 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Crypto.com now offers the lowest possible crypto prices - no fees, no markups. Buy crypto at true cost. Details here - https://goo.gl/iSgcc6 |
|
|
|
Our blog has a new home! Stay up to date with news and stories of Crypto.com at blog.crypto.com. Read more here - https://goo.gl/TFjJFL |
|
|
|
Now accepting address details for U.S. card reservations 🇺🇸! Just in time for the holidays🎄☃️❄️🎁🌟 Sign up today and reserve a card - https://bit.ly/2PQSGVy #HappyHolidays |
|
|
|
Crypto.com Updates: We have UP'ed our Wallet Trading and Credit Card Purchase Limits, UP'ed our Cryptos with Automated Withdrawals, and are adding the Card UPgrade Path. Read the full details here: https://goo.gl/R6m1smFinally, automatic withdrawals have been added to the wallet app. Can we order 2 cards under the same name and address? Sorry no, we will only be able to issue one card per person  |
|
|
|
Crypto.com Updates: We have UP'ed our Wallet Trading and Credit Card Purchase Limits, UP'ed our Cryptos with Automated Withdrawals, and are adding the Card UPgrade Path. Read the full details here: https://goo.gl/R6m1sm |
|
|
|
Crypto.com Chain’s CRO Token will be listed on GOPAX Exchange, a leading South Korean exchange. Trading starts 19 Dec! Full details here - https://www.gopax.com/notice/304 |
|
|
|
Crypto.com announces the appointment of Tyson Hackwood to the leadership team as SVP, Head of Global Merchant Acquisition to expand the adoption of Crypto.com Pay, a cryptocurrency payment solution powered by the Crypto.com Chain. Read more here - https://goo.gl/t6vYH2 |
|
|
|
Why did you abandon the old thread and switch to a self-moderated thread? I mean, stopping spam is important, but you don't want to overdo it on the censorship. If people have concerns those should be answered - moving to self-moderation isn't a long-term answer.
And yet it's not about censorship. The company isnt called Monaco. It's called crypto.com. So they deserve a new thread. If it also includes the added bonus of being able to censor those that fud with no real proof then that's even better. Certain members in the last thread were notorious for it. If it wasn't about censorship, at least to some extent, than why go from forum moderation to self-moderation. You could just start a new thread with your new name and updated information, link to the old thread as the starting point, keep forum moderation, and go from there. Anyway, moderation to stop spam is fine, but sometimes you got to ask questions of a project when things aren't going well. Self-moderation means crypto.com can just decide what is ok and what isn't, rather than the forum operator. Hi there, we like to keep things civil and besides, we are now Crypto.com Opinions and feedback are welcome but we do not tolerate profanity, trolling or harassment of any kind. Comments containing the above mentioned will be moderated. |
|
|
|
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE.
CHRISTMAS HAS COME EARLY!!
Use my referral link now to get $100 Free !
Yes $100 is yours FREE when your beautiful shiny new Crypto.com MCO VISA Card arrives in the post!!!
No hidden catches!
Cards are already shipping in Singapore and USA is starting very soon!
JUST USE MY REFERRAL LINK TO DOWNLOAD THE WALLET APP AND REGISTER!
Download the app & sign up, it's super easy.
Use my referral link https://platinum.crypto.com/r/vrcrwxcl37 with my referral code: VRCRWXCL37 to claim your $100 bonus.
 do I have to be your referral, so I can get the card and receive the bonus? does it have to be like that? sucks Hi there, you don't need a referrer to download the app or get the card, what you get is a sign-up bonus (first come first served depending on how many sign up bonuses your referrer has). |
|
|
|
I'm shocked. They probably made 10 cards, and they think that this can be presented as fulfilling conditions. But this is not the fulfillment of conditions, it is a failure. They are obliged to do everything as promised, or this team is unworthy of any trust from the community.
We did not claim that we have fulfilled the conditions. This is still a work in progress, the team is still committed to a global rollout of our cards. |
|
|
|
I think the MCO team (or crypto.com team or whatever) just aren't across how a lot of people think in crypto.
The $26 million in funds they received was to deliver a particular project. Instead of using those funds to deliver that project, they (at least partially) used those funds to develop a different project, and are on-selling this new project CRO tokens, and giving MCO investors a small slice.
