 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
Hi waffle,
I know the next step for you is X13, as you mentioned. Then combining payouts, got it. But whats your overall vision right now? Multi-algo switching? Keep em separate? Deploy wafflecoin? {/joke}
Any insight would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
The table title X11 quickstart is titled "Scrypt-N Mining". Don't you hate those copy/paste errors?  |
|
|
|
I do not want to be tweaking a system all the time.
If you don't want to be tweaking... then stay scrypt. If you want to be making 35% more money, then you better get used to it  More algos on the way... |
|
|
|
|
Makes perfect sense. Out of curiosity, I know scryptN is usually referred to as "about half the hash as scrypt" but is the 0.47 a proven value?
|
|
|
|
Thanks, you're on fire today with the quickness. ONE OTHER QUESTION: Example:  What happened to the scrypt-n vsLTC stats? Yesterday these numbers were mostly in the 200%+... how is it these numbers have changed after the fact? Was there an error in the original calculation? I see you've updated your FAQ: http://wafflepool.com/faq#normalizedIs this a change implemented just today, as in it was previously calculated without the 0.47? |
|
|
|
|
I hate to be whiney, but can we have server time at least on the bottom of the page? I reference it all the time, and it seems it was sacrificed to make room for the top stats.
Love all the other changes! Nice work.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the quickstart guides. Under "Scrypt-N Mining" The link says "sph-sgminer (all miners)" but it forwards to TheKev Vertminer. Error in link title?
Yep, fixing that now (good catch). I went back and forth between linking to sgminer/vertminer, switched the link, didn't switch the title  Glad to be of service |
|
|
|
|
Hi Waffle,
Thanks for the quickstart guides. Under "Scrypt-N Mining" The link says "sph-sgminer (all miners)" but it forwards to TheKev Vertminer. Error in link title?
|
|
|
|
Again, sorry it has to happen, feel free to rant about how this is the end of WP/multipools/etc, it wasn't a decision made lightly.
I've got no issue with this. I think you've been quite open and transparent since the pool opened. 2% is excellent. Thanks for your work! |
|
|
|
Can someone explain how failover works and why it swtiched back to waffle and is mining shit all?
CGWatcher is your friend. |
|
|
|
|
CGMiner reports all WafflePool servers are down.
|
|
|
|
Hi Waffle. Interested in your outlook on a recent announcement by the doge-dev's: "We ARE fixing the Block Rewards, and difficulty distortion from Multipools" Source found here: http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/204nrf/ann_we_are_fixing_the_block_rewards_and/tl,dr; This new build being developed by myself and rog (Rapidhash pool op) will fully stop pools/multipool's gaming the randomly generated block system, alongside help us prevent against multipool's greatly distorting our hashrates. We're working as fast as possible. We're testing as fast as possible. We're ensuring this fork will be pre-planned, allowing for apt time to update wallets in advance. We'll get it deployed as fast as possible. Keep the faith, and keep mining on. |
|
|
|
I highly doubt you will get a clear reply from cryptsy. That site works right up until it doesn't and then you simply have to wait.
This is probably true. While I understand there are not many options for alternatives to cryptsy's autotrading and API features, I would feel A LOT better if we move away from Cryptsy. I might be wrong here, but I've never trusted them and even worse since their payouts and support requests have been SO SLOW. I feel its a bad sign. What's going to happen when instead of payouts taking 5 hours, they take 25 hours? Having some contingencies in place seems like a necessity. |
|
|
|
|
