 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
That's a Compute 2.0 gpu and I believe that ccminer with fresh algo only supports cards with Compute 3.0 or higher. I might be wrong as there might be a ccminer compiled for Compute 2.0 somewhere out there.
Given that it actually does some work (stratum detected new block, kh/s display, etc.), that does not seem to be the problem. Surely if the problem was compute version, it would crash with something like "illegal instruction". Check this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=670939.msg7737536;topicseen#msg7737536I see. Thanks. No mining for me then it seems. |
|
|
|
That's a Compute 2.0 gpu and I believe that ccminer with fresh algo only supports cards with Compute 3.0 or higher. I might be wrong as there might be a ccminer compiled for Compute 2.0 somewhere out there.
Given that it actually does some work (stratum detected new block, kh/s display, etc.), that does not seem to be the problem. Surely if the problem was compute version, it would crash with something like "illegal instruction". |
|
|
|
My worker is still not recognized as active on suprnova using ccminer. I have -f 256 and ccminer receives work. My sharerate and hashrate are both 0.
Do you have accepted shares ? Check in Your Account/Workers tab if the worker is active there No. Is the miner considered inactive until at least 1 share is accepted? I've been mining for about half an hour with -f 256, I would have expected to have at least one accepted share by now. post your miner command so we can see ./ccminer -a fresh -o stratum+tcp://up.suprnova.cc:7728 -O [username].[workername]:[password] -f 256 With the tokens replaced appropriately. Still nothing after almost 1 hour. What gpu do you have? GTX 570 |
|
|
|
My worker is still not recognized as active on suprnova using ccminer. I have -f 256 and ccminer receives work. My sharerate and hashrate are both 0.
Do you have accepted shares ? Check in Your Account/Workers tab if the worker is active there No. Is the miner considered inactive until at least 1 share is accepted? I've been mining for about half an hour with -f 256, I would have expected to have at least one accepted share by now. post your miner command so we can see ./ccminer -a fresh -o stratum+tcp://up.suprnova.cc:7728 -O [username].[workername]:[password] -f 256 With the tokens replaced appropriately. Still nothing after almost 1 hour. |
|
|
|
My worker is still not recognized as active on suprnova using ccminer. I have -f 256 and ccminer receives work. My sharerate and hashrate are both 0.
Do you have accepted shares ? Check in Your Account/Workers tab if the worker is active there No. Is the miner considered inactive until at least 1 share is accepted? I've been mining for about half an hour with -f 256, I would have expected to have at least one accepted share by now. |
|
|
|
|
My worker is still not recognized as active on suprnova using ccminer. I have -f 256 and ccminer receives work. My sharerate and hashrate are both 0.
|
|
|
|
|
Did someone make a post in the Chinese board(s) yet?
|
|
|
|
What is with the 'official site'? I never have been able to get it to load.
Don't know, but you seem to be the only person with this problem. Are you in the UK? |
|
|
|
Bit Confucius, How many Panda coins are there 1 or 2 ?
There is one that has already hit some shit exchanges and then there's this one.
Can someone shed some light on WTF is going on. lol
There are 5 panda coins. This one is the real one. The others are scams. |
|
|
|
thought swisscex wanted to add this PND on their site...was announced on fb from somebody..now they added PANDA and PAND...its getting so confusing..
i guess many people thinking that the fb page is the panda 2.0?
That would be sad. We better make it more obvious that we're the real pandacoin. Where do we start?That's one tough question. As for me , I consider all pandacoins real  . Just that some are more promising/profitable than others.One could say that some are more... real than others, then?  |
|
|
|
thought swisscex wanted to add this PND on their site...was announced on fb from somebody..now they added PANDA and PAND...its getting so confusing..
i guess many people thinking that the fb page is the panda 2.0?
That would be sad. We better make it more obvious that we're the real pandacoin. Where do we start? |
|
|
|
They dont work yet, they need to be developed. We only have the domain. They work just fine on my end. |
|
|
|
|
