 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
I had the same problem with my nvidia cards
rtx 2060 gtx 1080 gtx 1060 gtx 1660 ti after more than 2 weeks I was relentlessly I had to completely reduce the oc
rtx has minimum tdp core clock -502 and memory +500
same for the 1660 ti tdp minimum core clock -502 and memory +600
gtx 1080 minimum tdp core clock +100 and memory 200
gtx 1060 tdp minimum core clock 75 memoir 200
|
|
|
|
1 hour in and wow, switching from claymore to phoenix was a breeze. Almost a copy and paste affair. I mean, gotta setup your powershell:startup and paste in some new info but it was super simple and so far, looking good.
I would've never switched but, for whatever reasons, the devs behind claymore must not have written working miner for the DAG increase the other morning(it was a day ago i think).
Just wanted to say thanks
*Rig is running 1 rx580 8g and 7 1060 6Gb cards at a solid 185mH. The 1060s have all been going for 3 years straight by the way. Hardly any failures since i switched to using a rack server type 12v supply. Also, they're $25! super efficient and very very powerful
hello can you give me your oc parameters for 1060 6Gb tdp cclok mclok thank you No problem.I use Afterburner. Currently my zotac 1060 6gb cards are : Power: 65 CPU: 55 Memory: 800 Yes thanks I have p0 activate and -starps 1 active and I run at 24 mh / s tdp 55 cclk 75 memory 280 + - 40 hour validation There are a couple cards that can't do 800 memory OC. so a couple are, around 650. I used to have 8 total 1060s, all identical and for a couple years they could handle 850 mem stable. I keep a box fan on my rig, on low, barely draws any power. Keeps my hottest card below 61. Most are 55 to 57. Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
1 hour in and wow, switching from claymore to phoenix was a breeze. Almost a copy and paste affair. I mean, gotta setup your powershell:startup and paste in some new info but it was super simple and so far, looking good.
I would've never switched but, for whatever reasons, the devs behind claymore must not have written working miner for the DAG increase the other morning(it was a day ago i think).
Just wanted to say thanks
*Rig is running 1 rx580 8g and 7 1060 6Gb cards at a solid 185mH. The 1060s have all been going for 3 years straight by the way. Hardly any failures since i switched to using a rack server type 12v supply. Also, they're $25! super efficient and very very powerful
hello can you give me your oc parameters for 1060 6Gb tdp cclok mclok thank you |
|
|
|
|
dear me the nmvl.dll is here C: \ Windows \ System32 \ DriverStore \ FileRepository \ nv_dispi.inf_amd64_8dccece3a1276290
new driver 460.89
does not work either and most of the other miners also
|
|
|
|
|
i have exactly the same thing no nvml.dll in system 32. i have driver 356.71
I uninstall with dudu and deactivate antivirus but no dll
maybe this dll comes with the new drivers
I downloaded the dll and I put it in the system 32 folder on veras but I keep the drivert 456.71
better performance for my rtx 2060 and gtx 1060 and 1660 ti in 6go
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: NBMiner v33.6, GPU Miner for ETH, CFX, RVN, GRIN, BEAM, AE, BTM, SERO, HNS, BFC.
|
on: November 29, 2020, 10:11:53 AM
|
|
hello on octopus my 1060 6go
benchmark 5 mh / s
dagger 21.500 mh / s
octopus has problems with the 1060 6go?
my other 1060 ti 6go card and rtx no problem
nbminer 34.1
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the hard work.
5.2e shares still invalid 4.5% (only) on Nicehash!
2020.11.23:15:09:40.431: main GPU0: GeForce RTX 2060 (pcie 1), CUDA cap. 7.5, 6 GB VRAM, 30 CUs
2020.11.23:15:09:40.431: main GPU1: GeForce RTX 2060 (pcie 2), CUDA cap. 7.5, 6 GB VRAM, 30 CUs
2020.11.23:15:09:40.431: main GPU2: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (pcie 4), CUDA cap. 6.1, 6 GB VRAM, 10 CUs
2020.11.23:15:09:40.431: main GPU3: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (pcie 6), CUDA cap. 7.5, 6 GB VRAM, 24 CUs
2020.11.23:20:35:59.183: main *** 5:26 *** 11/23 20:35 **************************************
2020.11.23:20:35:59.183: main Eth: Mining ETH on daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353 for 5:26
2020.11.23:20:35:59.183: main Eth: Accepted shares 1069 (0 stales), rejected shares 39 (1 stales)
2020.11.23:20:35:59.183: main Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.09%
2020.11.23:20:35:59.183: main Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 4105.5 GH (!)
