In the world of computers, a widely accepted norm is not to change anything when the system is up and running. Otherwise this leads to a system failure. A constitutional change is mandatory only when it can't address the problems beforehand. So far, I don't find any with bitcoin. People may jump up and down but it's better to sit this one out. Until bitcoin fails or is subject to an imminent fail, I don't see how the chagnes fit

Forbes has been covering crypto news regularly for quite some time. But that's just another news agency. And usually, people outside of crypto world are very misleading.

DAG are usually faster than blockchain due to its nature, it's a well established fact. However, bitcoin requires rigorous verification process which is completely fail proof. If you want to send huge chunk of money, which option would you prefer, an army convoy or fedex?

Business is all about making profits surviving the competition. Gaining through competition always shows the productivity and development of any product that fight through its time and rivals and still gain profits. This is applicable also for the investors and owners of cryptocurrencies as they put their money on to something and hope for the benefit as the volatility of these coins lerking in the shadow always.

The idea is very simple. If you want your privacy you use these anonymous coins. What you do with those coins completely depends on you.

There's no denying that some of these ICOs are fake. Then there are these with ambitious goal which in reality sounds farcical. Some of these projects are straight out of hard forks and you know at the first glance they are not going to make it. But a few projects are really good and worth investing. Since 2018 is a rough year, along with other these legit ICOs are suffering. Perhaps these audacious figures are their way of attracting people.