EQBajWYb-dNy0skElmij1onJjXk_ONCx_N1xBOyTaPaRvQ5r

180,131,909,091 CHAMBY

На диор не надо смотреть там информация может вообще никогда не обновится это ущербный сайт, дидаст такой же. Но пулы работают, а что тикет и лого не отражаются - чтож, это ведь не матик, это тон, тут все криво и косо, но хоть как-то работает. Можно и потерпеть за интеграцию с телеграмом.



Ты забыл про дроп 80 млрд?
Всего 180 131 909 091 CHMB
80 дроп и 100 в рынке

Про ТОН согласен, например на STON.fi что-бы монета была в "белом списке" ликвидность должна быть 10 000 $ в TON


Спасибо, понятно, я и правда забыл про это 80   Smiley
Кстати на Диоре  написано до сих пор 100 000 131 909 091
CHMB. Huh  Я это увидел и принял за правду. Smiley
Триллион, блин, какие то.  Grin

Так все - уже есть  гарантия, что ещё 80 не появится внезапно?
Надо бы по моему транзакции сжигания привести от всех участников, кто участвовал в минте. Это будет правильно и для комьюнити полезно.
18  Local / Идеи / Re: [Голосуем] Создаём экосистему мем-токе on: August 21, 2024, 12:46:18 PM
Так надо понимать, что процесс сжигания завершён.
Всего у нас стало быть теперь: 100 000 131 909 091 CHMB.
Это правильно, что никто ничего наминтить теперь не может, эмиссия завершена?
Все игры происходят теперь  с этими 100 млрд токенов?

Судя по всему в пулы мало добавили ликвидности. Надо бы активизировать товарищей 80 учредителей, чтобы хотя бы с десяткой-сотней баксов вписались бы.
Особенно слабые пулы с тоном. А они по моему могут быть в дальнейшем востребованы прежде всего из за большего удобства, так как все комиссии в блокчейне идут чисто в тоне. А с USDT все равно надо тон. Это неудобно и заморочисто, по моему. Хотя и в кошельке Тонкипер можно свапать по простому, но зачем все время платить комиссии.


19  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling with stablecoins, Fiat, or crypto? on: August 20, 2024, 09:55:58 AM
Many people consider crypto to be their type of investing, so it can be a bit foolish to gamble that away. Unless you are very sure about the origins of your bitcoin, many people can find that their funds are traceable back to an exchange account which probably has your KYC information and may be even doing analysis on how you are spending your money - you might not be as hidden as you think. To me gambling with fiat currency is a bit better actually, because of one of the reasons you mention and that is price stability. I would be disappointed if trading it back out and finding that the 20% I won was swallowed up by a big lurch downwards and there are often additional fees involved at various levels if you want it back into fiat currency.

Of course. It wouldn't make sense to gamble with crypto purchased from a KYC-compliant exchange. You can easily get caught by the government. To achieve true anonymity and privacy, you'd need to acquire crypto in-person, or through a decentralized exchange. Anything that doesn't require you to verify your identity would be fine (no KYC).

I see no reason to gamble privately unless you're living in a country where online gambling is illegal or simply want to avoid paying taxes (which is not recommended). Most people have nothing to hide, so they wouldn't mind about the currency of their choosing. While Fiat is still "King" for gambling, that doesn't mean there is no future for stablecoins/crypto. The latter is just starting to blossom. Just wait a few more years, until the crypto gambling industry becomes a "force to reckon with". Exciting times ahead for gamblers. Cheesy
I agree with OP.  Indeed, the use of cryptocurrencies in gambling is now much less than fiat, but this ratio is constantly shifting towards greater use of cryptocurrencies. 
Here we all must take into account the possibilities of non-custodial wallets, when you are actually both the owner of your money and at the same time a banker for this money.  And this combination of possibilities has one obvious advantage: no one will be able to block your money.  But with bank accounts, you are constantly under the threat of such a decision from the banks where your accounts are opened and used.  I see this option of non-custodial wallets for cryptocurrencies as an undeniable advantage compared to regular fiat accounts. 
And here, stablecoins can very well perform the function of your money while playing in a crypto casino.
20  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: They will find someone to blame for their mistakes on: August 20, 2024, 09:44:29 AM

The head of casino regulatory body should be the one arrested for enabling such bet exist under his watch, his incompetence led to taking advantage of such rare opportunity by the guard who's a real gambler
Every country has gambling laws, and if its provisions allow for gambling on election dates, the regulatory body is not guilty of any crime. If you assume that such an aspect of gambling shouldn't be legal, your option should be to lobby the lawmakers to make laws that will make gambling on political events illegal. For me, the regulatory body deserves to be praised because they did their job perfectly. Their job was to identify gamblers or gambling service providers who break the law and report them to relevant authorities. They did the right thing to arrest and report this suspect to the law enforcement agents.
In my opinion, such control should naturally be included in the documents regulating the activities of the regulator authorized to control gambling in the country.  So, identifying such cases is generally the job of the regulatory body and praising it simply for the performance of its official duties does not make much sense.  This should simply be done constantly and on a regular basis.  It seems that there is nothing to praise the regulator for.  But then the reaction of law enforcement agencies is important, and more specifically, a high-quality investigation, transfer of the case to court with weight and evidence, and appropriate punishment for both the defendants in this case and the officials of the casino itself. 
In my opinion, this is precisely the critical point in this whole story.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 431 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!