Oh boy! It had to be this way, sad. I know everyone of you understood my point and all of you do believe I was somewhat right. But your supremacy won't allow you to agree with me. I am not advocating ban for this, nor I want someone from DT to give red trust for that. All I was trying was to point out a classic case of signature spamming.


When he can edit his first post once, why did he need to create new post for other update. Second post doesn't even looks like update. It looks like a spin-off of first one.


You may think this to be a joke but you pretty much aware that members here will try their best to go through all my history and point out any silly mistake I did in past as a counter to this thread if I posted it from my main account.


I didn't even find your comment funny at all. Try to spend more time with Lauda and suchmoon and improve your sarcasm.


You are seasoned member, I hope you know signatures don't show in Wall Observer thread. So among all reasons of posting, I don't think anyone post in that thread to increase post count for signature campaign.



Well, well, well. I don't think there is need to keep this thread rolling any longer. Sayonara!

I have been going through Press section when I noticed one of the Chipmixer participant posting in same thread twice.

Link to thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5142449.0

Post 1:

Post 2:


Nobody asked him question, nobody quoted his first post. But he came and created second reply. I don't see anything important in second post so that should be created at all. He could edit his point in first post itself. I want to know if this even allowed because it seems like mere attempt to earn more from signature campaign.

PS: I created new account to create this thread because I don't want to attract any personal vendetta at all. Who knows whose the friend and whose the foe.