 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Hi guys. I found Orvium on a website that publishes ratings from popular experts: https://topexperts.io/ico/orviumThere is a common 5.96/10 score from 18 experts |
|
|
|
On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?
Well, icobench and icoholder seem to be normally rate. But who knows, maybe scam ICOs can buy a good rating there. It's unrealistic to buy ratings on all listings, there are more than 100 of them. And popular projects are analyzed by almost all top experts. It is enough to see one negative report to understand everything. And where to get such a list of experts? |
|
|
|
On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?
Of course, ratings are sold, and on that they earn. It's unrealistic to buy ratings on all listings, there are more than 100 of them. And popular projects are analyzed by almost all top experts. It is enough to see one negative report to understand everything. And where to get such a list of experts? You can use the sites where project scores are collected from all experts. At cryptodiffer, for example, about 20 experts are immediately visible. There is also http://topexperts.io there are more of them, and the functionality there is better. |
|
|
|
|
I chose several promising ICOs. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
|
|
|
|
On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?
Well, icobench and icoholder seem to be normally rate. But who knows, maybe scam ICOs can buy a good rating there. Of course, ratings are sold, and on that they earn It's unrealistic to buy ratings on all listings, there are more than 100 of them. And popular projects are analyzed by almost all top experts. It is enough to see one negative report to understand everything. And where can I get such a list of experts? |
|
|
|
On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?
Of course, ratings are sold, and on that they earn. It's unrealistic to buy ratings on all listings, there are more than 100 of them. And popular projects are analyzed by almost all top experts. It is enough to see one negative report to understand everything. |
|
|
|
How do you differ scam projects? Recently, for every second project, someone writes a "scam". At the same time, a bunch of popular projects like Savedroid collect millions and disappear.
There are a lot of criteria by which you can check scam projects. These are economic factors, the team, code, and more. If you are new to this, you can hardly figure it out right away. So you can choose the project, analyze it, and then compare with reports of famous experts. But there are no guarantees that the report was not made for money. So you should look at reports from different experts and compare their opinions and yours. You can have a table where you will virtually “invest” in projects and then watch roi. In the future, with success, you can start a real investment. You can also see the statistics of project scores for all top experts. For example, it's quite conveniently on http://topexperts.io. If the individual estimates fall out - it's a reason to think. |
|
|
|
|
On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?
|
|
|
|
I chose several promising ICOs on NEO. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
Usually I trust only analysts who write or shoot video on their own, e. g. Oh Hey Matty or Ian Balina. I watched them. But they do a review of a small number of projects, apparently taking the most popular ones. They don’t have most of my chosen projects. As an option, you can read the theme of the project here on bitcointalk. |
|
|
|
Guys, I chose several promising ICOs. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
Usually I trust only analysts who write or shoot video on their own, e. g. Oh Hey Matty or Ian Balina. I watched them. But they do a review of a small number of projects, apparently taking the most popular ones. They don’t have most of my chosen projects. |
|
|
|
How do you differ scam projects? Recently, for every second project, someone writes a "scam". At the same time, a bunch of popular projects like Savedroid collect millions and disappear.
There are a lot of criteria by which you can check scam projects. These are economic factors, the team, code, and more. If you are new to this, you can hardly figure it out right away. So you can choose the project, analyze it, and then compare with reports of famous experts. |
|
|
|
Guys, I chose several promising ICOs. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
You should trust nobody, including your own judgement. The tendency to make mistakes is in our genes. Information. Common sense. Gut. Balls. And last but not least, quit marijuana when trading - and who knows - maybe we'll get lucky.  Thanks) |
|
|
|
|
On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, I chose several promising ICOs. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
|
|
|
|
Hi all. I chose several promising ICOs. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
If you do not take into account the fact that now is not the best time to invest in the ico you need to look at the rating sites and it is desirable that the companies had the presence of a finished product. I understand the situation. What rating sites can you recommend? Usually I trust only analysts who write or shoot video on their own, e. g. Oh Hey Matty or Ian Balina. This analysts also can not be trusted, they obviously take money for paid reviews But this is better than listing websites that stamp scores for dozens of projects a week, half of which are scam. Better, but not enough. It’s ideal to study the project yourself and read all the reports about it. As an option, you can read the theme of the project here on bitcointalk. There are also enough paid reviews and fake accounts here. If it's hard to you to figure out, then you can use aggregators, where you can find scores for all analysts. E. g. http://topexperts.io. |
|
|
|
|
