 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
current markecap : 10,508,962 * 0.007 BTC = 7,356.2734 BTC  it would be # 16 rank just now in http://coinmarketcap.com this is a breaking launch !! |
|
|
|
karpeles coin why not?  |
|
|
|
lol sapphire nice concept  |
|
|
|
is this serious? |
|
|
|
Retardée, it is shown into blockchain that it is not doing mixing, laundry or whatever.
This poor guy sent 10000685.379729 from Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H with "anonymi" check, with the aim of an true anonymous tx.
If you have got functional eyes and a medium size brain of standard chimp, you can see that coins are sent directly from "from" address Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to "to" address ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H ; no mixing is done at all.
26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7
Simply this feature does not exist yet, invisibel just ribbed us.
Sounds like that poor guy forgot to make sure the box was checked, because if it was then the coins would only be sent to a mixer, unless there are none available where it'll give the user an error message. I wonder who people will believe, the coin developer and source code, or that one guy who keeps trying to shit up the thread? You could have at least made a new sockpuppet account... Anyway sorry for the absence guys, away visiting family right now, I'll look over everything that's been posted once I get back. Edit: actually johnny I just looked that that link, it looks like he only sent 10.2 coins through the mixer, with the 10000685 coins being sent back to the sender as change. 1/10 made me respond. Edit 2: By the way, I'm offering a 5 million TiPS bounty to whoever can design the best thread starter OP (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=391192) since IMO we need to make it look a bit more professional. Just post it up as a regular reply here. Bounty ends when I get back (monday/tuesday), whoever gets the most votes from people here wins! Colleague, you are in denial  REally I was interested in TIPS, but at first I found an account with 2.5 b. being transferred. Ok, it was an 4chan scam. Next, I have checked out the output of supposed "anonym" tx and according to blockchain, it is not done any mixing or laundering feature at all. tx 26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7 http://chain.fedoraco.in/tx/26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7 transfers 10000675.379729 TIPS from Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H ... where is the mixing here? I have analyzed the source code at github and it seems it is implemented info param and so. RPC methods lacks fully of implementation. Check RPC sendto method: Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{ if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
throw runtime_error(
"sendtoaddress <fedoracoinaddress>[:mixed] <amount> [comment] [comment-to]\n"
"<amount> is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
"coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
+ HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));
string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
bool bMixCoins = false;
if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
{
string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
}
CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
if (!address.IsValid())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");
// Amount
uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);
// Wallet comments
CWalletTx wtx;
if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
wtx.mapValue["to"] = params[3].get_str();
if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");
string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
if (strError != "")
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);
return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}
Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates bMixCoins ... and that is all  REally, invisbel, I am very very disappointed. I did a bit of investment and now I am really disappointed by your delusional and deceptive attitude. I hope this misunderstanding be solved as soon as posible. Regards |
|
|
|
yeah don't publish the code, hazard is a fucking douchebag who will steal your work. FYI Hazard is actually the creator of stablecoin he just hides behind his sock puppet account
I agree to not publish the source code. But please give them detail explanation of how it works. If there is a technical writers out there it would be helpful. Mixing feature cannot be use for trading because there is no proof that you have send it. So what is the main purpose of mixing coin? Laundering money i guess By sending TIPS through Mixing does not violate any laws of any country so it cannot be called laundering. If there is no law to kill other people then it is not Murder. Edit: Mixing did not work? http://chain.fedoraco.in/block/7ba7d05c4443e372ded87fb6fa5e566e020b203129aa03bc8d266f5d34c1220bI can see my address sending to ETiPMiXRLDvEifQgFLjG4Dp44epvP2ja96 There is nothing of mixing feature implemented yet, just info command and a checkbox which does nothing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=471660.msg5215753#msg5215753 