I am located in Germany, and I am trying to make sense of how to deal with hardforks.

cointracking.info's recommends * entering duplicated transactions for each "old coin" transaction redenominated in the new coin and with 0 cost basis.

I've understood this as: a transaction of (X BTC bought for Y EUR sold) prior to BCH fork-date requires an additional transaction (X BCH bought for 0 EUR), and similarly (X EUR bought for Y BTC sold) requires an additional transaction (0 EUR bought for Y BCH sold). Is that right?

This makes sense to me in terms of keeping the BTC/BCH balances synchronised, but in the second case I'm not sure it makes sense to express the pre-fork BCH activity in terms of "0 EUR bought".

My generated "Detailed Calculation" / "Auszug aus dem Handel von digitalen Währungen" report contains strange looking transactions such as:

"Verkauf von 0.01 BTG für 0.00000000 IOT bei Bitfinex"

because it's preceeded by a real transaction of 0.01 BTC for some amount of IOT on Bitfinex.

It's just not true that I sold 0.01 BTG for 0 IOT on bitfinex.. Should these kind of "fork transactions" be included in the report at all?

*: https://cointracking.freshdesk.com/en/support/solutions/articles/29000018052-entering-coins-with-a-fork-e-g-btc-and-bch-

Gibt es ein Beispiel "Auszug aus dem Handel von digitalen Wahlen"? Wegen der forks enthält meine viele merkwürdig aussehende Transaktionen wie "Verkauf von 0.01 BTG für 0.00000000 IOT bei Bitfinex". Ich bin überhaupt nicht davon überzeugt, dass die da hingehören?