WHY HAS IT NOT BEEN FIXED YET?

Why no response. or explanation?

*I’m still banned from posting publicly in the IncaKoin discord channel, for expressing the concerns and issues with the project.

The first of which is the error we get when we try to stake our keys, which have inputs of fifty million coins per transfer(s) or more. I have confirmed with the other users who I am in contact with, that there are billions of coins which cannot be staked, and they as well as myself are steaming mad, and worse by the day. None of us are willing to move the coins and lose our now 14 months of staking weight; if we move them to allow them to stake; by sending smaller input transfers of say ten million. That’s a massive percentage of the network lost from us, to those of you who don’t have the same problem.
I’m guessing is any of you devs had the same problem, it would have been fixed a long time ago. Very convenient for you, not having fallen into such a trap.

If you try to change the code, so as we all lose that staking weight, while allowing yourselves to have staked your coins the whole time. IT’S CRIMINAL FRAUD, and you should be prosecuted directly by the mafia-like human-farming statists as such. Hang em high like dead ducks.

This is the error we get when we try to stake those keys;

ERROR: CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue too high
ERROR: CheckBlock() : CheckTransaction failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
ERROR: IncaKoinMiner : ProcessBlock, block not accepted

Do a google search of this above error, shakezula’s name comes up (Adam McKinney?); IncaKoin, and the “shitcoin”. This is an old bug from before 2014.

I was told many months ago by Bobby (wolfie), that it was easily fixable and would be done right away. Regtable, has also repeatedly told me it was easy to fix. When I ask them privately why it has not been fixed yet. I get no response.

If the bug, only needs one value to be changed, and then recompiled, WHY HAS IT NOT BEEN FIXED YET?
You’ve ruined this project, you’ve derailed all the work I’ve personally put into this coin. You’ve destroyed our investments! The network is in ruin, and the investors/users are pissed.

Is this a matter of mere negligence? Or is it actually a malicious attack, a self destructive action, suicidal impulses being acted out by immature pathological liar con men, is what myself and the other investors want to know.
What the fuck is going on with you people? Have you lost your minds?

The Cryptopia exchange still has the wallet on maintenance, and rightfully so. Until the issues have been sorted out. This bug (which was added intentionally apparently, to speed up the blocks I was told by wolfie and Regtable). What the hell does that even mean?? It’s like dealing with some liar scam artists!

WHY HAS IT NOT BEEN FIXED YET? If it’s only one line of code that needs to be changed and recompiled into a client.

You’ve shattered any trust we had in you.

The other exchanges also have their wallets in maintenance, its been a long time now. They’re all stuck on abandoned illegitimate forks of the chain, a whole other issue to deal with. You thought you could fix the problem by adding a centralized checkpoint server, that didn’t work. Now the coin is truly centralized, into the hands of some unknown irresponsible, derelict controllers who don’t respond and silence those who bring these problems we face into the public.

The presstab block explorer has been down for ages as well. Unpaid and abandoned.

Another block explorer and mining pool I have found.
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Incakoin/

They show a block height of 2,723,883, now 140,000 blocks behind the legitimate chain. Obviously stuck on a bad fork as well. I messaged them, but got no response.

It’s time you put on your big boy pants and get the first of the issues solved, so that we can all help to get things back on track. The first of which is the “txout.nValue too high”.

We appreciate the work Regtable has done recompiling the client with updated libraries, although none of us over here are using it, after we’ve found a virus embedded into one of the earlier clients, which the type is now identifiably by virus scanners, we’re waiting to hear whats happened by the commentary of other users before we try the newish version. 

I suggest you get the first issue fixed immediately, then perhaps we can find a way to take the UTXO data and add it into a fork of a protocol (a coin, not an ico token) which works properly, so we can port over the entire chain into a more updated client system, without all the bugs that have been found within the Bitcoin source code over the years.

Or what’s next???

My NKA client (not the new version being tested), has indeed synchronized.
I did have to delete the directory and start with a backup copy, I would guess to get rid of the erroneous data contained within it from a recessive chain version which split off.
The backup I used this time was a bootstrap labelled "IncaKoin-29-12-2017".

