I can't believe that by simply asking how Nem differs from Nxt it caused this reaction. I'm not trolling. I still don't understand how Nem is different from Nxt. I heard that Nem is different because you're translating the code. I don't think that's innovative. I think POI is a flawed concept. I'm not sure what is meant by "different types of node", maybe someone can enlighten me.
The only thing you did by removing me as a stakeholder was to consolidate the currency further. The good thing about Nxt's initial distribution is that at that time hardly anyone was interested and therefore I believe the stakes belong to different people. After the clones started and distribution was meted out simply by an "interested" comment, you had a lot of bitcointalk accounts posting "interested" that are controlled by the same individual. This isn't my biggest concern with Nem, but I don't think it is good.
My main concern is that Nem and Nxt have the exact same stated goal: "The creation of a new economic movement." I full-heartedly support this objective. I do not believe a division of resources best serves this purpose.
I also don't like to see people giving away their Nxt for nothing, which at this time, is what they have done. They have given it away for the promise of something in the future. When I posted "interested", I didn't know that Nem was going to start collecting Nxt and Btc. I think this collection is unethical, because I can't see anything worthy of a dev fund.
I try to be honest and fair in all my dealings. My intent is to strengthen "the new economic movement" not destroy it. I know the true economic movement was started with NXT by BCNext and I will support it to the end. Remember, I am the one that stated, "Do not mistake us as just another cryptocurrency. We are a movement."
Time will prove everything, the NEM will be successful！！！
Show Posts
I will update everyone when I know more 