I get that they are selling those CRO tokens to develop CRO, but the timing is just awkward when only a handful of people in Singapore have cards. At least wait until a large group of people have cards, before redirecting efforts to a new project using ICO funds.
We know there are lots of thoughts around Crypto.com Chain. Just want to share that the team is committed to a global rollout of our MCO Visa Cards and there are no changes on our roadmap, and as equally important - the MCO token utility remains the same. The Crypto.com Chain will allow Crypto.com Wallet users to pay with any crypto, anywhere, for free. This is groundbreaking and improves the value proposition and usability of Crypto.com products. This is also currently a critically missing piece of infrastructure and is 100% in line with our mission to accelerate the world's transition to cryptocurrency. The team is looking to build something great that will impact the entire industry. We understand the market is not doing well right now, but we don't stop just because the market is down. We will continue to focus and work on shipping cards, improving the app, adding new features; and now building Chain. I know you say that the roadmap is unchanged, but it is probably on about its fourth iteration, so I don't hold much stock in a commitment to stick to a roadmap since the company is so willing to change it! On your point about MCO utility - it only has any utility if you have cards. Right now that is a handful of people in Singapore. I'm sure the Crypto chain could be great - my point is just that the company keeps misreading the community and overstates how close they are to meeting objectives, and then is surprised that people are annoyed (and price MCO at $2 usd). I mean, cards aren't out there in bulk - how did you think the community would react to hear that you're spending funds on a different project instead of what was in your original (and new) roadmap? Reminds me of the asset contract removal debacle from about a year ago. Seriously, if you haven't delivered on your core commitment of cards, then why do you think people are sceptical that you'll deliver Crypto chain that has a 5-10 year delivery horizon by your own estimation? I'd strongly suggest waiting on a meaningful distribution of cards before promoting all the great side projects you've got going on, which are presumably funded by the ICO that was meant to deliver crypto cards. I am not sure if you fully understand this - again our commitment towards MCO remains, Crypto.com Chain is a separate project. There’s more to the MCO token utility than just cards. Please take a look - https://www.reddit.com/r/Crypto_com/comments/9pi4xp/benefits_of_staking_mco_tokens_as_a_reminder/In the latest Q&A, our CEO Kris addressed on the reason why we have to introduce the project now - https://twitter.com/cryptocom/status/1065985645183565824We encourage you to join our community channels for latest updates |
|
|
|
I think the MCO team (or crypto.com team or whatever) just aren't across how a lot of people think in crypto.
The $26 million in funds they received was to deliver a particular project. Instead of using those funds to deliver that project, they (at least partially) used those funds to develop a different project, and are on-selling this new project CRO tokens, and giving MCO investors a small slice.
I get that they are selling those CRO tokens to develop CRO, but the timing is just awkward when only a handful of people in Singapore have cards. At least wait until a large group of people have cards, before redirecting efforts to a new project using ICO funds.
Really? They creating next ICO while didnt deliever first product? If this true, this is pyramid and scam... Is this the same project which you mentioted? They have CRO token symbol, but seems they have another team members... https://icobench.com/ico/cronuscoinHi there, we are not creating the next ICO. Please read the Crypto.com Chain whitepaper to understand more about the project - https://www.crypto.com/images/chain_whitepaper.pdf |
|
|
|
I think the MCO team (or crypto.com team or whatever) just aren't across how a lot of people think in crypto.
The $26 million in funds they received was to deliver a particular project. Instead of using those funds to deliver that project, they (at least partially) used those funds to develop a different project, and are on-selling this new project CRO tokens, and giving MCO investors a small slice.
I get that they are selling those CRO tokens to develop CRO, but the timing is just awkward when only a handful of people in Singapore have cards. At least wait until a large group of people have cards, before redirecting efforts to a new project using ICO funds.
Really? They creating next ICO while didnt deliever first product? If this true, this is pyramid and scam... Is this the same project which you mentioted? They have CRO token symbol, but seems they have another team members... https://icobench.com/ico/cronuscoinI might be wrong but I don't think they will run an ICO for the CRO coins. In the whitepaper, it says secondary distribution only. Yes that is correct, please see whitepaper (page 24 onwards) - https://www.crypto.com/images/chain_whitepaper.pdf |
|
|
|
|