Recently staked some coins, and they worked without the

ERROR: CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue too high
ERROR: CheckBlock() : CheckTransaction failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
ERROR: IncaKoinMiner : ProcessBlock, block not accepted

error
But the chain became immediately split again and I lost synch.
Been trying to get it going again since the new checkpoint was put in, and I added the "good" node.
Didn't work, hung for days. I guess having the split chain in my blocks F'd it up.

So I deleted the directory again, and put an old backup in again.
Its downloading the chain now, will let you know if I'm able to synch it (for those of you still having troubles).

BTW any clues when the

ERROR: CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue too high
ERROR: CheckBlock() : CheckTransaction failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
ERROR: IncaKoinMiner : ProcessBlock, block not accepted

may be fixed?

Be nice to be able to try and do some OTC sales again if every got working again, and Cryptopia or Nova had a working wallet going.

Relayed from the "quiet room" in discord, as I'm still forbidden to post.

GerryMc09/21/2018
Welcome to the quiet room. You know why you were sent here.
October 6, 2018
Daystar10/06/2018
lame lame lamers
October 8, 2018
leNOviotLast Monday at 12:47 AM
:joy:
DaystarLast Monday at 2:12 AM
Yea, gimpy gimps
leNOviotLast Monday at 3:58 AM
:joy: :joy:
October 12, 2018
DaystarYesterday at 6:15 PM
stinky stinkers
October 13, 2018
leNOviotToday at 12:02 AM
Well you shouldn't have been a butthole I guess, right?
DaystarToday at 1:26 AM
What are you talking about?
DaystarToday at 2:58 AM
Ok, so how about you take a look at things from my position for a moment…
I’ve been working on this project since the very beginning.
From that point, I’ve invested about 20 BTC into it, and taken out almost 10 BTC.
Some I’m still in more than10 BTC deep, which is now around $70,000 USD!! (Including the BCH)
The coin is broken. The chain splits. Double spend attacks are possible against exchanges, and they have happened.
No exchanges wallets can now send or receive NKA.
I’ve been busy selling this to people through the years, and then adding the cash back as support levels (for years), gathering more and more NKA.
Now I find, I’ve got what looks like billions of coins which won’t stake, as I get this error,

ERROR: CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue too high
ERROR: CheckBlock() : CheckTransaction failed
ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
ERROR: IncaKoinMiner : ProcessBlock, block not accepted

They’ve got almost a year of built up staking weight. If I move them, I lose a massive percentage of the ownership of the network.

I can barely get a comment back from anyone about this, including bobby, who I’ve spoken to once (in voice) in five years. So I begin to post publicly, and then I’m forbidden to post!
And let me say again. From my perspective, I’m in $70,000 USD deep in this.
I could have just sold and sold, and taken the money and run, but I didn’t.
I doubled down, to keep the support levels afloat, buying BTC and adding it back into exchanges.
Other people who I’ve gotten into this have also put a fair chunk of BTC and LTC into this as cash. They are pissed. I’m pissed too… And I get smiley faces from you, likes its joke!
No solutions on the horizon, and everything is fucked. How do you think I should feel??
Do you think I should post publicly about all this?? Whats next?
leNOviotToday at 9:38 AM
Cryptocurrency is like drugs. Hit or miss. You don't blame the dealer, you blame the idiot buying the drugs.
leNOviotToday at 9:55 AM
And frankly, I don't know diddly about blockchain, transactions, or any of this crap. So you're barking up the wrong tree getting pissy with me, k?
DaystarToday at 12:49 PM
Apparently you are a moron; there is no hit or miss with drugs or crypto, its strictly scientific. Another bad decision by bobby to make you a mod in here. Someone who is clueless about crypto, drugs or being moderator, and likely a lot of other things. The IncaKoin discord room is there to talk about IncaKoin, which is what I’ve done. Bobby get rid of this clown, and pull your head out of your ass. You don’t blame the victim of a robbery for the actions of the robber. I’ve just about had it with all this, and ready to take this to the next level.