2020.11.23:20:35:59.183: main Eth: Average speed (5 min): 111.862 MH/s
2020.11.23:20:35:59.183: main Eth: Effective speed: 113.61 MH/s; at pool: 109.73 MH/s
2020.11.23:20:36:02.460: eths Eth: New job #d6707f67 from daggerhashimoto.eu.nicehash.com:3353; diff: 1932MH
2020.11.23:20:36:02.842: main GPU0: 43C 53% 113W, GPU1: 65C 78% 126W, GPU2: 47C 57% 83W, GPU3: 39C 49% 78W
|
|
|
|
|
I have the same problem 2 card it did not work at startup and I have to play with the card, it starts up. I think its a bad rayzer or must contat in the rayzer connection
|
|
|
|
Im using 5.2d in hiveos for mining etc....im still at 20.20 with my 5700 cards, need to update to 20.30 soon what i recognized is a higher power consumption. reported in software and also measured out of the wall. i have the same or slightly less mhash. could you pls optimize 5.2d the same way than 5.1c? for me there is no reason to consume more watt if i dont get more mhash  thx indeed it consumes more energy than 5.2 c |
|
|
|
|
Don't download the above, it's a malware!
|
|
|
|
hello can you please implement XNSUB because the twink disconnects from the server the disconnection rate is 80% thank you (nicehash) TTminer does not support XNSUB. This means that the miner gets disconnected from our server when it is moved from one order to another. XNSUB basically allows the miner to be constantly connected to NiceHash, without dropping the connection. This is a ttminer issue and must be implemented by ttminer devs. https://www.nicehash.com/blog/post/what-is-extranonce-subscribe-extension-xnsubWhat is extranonce subscribe extension (XNSUB)? In this short guide, we will get a bit more technical. We will explain what extranonce subscribe extension (XNSUB) is and why it is important for a miner software to support it on NiceHash. You can find an extranonce subscribe extension specifications here. Extranonce subscribe extension was developed by NiceHash back in 2016. NiceHash moves miners from one order to another to make sure miners are mining for the highest paying order. Because orders send hash-power to different pools, they have jobs with different extranonce1 as other orders. Extranonce1 is exchanged during the miner subscribe/authorize process. For the new extranoce1 exchange, this process needs to be reinitiated. This requires a miner to re-establish the connection. Once a miner reconnects, it is placed on the highest paying order and receives new extranonce1 during the subscribe/authorize process. This causes a few seconds of unnecessary downtime between each order to order move. You can imagine moving miners from order to order is like moving your miner from one pool to another. The miner needs to disconnect from the first pool and then reconnect on the second pool which has a different extranonce1 value than the previous one. If the miner supports the XNSUB extension, the miner does not have to reconnect. NiceHash sends new extranonce1 value, and the miner continues to mine as nothing has happened. In other words, XNSUB is lowering the downtime of the miner. Most modern 3rd party software miners support XNSUB, including Claymore, Phoenix Miner, NBminer, |
|
|
|
|
gminer does not work with latest driver 356.38 from nvidia
nicehash
|
|
|
|
|
thank you
I don't understand why they are accepted but block
|
|
|
|
|
hello the number of validated actions does not correspond to the totality of validated actions
problem or bug
11:26:22 All: 47.98 MH/s [A307:R0 0.0%] 346 W 138.68 kH/W uptime: 01:19:00 last: 0:09
11:26:37 GPU[00]: 16.59 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 51C 90% 130 W 127.67 kH/W last: 0:24
11:26:37 GPU[01]: 17.08 MH/s [A116:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 73C 95% 125 W 136.68 kH/W last: 0:32
11:26:37 GPU[02]: 14.35 MH/s [A89:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 159.50 kH/W last: 0:53
11:26:37 All: 48.03 MH/s [A307:R0 0.0%] 345 W 139.24 kH/W uptime: 01:19:15 last: 0:24
