Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
unless we are just getting extremely lucky, i'd say @terk's profitability tweaks are working pretty well...
Terk has always done a good job since the beginning of this project. You just need to be a bit patient. ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
Whats wrong?
Nothing. Read the faq about Immature & Unexchanged coins.
|
|
|
EU Beta Stratum running stable for over 24h now, congrats ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Keep up the great development! Cheers Yeah. That's very good. And moreover atm: USA 2,0% Rejects. Europe 1,2% Rejects. We have the right to complain but we also have the right to celebrate the improvements. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Le seul intérêt de mettre un boitier c'est de pouvoir mettre le rig en outdoor ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Teamviewer is bad to tweak with settings.
I have a Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 Rev.4.0 with Sempron 145 and Gigabyte r9 280x (Rev2.0) too. I managed to get 730kh/s. Unfortunately, I've no Rev1.0 to do the comparison.
|
|
|
That is absolutely not true right now. Celvermining did about 0.007 in the past two days I am with them. Pretty disappointed. I just made my electricity money.
Previously I did 0.0109 on my own mining different coins and trading for BTC. I\t did take about 4 hours a day of my time but it was fun too.
Where are you gettin those stats? If it's the CM website, lol. This guy is giving you an actual report of what he mined. Not what the site said he mined. No, he talks about clevermining. I'm in too with a rig of 1MH to test. The stats reported on CM website are accurate.
|
|
|
That is absolutely not true right now. Celvermining did about 0.007 in the past two days I am with them. Pretty disappointed. I just made my electricity money.
Previously I did 0.0109 on my own mining different coins and trading for BTC. I\t did take about 4 hours a day of my time but it was fun too.
I think you're a little upset but this is wrong. Clevermining past days: February 28, 2014: 0.012434 BTC March 1, 2014: 0.011097 BTC March 2, 2014: 0.009461 BTC March 3, 2014: 0.007927 BTC
|
|
|
Hi I have (2) XFX R9 290X GPUs and I consistently get different (seems consistently different) Hash Rates:
Running: Windows 8.1 - 64 bit, CGMiner 3.5 with these settings:
--scrypt -o stratum+tcp://eu.coinmine.pw:1111 -u UN -p x --thread-concurrency 28500 -I 20 -w 512 --shaders 2048 --lookup-gap 2 --text-only --expiry 1 -s 1 --no-submit-stale --queue 0 --gpu-powertune 20 -g 1 --gpu-engine 936
Hash rates I get (pretty consistent):
GPU0 ~ 710 kH/s GPU1 ~ 860 kH/s
Any suggestions for getting consistent (~860 kH/s) for both GPUs? Any suggestions for improved Hash Rate?
Thank You Jim
Do you get the same result when you switch the 2 cards on the motherboard? Try to know which ram is used on the cards with the Tahiti mem tool.
|
|
|
Quoted from Clevermining.com Error 500 Houston, we have a problem
There's something broken on the server. We've deployed our army of trained monkeys to fix it ASAP. Made me laugh. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
I think we are mining something like DOGE or WDC atm. But today LTC profitability > DOGE > WDC.
|
|
|
Just want to say: "Thank you!". ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ft.imgbox.com%2FNrQNFXxs.jpg&t=663&c=kUw2qp-zhoOoAw)
|
|
|
I know it's a 7970 thread but ... I hold a brilliant Sapphire Vapor-x 7950 (11196-09-40G). Unfortunately, memory that is installed on it is the "SK Hynix H5GQ2H24MFR" which with stock BIOS. I have a poor hashrate (tested a lot of settings, max 510kh/s) and the VRM are hot like hell while the GPU is at 69°C, which is correct. After some reading I came to the conclusion that I needed to recover a modified bios to solve this problem. But, as you certainly know The Stilt closed his thread on litecointalk. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) So I wanted to know if by luck one of you had the stilt bios for this card or a modified bios that can solve the problem. PM me please. Otherwise, good luck with your 7970. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
To change from the previous 50pages which speaks of "new server" and "high reject" and as I know there are a lot of ppl on this thread I would like to know if anyone can save my life. Tips for sure ... I hold a brilliant Sapphire Vapor-x 7950 (11196-09-40G). Unfortunately, memory that is installed on it is the "SK Hynix H5GQ2H24MFR" which sucks with stock BIOS. I have a poor hashrate (tested a lot of settings) and the VRM are hot like hell while the GPU is at 69°C, which is correct. After some reading I came to the conclusion that I needed to recover a modified bios to solve this problem. But, as you certainly know The Stilt closed his thread on litecointalk. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) So I wanted to know if by luck one of you had the stilt bios for this card or a modified bios that can solve the problem. PM me please. Otherwise, good luck Trek for the establishment of the Asian and European servers. Keep the good work on.
|
|
|
Did i got i right?
expiry, queue, scantime we need to delete from config file/not need them at all?
Delete expiry and scantime and set --queue 1 just to be sure. This settings are provided by Kalroth! Yes and it works. I had found some settings to lower my reject ratio... But finaly the best thing i've done , it's simply remove scantime and expiry, queue was already set at 1.
|
|
|
0.013btc/day per MH/s
^ Exactly What else matters? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Ffeb.imghost.us%2FJPGX.png&t=663&c=KBk1oKi8vj-PIg) I'm joking ... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Website is offline, error 522.
Same here. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
I'm working on EU and Asia servers to launch and split the load. Current server is overloaded with all the traffic/hashpower it got. Stay tuned!I do wish Terk would take down that announcement that the Rejects issue is resolved. It clearly is not!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
7 GIGS go CM! the real question is... will it go OVER 9000 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) There are a lot of complaints but CM growth 2GH/day. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ATM 8,7GH, 9GH soooooooon. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
I don't know if my post will help but ... I am located in Europe, specifically in France. And yesterday before the server update, I had around 20% of rejects, since the update things are alot better. ATM i've got one 1,120kh/s rig, so almost 1,1MH, perfect beta-test rig. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.noelshack.com%2Ffichiers%2F2014%2F08%2F1392885690-clevermining.png&t=663&c=C6P5ceoTz_c5Pg) You can clearly see the difference between before 16:00pm (GMT+1) and after. I've totally normal reject ratio, so it's possible to join and make profits with this pool even if you're european. In this rig i've two card: one r9 280x with intensity of 13 and one 5870 with I=17. Finally, i would like to thank Terk who did an outstanding job, is aware of the priorities and help us to make good profits.
|
|
|
|