I suppose invisibel should to give a good explanation for why he said mixing is working when it is not. It is fully deceptive by invisibel part. Nice trolling. As far as I know the feature is implemented, the code is just not released. Retardée, it is shown into blockchain that it is not doing mixing, laundry or whatever. This poor guy sent 10000685.379729 from Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H with "anonymi" check, with the aim of an true anonymous tx. If you have got functional eyes and a medium size brain of standard chimp, you can see that coins are sent directly from "from" address Ef1iTBw3sceL1FmcN1AT1be2QRCEFeozk8 to "to" address ERRGDnouHgZCGYnahkX6fyEhRKK1LKBp6H ; no mixing is done at all. http://chain.fedoraco.in/tx/26f66790cd8fb01690ac72493008d5467baf0719456d319ac8ebb798df8025d7Simply this feature does not exist yet, invisibel just ribbed us. |
|
|
|
yeah don't publish the code, hazard is a fucking douchebag who will steal your work. FYI Hazard is actually the creator of stablecoin he just hides behind his sock puppet account
I agree to not publish the source code. But please give them detail explanation of how it works. If there is a technical writers out there it would be helpful. Mixing feature cannot be use for trading because there is no proof that you have send it. So what is the main purpose of mixing coin? Laundering money i guess By sending TIPS through Mixing does not violate any laws of any country so it cannot be called laundering. If there is no law to kill other people then it is not Murder. Edit: Mixing did not work? http://chain.fedoraco.in/block/7ba7d05c4443e372ded87fb6fa5e566e020b203129aa03bc8d266f5d34c1220bI can see my address sending to ETiPMiXRLDvEifQgFLjG4Dp44epvP2ja96 There is nothing of mixing feature implemented yet, just info command and a checkbox which does nothing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=471660.msg5215753#msg5215753 I suppose invisibel should to give a good explanation for why he said mixing is working when it is not. It is fully deceptive by invisibel part. |
|
|
|
uhmmmmm .. I have checkout the source and I have not found any sign of properly mixing . It seems like if just the command info had been implemented  Value sendtoaddress(const Array& params, const CRPCContext& ctx, bool fHelp)
{ if (fHelp || params.size() < 2 || params.size() > 4)
throw runtime_error(
"sendtoaddress <fedoracoinaddress>[:mixed] <amount> [comment] [comment-to]\n"
"<amount> is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001\n"
"coins can be mixed by appending :mixed to the destination address, which will conceal the address you sent them from."
+ HelpRequiringPassphrase(ctx));
string strAddress = params[0].get_str();
size_t iSeperator = strAddress.find_last_of(":");
bool bMixCoins = false;
if (iSeperator != std::string::npos)
{
string action = strAddress.substr(iSeperator+1);
strAddress = strAddress.substr(0, iSeperator);
bMixCoins = boost::iequals(action, "mixed");
}
CBitcoinAddress address(strAddress);
if (!address.IsValid())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY, "Invalid FedoraCoin address");
// Amount
uint64 nAmount = AmountFromValue(params[1]);
// Wallet comments
CWalletTx wtx;
if (params.size() > 2 && params[2].type() != null_type && !params[2].get_str().empty())
wtx.mapValue["comment"] = params[2].get_str();
if (params.size() > 3 && params[3].type() != null_type && !params[3].get_str().empty())
wtx.mapValue["to"] = params[3].get_str();
if (ctx.wallet->IsLocked())
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_UNLOCK_NEEDED, "Error: Please enter the wallet passphrase with walletpassphrase first.");
string strError = ctx.wallet->SendMoneyToDestination(address.Get(), nAmount, wtx, bMixCoins);
if (strError != "")
throw JSONRPCError(RPC_WALLET_ERROR, strError);
return wtx.GetHash().GetHex();
}
Lines 598-638 https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/blob/master/src/rpcwallet.cpp#L598-L638If you analize the code, it checks the trailing mixing param, updates bMixCoins ... and that is all It is the same case for all RPC methods, it seems like an mimic stub which displays param info, but lacks of implementation. I suppose it need more work. REally the system not does implement any mixing feature yet. |
|
|
|
so... the price didn't go up...  Mixing system is too absurd and complex to use . People are waiting price go up, not complex node settings , users and related stuff. Because of failed launch , the most probable is a severe correction ... (2.5 b there out, recall) You do not understand the significance of the coin mixer? In that case you are in the wrong coin. If you are trying to day trade tips, forget it. The profits are in the long term potential. When I say long term, I mean weeks / months. But hoping for big profits in hours / days? Good luck with your investment strategy! Sorry if my words have been misunderstood. I think dev iniciative is valuable, but I think there will not be price correlation because most of people are not interested in settings, nodes, users and really they don't mind this feature. It is simple to understand. Besides, there is 2.5 b there out robbed by an scamer (I nerver told he was invisibal or artos) , so it is clear price will not go up.
