Sorry for some reason -and there's a very solid reason for I don't have anyone on ignore that I remember-, I had you on ignore...

I can't leave the thread, you see I recently invested in NAUT and I am trying to defend my investment. You see, the reason I invested in NAUT is because I expected BK to find some solid solution to a problem (POS) that every single shit coin out there has solved before launching, every single one. So I figured he would solve it in a snap and since the price had gone down way more than I had ever expected, even in the worst of circumstances, I figured it would be a not too risky investment at these levels.

But enough of my reasons. The project, I feel, should be pole position for upcoming regulation and not very much is needed, in my view, to achieve that status on a solid base, but SOME actions are indeed required. Getting the "help", voluntary or otherwise, of Julian Yap is the solution? It doesn't seem so. The markets don't think so, so how wise is it? Does BK even care at this point? Those are the relevant questions investors should be posting, rather than attacking the messenger...

Oh, wait, that would be in a world of common sense and basic intelligence, sorry for a moment I deluded myself believing I was in such a world... I know much better, though.

I will no longer be addressing posts from the fear monger "Barabbas" who enjoys nothing more than to fuck up unmoderated Bitcoin Talk forum threads which his cancerous talk and false accusations.

He has nothing positive to contribute to society and I feel sorry for him.

It is up to each and every one of you to help build this new world of cryptocurrencies.  You can be a part of the solution.  Consider your role in the ecosystem.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

Thanks,
Julian

"Cheap" and getting cheaper by the minute. You must be experiencing multiple orgasm from such enjoyment...

Mr. Community Manager, your job is to keep the community INFORMED, not to be an IRRESPONSIBLE CHEERLEADER that loses credibility with every cheerleading post and misinform the community and potential new investors, ok? Would you cheer in the same (irresponsible) way other, conventional, investments of Kelly? Of course you would... and you would go to jail for it.

Just because there's no accountability (yet) it doesn't mean you need to throw away your credibility and the most basic ethic rules by hawking what has proven to be a ruin of an investment, for months now. So act freaking responsibly, ok? Regulation is around the corner and you could (and should) be held accountable.