 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi,
I want to talk about anonymousity of dev teams.
what do you think, why they do that?
Wouldn't it be more trustful, if you show your head?
Or do you think they are afraid of being killed?
We prefer to be judged not by our identity but rather of the content of our programming  |
|
|
|
We may be willing to develop your currency, shoot us a PM with some more details  - The CoinDev.io Team |
|
|
|
|
We may be interested in developing your idea for you.
- The CoinDev.io Team
|
|
|
|
|
We are interested in aiding the development of this currency.
- The CoinDev.io Team
|
|
|
|
For a coin to interest me, it'd have to offer some functionality over existing coins. Memes, names, logos are really meaningless. As for a premine, how about try no premine at all?
Functionality would either be in the code or how the coin is used or mined.
A random example -- someone just released a movie coin, and the whole selling point is it will be used for movie related projects. And that is complete nonsense. Any coin would work for such a purpose.
If instead they released it, said it was POS, and rewards were actual online movie rentals through a well known company (vudo, mgo, anyone who won't go out of business next month)... then it'd be unique and interesting and actually serve some purpose.
Huntercoin is another example of something unique. If a coin had a better game for mining, it could do very decently. Chesscoin would be nice and something I expect a lot of people would find interesting.
If you plan to just make a clone coin, using an automated coin maker thingy... there is no way to make it something that the community would actually want.
So I see you recommend an innovative coin incorporating POS that has long term functionality. About the premine however, how could the coin be marketed with no funds? Just my take on the matter - from what I've seen there is a point of diminishing terms regarding premines.... too little and it has no effect, too much and people will avoid it. General rule is to stick with around the amount of coins that will be generated within the first day. - The CoinDev.io Team |
|
|
|
If you need help regarding the development we'd be willing to help. Send me a message / email if you need me.
(Or more directly, join us on IRC #coindev.io)
- The CoinDev.io Team
Thank you for your willingness to help. We will need all the help we can get and would appreciate you joining the team. Please PM me what you could offer the coin and post any suggestions We could help you develop your currency, we support most algorithms out there and will work with you to get what you want. As we are just starting out we will charge you zero fees for development and actively support you. We can also host nodes and pools when you wish to launch. - The CoinDev.io Team |
|
|
|
|
If you need help regarding the development we'd be willing to help. Send me a message / email if you need me.
(Or more directly, join us on IRC #coindev.io @freenode)
- The CoinDev.io Team
|
|
|
|
I really really hope you manage this coin properly. It would be painfully ironic if this coin were to be the victim of a scamster. Just be smart and don't give any BTC to anyone you do not trust. If there does end up being BTC involved then it must ONLY be in the hands of a well trusted escrower on the forum. No exception.
I am all for finding a very trusted holder to control the premine and be basically connected to the official development. Candidates? Maybe we can vote on who gets to do it. An escrow for the premine and transparent operations would be useful as well. Somebody who has earned trust here would be preferable, somebody who has a history of good trades, etc. - The CoinDev.io Team |
|
|
|
|
+1 For Pheonix Wright Coin
- The CoinDev.io Team
|
|
|
|
Here is a list of transactions to the Stack-Coin's address Blockchain.InfoIf the senders could sign messages to verify that they got scammed it would make everything concrete. |
|
|
|
Lets not forget that the creators of the StackCoin scam could be posting here or or trying to ¨help¨ in this project so its important to have some trusted members involved.
Anyway i think its more important to get discussion on the specs for this coin that the name.
I vote for
- no premine
- anti-instamine protection
- number of coins around 200.000.000 (would be enough to have the new coin lowest unit comparable to an US$ cent and still have enough digits to able to pay twice the combined World GDP and US National debt)
Interesting idea... but we need to help those scammed by StackCoin, that's the point right? We need some kind of trust fund or premine fund so that the StackCoin IPO investors get at least some of what they were promised. Regarding the scammer faking investors, if he were to send BTC to himself the effect would be identical, if StackCoin had launched he would get to keep that portion of the premine. - The CoinDev.io Team |
|
|
|
|
Original StackCoin Specifications:
Max coins: 134.4 Billion
Block Time: 120 seconds
Difficulty Retarget: Kimoto's gravity well
Block Initial Reward: 1 Million
Block Decrease Rate: 15% /Month
Unless the scammed agree I believe the best thing to do would be a direct up/down scale of those rewards (or just keep them as they were), as that is that the IPO investors agreed upon and lost their hard-earned BTC.
|
|
|
|
We are willing to offer our services about programming your coin free of charge.
- CoinDev.io team
An account created a minute ago from a dev team I've never even heard of. What coins have you developed? Unfortunately we are just in our humble beginnings. We have managed to consistently make currencies in our test environment but so far this would hallmark our first project. As soon as you guys agree on specifications we will work on generating sources and binaries to you for you to evaluate, or whatever process the team behind this coin desires. - CoinDev.io team. |
|
|
|
|
We are willing to offer our services about programming your coin free of charge.
- CoinDev.io team
|
|
|
|
|