@PowerHemp

An example of a large wallet, is one with say
550,000,000 NKA sent in 50,000,000 transfers (inputs), with now nearly 300 days of staking weight.
There are many others...
Wallets, like the largest one with around 1.6 Billion coins (The one that Bobby "donated" years ago to the project), which has lots and lots of about 1,000,000 NKA inputs, which was a ASIC POW mining address, which is obviously an encrypted wallet.dat which he opens once in a while and allows it to stake; those ones seem to work fine with the new adjustments of the protocol.

The 550M wallet (as an example) funds, cannot be moved now, without losing the staking weight, which would constitute a massive loss in ownership of the network, and is terribly unfair to myself and those other investors who I have painstakingly got involved in this project and assured them they could hold those funds and accrue "interest" by staking, and holding the percentage of the network on par with everyone else (as when they bought them), as we are all (of course) should be able to stake at the same rate, or its become a hybrid scam coin. Where the high staking rate now works against them, instead of for them; to the benefit of others who were prepared for the change.

One of those investors (who holds a large key), has told me he wants to break up that key into smaller wallets to try and sell to his friends, although the coin appears to be now approaching death, as Bobby and Jamie seem to of all but abandoned it; he now may not even be able to do that (sell to his friends).

Of course with the splits in the chain, there is no exchange which runs the valid longest chain now, and thus, we have no exchange to even send coins to, in an attempt to sell/exchange them with others.

It has been expressed to me (and I'm starting to believe it now), that the plan could be a malicious one (to my incredible amazement), where by at some point (a year or two from now), the update comes with a reduction of staking percentage, like say 1% every 35 days instead of 9%, and those wallets and fund woulds have lost a massive percentage ownership of the market capitalization of the coin; making it a complete scam coin, and really destroying it for any sane investor.

If this issue is easy to fix, (which I believe it is), why has it not been fixed yet??
The splitting of the chain is much more difficult to fix, but other coins, like our parent project Peercoin, had this very same bug, and it was fixed!

Hey Bobby and Dev(s), get the damn changes made to allow large wallets (keys) to stake again...
It's been a long while now, I can't imagine why you would want to scare away investors like this.
Suicide the coin network?  ... short sighted and irresponsible

All the issues could be fixed and turned around.

You (Bobby) told me it was easy to fix and would be done right away, I relayed that msg to investors.

Along with the other issues we suffer from, this has made it totally impossible to OTC sell to people.
Never mind, the fact there is no way to get NKA in or out of exchanges, and so adding the cash back to support levels as I almost always have, is not going to happen.
That's a whole other issue which will kill this project dead.

I won't be selling any NKA to support the network until the fix is in, then I'll also have a nasty list of terrible things to warn them about if I did so, to sell it in good faith and honourably.

What's your story?
Have you abandoned this project for more profitable ones?
Bobby, Jamie and perhaps Regtable..

PS I'm still banned from posting publicly in the discord channel. That's not going to win you any help or support from me or my group of investors and users (and their friends etc) either.

Make the large wallets (large inputs) to stake fix happen.
Or why not? Should we just let it all rot and die?

https://imgur.com/a/6qnz4PZ

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize" ~Voltaire

@X4, all users and all exchange platforms;

The IncaKoin network and client software has been suffering from a bug for a long while now. The administration/management has been absent in their duty to inform you of the situation, likely for fear of the FUD reaction.

I have now been silenced (banned from writing publicly as of recently) in the discord channel for writing about the issues which I’ve needed to be made public and resolved. The discord channel’s purpose is for dialogue regarding IncaKoin, not for conversations about “Hello gang”, “I’m having nice weather over here” ETC.

The main issue...

Every now and then, the chain splits. Almost always, the chain reorganizes and adds all transactions to the multiple chains, the longest chain is always seen as valid. BUT, every once in a while, it permanently splits. This can cause serious problems for exchanges… (and users).

When this occurs, you will find that you are nearly permanently out of date and unsynchronized. At this point, you are on the wrong chain. You’ll need to remove the data from the IncaKoin directory, and replace it with a backup or bootstrap. Then allow it to redownload the chain from that saved point in time.