11:26:48 GPU[D01]: Found solution #117, diff = 4.604 GH
11:26:48 GPU[D01]: Accepted #117, RT in 19 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:26:52 GPU[00]: 16.63 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 131 W 126.97 kH/W last: 0:39
11:26:52 GPU[01]: 17.08 MH/s [A117:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 74C 95% 124 W 137.78 kH/W last: 0:03
11:26:52 GPU[02]: 14.37 MH/s [A89:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 159.70 kH/W last: 1:08
11:26:52 All: 48.09 MH/s [A308:R0 0.0%] 345 W 139.39 kH/W uptime: 01:19:30 last: 0:03
11:26:55 GPU[D01]: Found solution #118, diff = 71.58 GH
11:26:55 GPU[D01]: Accepted #118, RT in 18 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:27:03 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d6787f2
11:27:03 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285539
11:27:03 Miner: GPU[02]: Modify Algo
11:27:03 Miner: GPU[00]: Modify Algo
11:27:03 Miner: GPU[01]: Modify Algo
11:27:07 GPU[00]: 16.61 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 132 W 125.87 kH/W last: 0:54
11:27:07 GPU[01]: 17.08 MH/s [A118:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 74C 95% 125 W 136.68 kH/W last: 0:11
11:27:07 GPU[02]: 14.37 MH/s [A89:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.665 GHz 47C 84% 91 W 157.95 kH/W last: 1:23
11:27:07 All: 48.07 MH/s [A309:R0 0.0%] 348 W 138.14 kH/W uptime: 01:19:45 last: 0:11
11:27:22 GPU[00]: 16.61 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 132 W 125.87 kH/W last: 1:09
11:27:22 GPU[01]: 17.06 MH/s [A118:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 73C 95% 125 W 136.54 kH/W last: 0:26
11:27:22 GPU[02]: 14.35 MH/s [A89:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 82% 91 W 157.75 kH/W last: 1:38
11:27:22 All: 48.03 MH/s [A309:R0 0.0%] 348 W 138.04 kH/W uptime: 01:20:00 last: 0:26
11:27:24 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d67e4bc
11:27:24 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285540
11:27:28 GPU[D02]: Found solution #92, diff = 1.888 GH
11:27:28 GPU[D02]: Accepted #92, RT in 20 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:27:37 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d683882
11:27:37 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285541
11:27:37 GPU[00]: 16.56 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 131 W 126.42 kH/W last: 1:24
11:27:37 GPU[01]: 17.04 MH/s [A118:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 74C 96% 124 W 137.49 kH/W last: 0:41
11:27:37 GPU[02]: 14.33 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 159.30 kH/W last: 0:08
11:27:37 All: 47.94 MH/s [A310:R0 0.0%] 345 W 138.97 kH/W uptime: 01:20:15 last: 0:08
11:27:44 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d689045
11:27:44 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285542
11:27:44 Miner: GPU[02]: Modify Algo
11:27:44 Miner: GPU[00]: Modify Algo
11:27:44 Miner: GPU[01]: Modify Algo
11:27:52 GPU[00]: 16.50 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.650 GHz 51C 90% 134 W 123.18 kH/W last: 1:39
11:27:52 GPU[01]: 17.04 MH/s [A118:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 73C 95% 124 W 137.49 kH/W last: 0:56
11:27:52 GPU[02]: 14.31 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 159.10 kH/W last: 0:23
11:27:52 All: 47.87 MH/s [A310:R0 0.0%] 348 W 137.57 kH/W uptime: 01:20:30 last: 0:23
11:28:02 GPU[D01]: Found solution #119, diff = 2.918 GH
11:28:02 GPU[D01]: Accepted #119, RT in 17 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:28:07 GPU[00]: 16.41 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.620 GHz 51C 90% 133 W 123.43 kH/W last: 1:54
11:28:07 GPU[01]: 17.01 MH/s [A119:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 74C 95% 125 W 136.10 kH/W last: 0:04
11:28:07 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.90 kH/W last: 0:38
11:28:07 All: 47.73 MH/s [A311:R0 0.0%] 348 W 137.15 kH/W uptime: 01:20:45 last: 0:04