GTFO already. You are getting boring. Like seriously. I am tired of all those false accusations and constant flow of diarrhoea escaping your mouth. Just leave. NOW. And stop this shitfest.2.5 bil was explained already, and has nothing to do with anything. Fedora is to remain strong and stable- not yours -not even daily, but hourly- trading pumping gazillion percent and then dumping at the expense of other users coin. The fact that price didn't change means without a doubt, that FedoraCoin is not another scam.That's it, swallow this big pill and shut the f*** up. relax, please. I never told about invisibel was an scamer. I just did publicly denounce that it was substracted 2.5 b from an address which begins to mine from block #81. It is perfectly verifiable into the blockchain, i am supported by blockchain in this case. Because of invisibal said that the amount was scammed in 4chan, I belive in his honesty. It is a pefect explanation. Sorry if my words were misunderstanding. |
|
|
|
so... the price didn't go up... Mixing system is too absurd and complex to use . People are waiting price go up, not complex node settings , users and related stuff. Because of failed launch , the most probable is a severe correction ... (2.5 b there out, recall) You do not understand the significance of the coin mixer? In that case you are in the wrong coin. If you are trying to day trade tips, forget it. The profits are in the long term potential. When I say long term, I mean weeks / months. But hoping for big profits in hours / days? Good luck with your investment strategy! Sorry if my words have been misunderstood. I think dev iniciative is valuable, but I think there will not be price correlation because most of people are not interested in settings, nodes, users and really they don't mind this feature. It is simple to understand. Besides, there is 2.5 b there out robbed by an scamer (I nerver told he was invisibal or artos) , so it is clear price will not go up. |
|
|
|
so... the price didn't go up... Mixing system is too absurd and complex to use . People are waiting price go up, not complex node settings , users and related stuff. Because of failed launch , the most probable is a severe correction ... (2.5 b there out, recall) |
|
|
|
hello invisable ...
whats the mixing service ?
It lets you send coins anonymously by using a trusted third party to send them through, I was hoping to launch it tonight but it looks like I might have to delay it yet another day, launching on a Sunday didn't really seem like a smart idea anyway imo
So, you are the creator but an "anonymous", the supposed ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX instaminer, sent a message to 4chan. Nice story !!
I still don't understand what you're talking about, everybody on 4chan is anonymous by default, if you look in the post I linked you though it clearly says the "anonymous" are you, it was just a polite formulation. BTW, Good luck artos, ... sorry, invisbel |
|
|
|
LOL ... but if you relased coin at December 22, 2013, 03:03:12 AM and block #81 with ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX is December 22, 2013, 02:20:51 AM , who belongs to the address= It was released on bitcointalk at 03:03:12 AM, but it was posted on 4chan hours before that. Check the first post for "Original ANN". "it was" posted ... Were not you the creator? ROTFL I don't understand what you're talking about, just go to https://archive.installgentoo.net/g/thread/38958517#p38963394 and see for yourself. You should at least do some research before you try flaming. So, you are the creator but an "anonymous", the supposed ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX instaminer, sent a message to 4chan. Nice story !! |
|
|
|
LOL ... but if you relased coin at December 22, 2013, 03:03:12 AM and block #81 with ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX is December 22, 2013, 02:20:51 AM , who belongs to the address= It was released on bitcointalk at 03:03:12 AM, but it was posted on 4chan hours before that. Check the first post for "Original ANN": "it was" posted ... Were not you the creator? ROTFL |
|
|
|
Block #81 time - 2013-12-22 02:20:51 Block #570 time - 2013-12-22 12:48:49 Release date - December 22, 2013, 03:03:12 AM (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=380466.0) How could it be a premine if it was released on here not even an hour after block #81? Actually, block #125 came around the same time it was released, are you trying to say that the 445 blocks after - which came after it was released here - are part of a premine? How do you premine if its released? It must take a pretty unique set of skills to pull that off..