Bootstraps are a dangerous habit to allow all the users to become accustomed too. It would be possible (once all the users are trained to add in a bootstrap whenever an issue arises), to created a bogus chain data, with malicious “errors”, stealing coins from addresses etc. This is why you should always make backups of your data directory regularly.

This error in the network will occur until the source of the problem is recoded. Many coins which are of the early generation of altcoins, which were forked from early iterations must have the same errors until they are dealt with.

Apparently I'm forbidden to write in the public areas of the discord channel now.
Here is my response to Regtable.

Thank you for your response Regtable, and in resolving your relationship to the project. I’m sorry to put you through reading that long book, but I had to mention the possible scenario which has been unfolding so that the issue had been seen by others and for a public record; and for those who I’m writing on behalf of, who are watching. Its not bullshittery, paranoid or self centered in the least, I’m looking out my self interests and other participants who I am obligated to try to protect, and all we have is words here. Take no offense by them please.
Its just an attempt to communicate.
Of course if the 9% stake stays the same in future updates, its no problem at all.
Also, I have not been running or using an out of date client. I never have.
We’re looking forward to the fixes, and appreciate your cautiousness with their resolve.

Wolfie has not responded to me in two weeks now and does not even appear in the IncaKoin discord channel although he is online; regtable (who is perhaps the DEV Jamie) doesn't respond either.
On Sep 3rd, Wolfie (the founder) assured me that the staking issue would be resolved “right away”, but now seems he has abandoned the project for some reason; or at least doesn’t respond.

Now to clarify the staking problem myself and other large investors suffer from, is as follows.
Wallet addresses which have received large sums of 50 million coins in several transfers sent to them, will not stake anymore. The log file shows an error of the TX being too high.
Six inputs are now rolled into one output, and with large inputs rolled together, the network refuses to accept the stake.
How large is too large? We have no idea.
Although, over the past five years, we have been able to send a maximum of 99 million coins per send, and they would stake without any problem.
But, several people by my recommendation, have had coins saved for more than six months without staking, and so now those coins are stuck associated to keys which cannot be moved or staked, without losing the accrued staking weight.
In my case, I have several addresses which have 250 days of staking weight. If I were to move those NKA to another address to stake them (after the 35 days), I would lose that increase of +70% the amount of coins as of now.
Although the amount of coins is not really the issue at all, it is a matter of the percentage ownership of the network of which has been invested in.
The large interest rate (or inflation), is really no problem, because no one is “doing it to us”, as we can all stake at the same rate. But now in this case, every day that goes by, the high interest rate (or inflation), works directly against us who have coins in this situation of not staking.

The others who I have helped to create air gapped offline keys on paper wallets and brain wallets, are also in the same situation, and they believe that the administration crew of this project may have very well had a look at the block explorer, found these addresses and decided intentionally to change the protocol to forbid them to stake.
They suggest to me, that they may well have had this plan, to drag this on as long as they can, and then change the protocol again, and perhaps lower the staking rate, there by stealing a large percentage of ownership of the network from myself, and these investors into their own hands, whose keys have many many tiny deposits, created to not be affected by this new unannounced protocol change, and would of course been benefiting with the inflation.

For those of us who have who hold a large portion of the network, after many years of investing (5 years for myself), this is an extremely frustrating situation, and we need this to be resolved and set back to how it has always been for the last 5 years. Only one variable needs to be set back, and this should be extremely quick and easy as a mandatory update.
Why has it not been done yet?

It has been suggested to me a couple of times now by regtable, to just go ahead and move those coins to new addresses, thereby losing the 250 days of staking weight, as if that should even be an option for us over here. Its time to get this problem fixed, as this is an easy one to fix.

