 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
can the temperature be regulated separately for each card as in ETH dual miner? (e.g. -tt 70,79,65) If no, please, add this feature.
|
|
|
|
|
another idea for monitor: add statistics about how many times every GPU gave incorrect result. As it is can be because of too much overclocking, that statistics can help to see which GPU needs to be underclocked a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
When dualminer 3.3 makes failover to secondary pool, when it revert back to main pool?
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Claymore, can we expect separate temp control for all cards in rig? Cause for example i have in one rig 270x and 290 and now 270x temp is never go more than 70, and 290 temp is still on 81. So, setting -tt 80 wil cause 270x fans to be continuously switched on and off. Thanx.
|
|
|
|
|
-cclock and -mclock does not work at all (2*270x + 1*290, drv.15.7.1). All clocks can be setted through sgminer (1120 for my 270x and 1080 for 290), but then, after starting Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred GPU Miner, clock drops for 290 to 990.. wierd.. also, when Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred GPU Miner is working, MS AB can only set fan %
|
|
|
|
coin_bootstrap_1150000_1456785214_2016-02-29T22-33-34.7zun7zip to %APPDATA%\Execoin (or C:\Users\you\AppData\Roaming\Execoin
if you wish restart from beginning, delete all files in this dir except wallet.dat and bootstrap.dat.
launch execoin, it should display "Importing blocks from disk". thanx.. that helps |
|
|
|
I seem to remember that there was multiples releases tagged as 0.8.6.3.
Be sure to use lastest from here : https[Suspicious link removed]coin/releases.
does not help too. the same picture: "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade or other nodes may need to upgrade". |
|
|
|
Please try in your config. I started my old linux node, it synced without (ok, almost without  problems. Added. Still the same problems |
|
|
|
|
Hello. I have sync problem. Wallet 0.8.6.3. Already removed all from execoin folder (except wallet.dat) but still no sync. Have 5 network connection in wallet. Also, there is a label in wallet (under menu buttons): "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade or other nodes may need to upgrade".
|
|
|
|
205 - (205 * .14) = ~176
Close to what I've got, 185 with no HW errors, ever. All right. Any 280X/290X numbers?
Can i ask: I have 2 R9 270x 2Gb and 2 R9 270x 4Gb. What's different settings i have to set? buffersize? but if i try to set buffersize for 4Gb card twice more than for 2Gb, i got a kernel error and card are OFF. May be i have to lower -R ? I have only 4Gb of RAM (Win7 64bit) |
|
|
|
Nf16 hashrates?
On NF16 I'm getting 205 h/s from R9 270x with ~14% HW errors (on 140A there is 1R and 20HW) |
|
|
|
|
I have 2 R9 270x 2Gb and 2 R9 270x 4Gb. What's different settings i have to set? buffersize? but if i try to set buffersize for 4Gb card twice more than for 2Gb, i got a kernel error and card are OFF. May be i have to lower -R ?
|
|
|
|
|
With worksize 256 and 4 threads R9 270x on 1100/1400 gives 267Mh/s. Many thanx. Waiting for clocks and temp control within Smelter.
|
|
|
|
|
On NF 16 I'm getting 205 h/s from R9 270x with ~14% HW errors (on 140 A there is 1 R and 20HW). Is this OK?
|
|
|
|
|
AGAIN, my question: What will happen, if i do not send my DCX for swap till tomorrow? They will be desroyed?
|
|
|
|
|
What will happen, if i do not send my DCX for swap till tomorrow? They will be desroyed?
|
|
|
|
|