BTW, it is relatevely easy to see INPUT transactions of ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX was 2548044097.4609 TIP, evaded later.
It matches with massively premined of address ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX in blocks #81 - #570
http://chain.fedoraco.in/chain/FedoraCoin?count=570&hi=570S C A M A L E R T !!!!!!But I am the creator though, good job proving how clueless you are. Then ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX address is yours and you denied it above ... The only premine I did was when I tested to make sure it all worked, which was maybe the first 3 blocks. I'm not even sure if it was the first 3 blocks since I had someone else test with me and mine at the same time, so maybe they own a few blocks from that 3.
Edit: just a reminder guys, I made FedoraCoin in the days (day? maybe a week?) before CoinGen first appeared, I had no idea if it would work and I wasn't sure about how to use testnet, so I mined blocks on the main net instead. I only counted 3 blocks mined before I released it on 4chan, so I only count those blocks as a premine.
To reiterate: ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX is not owned by me
Please, explain why ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX is premined massively here: (just rethorical request  ) http://chain.fedoraco.in/chain/FedoraCoin?hi=500&count=500Any proof that it's mine? I wish it was, because then I wouldn't have to beg for donations to the mixer. If you're actually concerned about a premine it's fine to talk about it, but screaming "PREMINE SCAM SHITCOIN TRASH!" and not listening to anybody isn't going to get us anywhere. LOL ... but if you relased coin at December 22, 2013, 03:03:12 AM and block #81 with ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX is December 22, 2013, 02:20:51 AM , who belongs to the address? It's yours, great piece of liar |
|
|
|
Block #81 time - 2013-12-22 02:20:51 Block #570 time - 2013-12-22 12:48:49 Release date - December 22, 2013, 03:03:12 AM (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=380466.0) How could it be a premine if it was released on here not even an hour after block #81? Actually, block #125 came around the same time it was released, are you trying to say that the 445 blocks after - which came after it was released here - are part of a premine? How do you premine if its released? It must take a pretty unique set of skills to pull that off..
BTW, it is relatevely easy to see INPUT transactions of ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX was 2548044097.4609 TIP, evaded later.
It matches with massively premined of address ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX in blocks #81 - #570
http://chain.fedoraco.in/chain/FedoraCoin?count=570&hi=570S C A M A L E R T !!!!!!But I am the creator though, good job proving how clueless you are. Then ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX address is yours and you denied it above ... And the 3 testing blocks story ... The only premine I did was when I tested to make sure it all worked, which was maybe the first 3 blocks. I'm not even sure if it was the first 3 blocks since I had someone else test with me and mine at the same time, so maybe they own a few blocks from that 3.
Edit: just a reminder guys, I made FedoraCoin in the days (day? maybe a week?) before CoinGen first appeared, I had no idea if it would work and I wasn't sure about how to use testnet, so I mined blocks on the main net instead. I only counted 3 blocks mined before I released it on 4chan, so I only count those blocks as a premine.
To reiterate: ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX is not owned by me
Please, explain why ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX is premined massively here: (just rethorical request ) http://chain.fedoraco.in/chain/FedoraCoin?hi=500&count=500 |
|
|
|
Block #81 time - 2013-12-22 02:20:51 Block #570 time - 2013-12-22 12:48:49 Release date - December 22, 2013, 03:03:12 AM (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=380466.0) How could it be a premine if it was released on here not even an hour after block #81? Actually, block #125 came around the same time it was released, are you trying to say that the 445 blocks after - which came after it was released here - are part of a premine? How do you premine if its released? It must take a pretty unique set of skills to pull that off..
BTW, it is relatevely easy to see INPUT transactions of ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX was 2548044097.4609 TIP, evaded later.
It matches with massively premined of address ES955wEjq33sJyFrRrrkDfw6d4nGH11uxX in blocks #81 - #570
http://chain.fedoraco.in/chain/FedoraCoin?count=570&hi=570S C A M A L E R T !!!!!! |
|
|
|
nice coin added  |
|
|
|
|