11:28:22 GPU[00]: 16.38 MH/s [A102:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 132 W 124.09 kH/W last: 2:09
11:28:22 GPU[01]: 17.01 MH/s [A119:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.620 GHz 73C 95% 124 W 137.20 kH/W last: 0:19
11:28:22 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.90 kH/W last: 0:53
11:28:22 All: 47.69 MH/s [A311:R0 0.0%] 346 W 137.84 kH/W uptime: 01:21:00 last: 0:19
11:28:22 GPU[D00]: Found solution #104, diff = 4.392 GH
11:28:22 GPU[D00]: Accepted #104, RT in 36 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:28:37 GPU[00]: 16.32 MH/s [A103:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.620 GHz 51C 90% 133 W 122.75 kH/W last: 0:14[/font]
11:28:37 GPU[01]: 16.99 MH/s [A119:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 73C 95% 123 W 138.17 kH/W last: 0:34
11:28:37 GPU[02]: 14.28 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 84% 91 W 156.95 kH/W last: 1:08
11:28:37 All: 47.60 MH/s [A312:R0 0.0%] 347 W 137.18 kH/W uptime: 01:21:15 last: 0:14
11:28:52 GPU[00]: 16.25 MH/s [A103:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 133 W 122.20 kH/W last: 0:29
11:28:52 GPU[01]: 16.99 MH/s [A119:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 74C 96% 124 W 137.05 kH/W last: 0:49
11:28:52 GPU[02]: 14.28 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.70 kH/W last: 1:23
11:28:52 All: 47.53 MH/s [A312:R0 0.0%] 347 W 136.97 kH/W uptime: 01:21:30 last: 0:29
11:29:07 GPU[00]: 16.23 MH/s [A103:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 134 W 121.16 kH/W last: 0:44
11:29:07 GPU[01]: 16.97 MH/s [A119:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 73C 96% 126 W 134.73 kH/W last: 1:04
11:29:07 GPU[02]: 14.28 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.70 kH/W last: 1:38
11:29:07 All: 47.49 MH/s [A312:R0 0.0%] 350 W 135.70 kH/W uptime: 01:21:45 last: 0:44
11:29:22 GPU[00]: 16.21 MH/s [A103:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.575 GHz 51C 90% 134 W 121.02 kH/W last: 0:59
11:29:22 GPU[01]: 16.99 MH/s [A119:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 73C 95% 124 W 137.05 kH/W last: 1:19
11:29:22 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.90 kH/W last: 1:53
11:29:22 All: 47.51 MH/s [A312:R0 0.0%] 348 W 136.53 kH/W uptime: 01:22:00 last: 0:59
11:29:35 GPU[D00]: Found solution #105, diff = 1.130 GH
11:29:35 GPU[D00]: Accepted #105, RT in 21 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:29:37 GPU[00]: 16.25 MH/s [A104:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 51C 90% 133 W 122.20 kH/W last: 0:01
11:29:37 GPU[01]: 16.99 MH/s [A119:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 73C 95% 123 W 138.17 kH/W last: 1:34
11:29:37 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 84% 89 W 160.68 kH/W last: 2:08
11:29:37 All: 47.55 MH/s [A313:R0 0.0%] 345 W 137.82 kH/W uptime: 01:22:15 last: 0:01
11:29:40 GPU[D00]: Found solution #106, diff = 4.001 GH
11:29:40 GPU[D00]: Accepted #106, RT in 18 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:29:44 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d692ae9
11:29:44 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285543
11:29:46 GPU[D00]: Found solution #107, diff = 1.414 GH
11:29:46 GPU[D00]: Accepted #107, RT in 19 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:29:50 GPU[D01]: Found solution #120, diff = 1.574 GH
11:29:50 GPU[D01]: Accepted #120, RT in 18 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:29:52 GPU[00]: 16.29 MH/s [A106:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 51C 90% 133 W 122.48 kH/W last: 0:05
11:29:52 GPU[01]: 17.01 MH/s [A120:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 74C 96% 125 W 136.10 kH/W last: 0:01
11:29:52 GPU[02]: 14.31 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 159.10 kH/W last: 2:23
11:29:52 All: 47.62 MH/s [A316:R0 0.0%] 348 W 136.84 kH/W uptime: 01:22:30 last: 0:01