The very serious problem, of which I will explain in great detail upon my next letter to you all, is a much more difficult problem to solve. The management of the project, were perfectly happy a year ago, to solve it by creating a new coin, or even a token was suggested; and simply forcing everyone to swap into it, within a very narrow time frame of two weeks or a month (where by those who missed that window would be just shit out of luck). No details of the recipe or the coin protocol were offered. An ERC-20 token, a clone of NXT, or dash, or whatever, nothing was explained, we were just supposed to accept whatever they concocted and send all the coins on the network into their hands, as they handled the swap on third party systems, (either a discord bot, or exchange), as third parties themselves to us, and just and hope trust nothing would happen during that process, and it wasn’t a bait and switch attack, or a number of other possible attack scenarios to hijack the entire network (or from those they wished to plunder), without any possible recourse, but hitmen of one sort or another.

In my next post I will reveal the details of the findings of my investigations over the years of why the IncaKoin network’s blockchain gets “stuck” every six months or a year, and the data directory needs to be removed and replaced with a backup or bootstrap, before that event happened. It will also come to light of how these events have affected our relationship with exchanges, and the difficult situation that has put them in. Yobit, for example. But enough of that bad news for now.

Finally, although it seems I’m being very hard on wolfie and the dev(s), I would like them and everyone else to know that I do and have appreciated all of the fine works and effort they have put into the project over our last five years together. They have faced this very serious problem of which we suffer, and they have done it alone, unable to share the burden for reasons I will disclose in a later post.
Being a proof of work coin, without any premine, or coins given to them from mining (as a form of taxation or robbery/extortion governance), and not being an ICO, whereby the founders just make up whatever price they want, market the project, collect the money, and after the fact don’t really need to do anything but run away and make excuses (as they’ve already collected the money).

Not having any of those sources of funding, has put wolfie (Bobby) in a very difficult and costly situation, likely paying out of his own pocket to get us on exchanges, make changes to the code by hired devs, create the paper wallets forms etc. And so I would understand any potential bitterness he or they may feel watching the ICOs for example, and their apparent free ride, funded by fools and suckers. Depleting the entire crypto space of money like a blackhole, as well as holding the price of BTC and ETH (the mothership of the ICO scams) down, as those investments of the fools and suckers were cashed out.
IncaKoin is a real coin. Its protocols are fraud and scam resistant, provided it is not changed and subverted into a scam situation from within. Lets all make sure that doesn’t happen, for the sake of its investors, the exchanges, and the future success and trust in crypto.

More to come soon...

Posted on the IncaKoin discord channel, on Sep 10th, but was deleted by the moderator.

"After the word has got out that you (Bobby) aka wolfie and the hired DEV team have changed the maximum amount that can be sent in one transfer, to be so low that 50 million coins will not stake at all; they are steaming furiously mad. They agree, that it was certainly not a mistake.They believe you have done this on purpose to steal a percentage ownership of the network from them (and myself). I’ve told them to give you the benefit of the doubt, but they just don’t believe that.

That fix, of a mandatory client update again needs to be put together right away. You obviously know how to do that, and it needs to be done now, and with no other changes made (especially without informing everyone). You’ve really lost people’s trust now, and it won’t be easy to get back. Personally I can’t believe I’ve helped with this project as much as I have now. Given out thousands of fliers, spent hours and hours to help people have an understanding of how all of this works. And promoted it as my own, as a team member and part of a community. We’ve been floating the price since Bitcoin was $100, and Litecoin was $2. Those coins have floated the price up with their rise.

Solve the problem. And then there is the other problem. Which certainly needs to be resolved before any hard fork, forcing clients to accept any chain. My IncaKoin software clients now skip between two chain, one chain synchronizes, then it flips back to obviously another branch which is now 3800 blocks behind. The block explorer shows the chain which updates and synchronizes, but does not show certain wallet addresses, or their associated transactions IDs. They show as orphan blocks. How could this be, when all transactions would normally be propagated and accepted by both chains, if there was a split by accident. It better not be found once the chains have been analyzed by a blockchain investigation team, that you guys have attacked our chain, and the network of people who use it. Its hard for me to believe any of this, as it would be insanely stupid of you to do any of this mentioned above, if you in fact have."

More updates very soon, of what is going on with IncaKoin, and its issues which will need to be resolved to continue a fruitful journey.