11:30:02 GPU[D00]: Found solution #108, diff = 1.966 GH
11:30:02 GPU[D00]: Accepted #108, RT in 25 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:30:05 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d6984d2
11:30:05 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285544
11:30:07 GPU[00]: 16.32 MH/s [A107:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.575 GHz 51C 90% 133 W 122.75 kH/W last: 0:04
11:30:07 GPU[01]: 16.99 MH/s [A120:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 74C 96% 124 W 137.05 kH/W last: 0:16
11:30:07 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.90 kH/W last: 2:38
11:30:07 All: 47.62 MH/s [A317:R0 0.0%] 347 W 137.24 kH/W uptime: 01:22:45 last: 0:04
11:30:19 GPU[D00]: Found solution #109, diff = 2.187 GH
11:30:19 GPU[D00]: Accepted #109, RT in 19 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:30:22 GPU[00]: 16.34 MH/s [A108:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.575 GHz 51C 90% 133 W 122.88 kH/W last: 0:02
11:30:22 GPU[01]: 16.99 MH/s [A120:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 73C 96% 123 W 138.17 kH/W last: 0:31
11:30:22 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.90 kH/W last: 2:53
11:30:22 All: 47.64 MH/s [A318:R0 0.0%] 346 W 137.69 kH/W uptime: 01:23:00 last: 0:02
11:30:31 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d69dced
11:30:31 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285545
11:30:31 Miner: GPU[02]: Modify Algo
11:30:31 Miner: GPU[00]: Modify Algo
11:30:31 Miner: GPU[01]: Modify Algo
11:30:37 GPU[00]: 16.32 MH/s [A108:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 51C 90% 134 W 121.83 kH/W last: 0:17
11:30:37 GPU[01]: 16.99 MH/s [A120:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.605 GHz 73C 95% 124 W 137.05 kH/W last: 0:46
11:30:37 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.695 GHz 47C 82% 90 W 158.90 kH/W last: 3:08
11:30:37 All: 47.62 MH/s [A318:R0 0.0%] 348 W 136.84 kH/W uptime: 01:23:15 last: 0:17
11:30:52 GPU[00]: 16.32 MH/s [A108:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.575 GHz 51C 90% 132 W 123.68 kH/W last: 0:32
11:30:52 GPU[01]: 16.97 MH/s [A120:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 74C 95% 124 W 136.91 kH/W last: 1:01
11:30:52 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A90:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.680 GHz 47C 84% 90 W 158.90 kH/W last: 3:23
11:30:52 All: 47.60 MH/s [A318:R0 0.0%] 346 W 137.58 kH/W uptime: 01:23:30 last: 0:32
11:30:52 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d6a347d
11:30:52 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285546
11:30:56 Pool[D0]: Received new job#: d6a6168
11:30:56 Pool[D0]: Working on Block#: 1285547
11:31:02 GPU[D02]: Found solution #93, diff = 4.779 GH
11:31:02 GPU[D02]: Accepted #93, RT in 19 ms. [kawpow.eu.nicehash.com:3385]
11:31:07 GPU[00]: 16.34 MH/s [A108:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.560 GHz 51C 90% 132 W 123.82 kH/W last: 0:47
11:31:07 GPU[01]: 16.97 MH/s [A120:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.590 GHz 74C 96% 125 W 135.81 kH/W last: 1:16
11:31:07 GPU[02]: 14.30 MH/s [A91:R0 0.0%] CClk:1.665 GHz 46C 84% 91 W 157.15 kH/W last: 0:04
11:31:07 All: 47.62 MH/s [A319:R0 0.0%] 348 W 136.84 kH/W uptime: 01:23:45 last: 0:04
|
|
|
|
thank you, the main thing is that the miner works  |
|
|
|
|
Hello
I am very happy with version 5.03
I just have a question the time is not just 2 hours less
how to set the right time please i'm on the nicehash miner thank you
dear me it's 10 h am and on the minor 8 h am
|
|
|
|
I just tested it works well but it has a load on the processor of 15%
driver 446.14
2xrtx 2060
1x gtx 1060
kawpow
That sounds not correct. Can you give me details of your cpu/memory please? i79700k memory 16go 3600 |
|
|
|
|
I just tested it works well but it has a load on the processor of 15%
driver 446.14
2xrtx 2060
1x gtx 1060
kawpow
|
|
|
|
|
